Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs 20: What Is Different With New Adrenaline? [2020]

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs 20: What Is Different With New Adrenaline? [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. I may recieve a commission if you purchase something mentioned in this post. See more details here.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs 20. Is the new version any different than the old one?

Is the new Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 as comfortable as the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20?

Will it provide the same stability?

If you want to know the answer to these questions and put your mind at rest, then this detailed comparison of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 will do the trick.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs 20 Header Image-min

What is the main difference between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 vs 20?

The main difference between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 vs 20 is that the DNA LOFT cushioning of the midsole of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 now extends till the forefoot w which was not present in Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20. This provides you with an ultrasmooth heel to toe transition and makes your running more comfortable.

However, this is not the only difference and for more details read on…

Introducing Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21

What is new?

  • More forgiving cushioning.
  • Excellent protection.
  • DNA LOFT cushioning extends till the forefoot.
  • Good for both long and short distance running.
  • Roomier toe-box.
  • Good ankle stability.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 – An Overview

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 much like its predecessor Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 is a stability running shoe with a lot of cushioning.

However, Adrenaline 21 is an much improved version than Adrenaline GTS 20 and the midsole is not the only difference.

Also, Brooks did not alter the basic features of this running shoe and like GTS 20, Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 is also focused on your knee protection.

You will also find the segmented crash-pad that is capable of handling any type of foot-landing.

If everything is the same, then what is the difference?

Without further ado, let’s begin…

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs Adrenaline GTS 20 – Features at a glance

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20
Brooks Women's Adrenaline GTS 21, Black/Raspberry, 7 MediumBrooks Men's Adrenaline GTS 20, Grey/Blue, 9.5 EE US
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!
Price$129.95$109.95
TypeStabilityStability
Heel-to-toe Drop12mm12mm
Weight9.1oz/258g (Women)
10.4oz/294.8g (Men)
9.4oz/266.5g (Women)
10.6oz/300.5g (Men)
Arch SupportMedium, HighMedium, High
Midsole TypeCushion Level 2Cushion Level 2
Technology3D Fit Print, GuideRails, Segmented Crash Pad, DNA LOFTGuideRails, DNA LOFT, BioMoGo DNA
Sizes5.0 – 13.0 (Women)
7.0 – 15.0 (Men)
5.0 – 13.0 (Women)
7.0 – 15.0 (Men)
WidthNormal, Narrow 2A, Wide D (Women)
Normal, Narrow B, Wide 2E, Extra Wide 4E (Men)
Normal, Narrow 2A, Wide D, Extra Wide 2E (Women)
Normal, Narrow B, Wide 2E, Extra Wide 4E (Men)
UseLong Distance, Treadmill, RoadLong Distance, Treadmill, Road
Editor’s Rating4 and a half star-92X25-min4 and a half star-92X25-min
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!

The key differences between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20

  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 feels more spacious than Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.
  • Brooks Adrenaline 21 has DNA LOFT till the end of forefoot unlike Brooks Adrenaline 20 which has it from the midfoot to rearfoot.
  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 provides you with a butterfly smooth heel-to-toe transition that is much smoother than Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.
  • Adrenaline 21 is a tad lighter and weighs around 9.1oz for women and 10.4oz for men, whereas Adrenaline 20 weighs around 9.4oz for women and 10.6oz for men.
  • Adrenaline GTS 21 is more spacious in the toe-box, whereas comparatively Adrenaline GTS 20 is a bit narrower.
  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 now comes with an open-air mesh which provides you with improved breathability than Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.
  • As of now, color choices for Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 is limited to around 2 (may change in the future as with most newly launched shoes from Brooks). Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 provides you with a wide range of colors to choose from.
  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 is selling at a premium as it is just launched. That way, Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 is selling at a reduced price now.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs. 20 – A head to head comparison

Above, we have shared with you all the broad differences between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20. 

In the following sections, we will pick up each component that makes up these shoes and will compare them in detail.

If you just want to get the crux of it, we have provided it in the image below.

However, if you want to understand the nuances in detail, then read on…

Brooks Adrenaline 21 Vs. Brooks Adrenaline 20 Core Specs-min

Outsole

Both Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 have blown rubber in the outsole. Also, the rubber stretching pattern of the rubber in both the shoes are similar.

Apparently, the only difference in the outsole seems to be the placement of DNA LOFT logo.

However, if you look very closely, you will see that in Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20, there were small holes in the outsole whereas that is absent in the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.

Another subtle yet significant difference between the outsole of these two shoes is the tread patterns.

It is more intricate in Adrenaline GTS 21 and this may be an effort to improve the overall grip of these shoes.

Did it make a difference?

Well, it’s too early to tell. However, it seems like runners are liking this improved outsole.

Midsole

One way that Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 stands apart from Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 is the midsole.

The midsole of GTS 21 is made to provide you with more comfort to your entire foot and that is the reason that DNA LOFT is spread through the entire midsole.

This provides you with not only plush comfort but also an extremely smooth heel to toe transition.

This is unlike GTS 20 which has DNA LOFT till the midfoot from the heels.

Apart from this, Adrenaline GTS 21 midsole has the same GuideRails as Adrenaline GTS 20. In other words, Adrenaline GTS 21 is also focused on your knee protection, much like Adrenaline 20.

Also, the heel to toe drop of Adrenaline GTS 21 is the same as Adrenaline GTS 20 and is at 12mm which is great for runners who have additional problems like Achilles Tendonitis.

Brooks did not change the arch support for these shoes as well and Adrenaline GTS 21 supports runners with medium to high arches.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 Durability-min

Upper

Both of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 has the same 3D Fit Print technology used for making the upper.

However, in GTS 21, the mesh is improved to provide you with better breathability. The type of mesh that is being used in Adrenaline 21 is the open-air mesh.

All in all, your feet will get less sweaty and you will have an amazing running experience using Adrenaline GTS 21.

Also, the toe box of GTS 21 seems to be a bit spacious than that of Adrenaline GTS 20. This will squeeze your feet less and will provide you with better mobility.

The widths that are available for Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Normal, Narrow 2A, and Wide D for women and Normal, Narrow B, Wide 2E, and Extra Wide 4E for men. This means as of now, there is one more width present for women in Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20. However, this will possibly change in the future.

Also, the sizes that are available for Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 are the same as Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20. So, for women, you have 5.0 to 13.0 and for men, you have 7.0 to 15.0 in both the versions.

Another major difference between the upper of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 is that the patterns and prints on GTS 21 are way more intricate than GTS 20.

Does that mean that it is better looking than GTS 20? Well, that depends. I kinda like GTS 20’s upper more than GTS 21.

However, for Brooks Adrenaline 21, I can only say that its look is in-line with that of Brooks Ghost 13.

Weight

In terms of weight, Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 is a bit lighter than Brooks Adrenaline 20.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 weighs around 9.1oz/258g for women and for men it weighs around 10.4oz/294g.

On the other hand, Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 weighs around 9.4oz/266g for the women’s shoe, and for men, it weighs around 10.6oz/300.5g.

However, performance-wise, you will not notice any significant difference due to weight.

Price

As for the price, there is some difference between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 vs Brooks Adrenaline 20.

Since Adrenaline 21 is just launched, it is priced at par with the newer models from Brooks and will cost you around $150. However, Adrenaline 20’s price has come down and will now cost you around $100.

However, if you want to get a decent stability shoe at a significantly lower price, you can go for Brooks Adrenaline GTS 19 or Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs 20 Pros and Cons-min

These are all the similarities and the differences between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.

However, if you are keen on some alternatives, before making a decision, then check below…

Similar Shoes

Running Shoes Similar To Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 and GTS 20

Brooks Adrenaline GTS range is fantastic shoes. It is very difficult to come up with alternatives for Brooks Adrenaline.

However, after terribly long researches and 20 cups of coffee, we have found the best Brooks Adrenaline GTS alternatives that you may try.

However, we think the below option is the best alternative to Brooks Adrenaline GTS.

ASICS Gel Kayano 27 Running Shoes
548 Reviews
ASICS Gel Kayano 27 Running Shoes
  • Rearfoot and Forefoot GEL Technology Cushioning System - Attenuates shock during impact and toe-off phases, and allows movement in multiple planes as the foot transitions through the gait cycle.
  • FlyteFoam Propel Technology - ASICS energetic foam formulation that provides supreme bounce thanks to a unique elastomer compound.
  • FlyteFoam Midsole Technology - Our FlyteFoam technology provides exceptional bounce back and responsiveness no matter the distance, utilizing organic super fibers to help reduce packing out that traditionally happens with softer, low density foams.

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Conclusion

In the above guide, we have provided you with a detailed comparison of “Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 Vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 review”.

In a nutshell, we found that Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 is more comfortable and spacious.

If you are interested in more details, you can check out Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 here.

Also, let us know what you think…

Comparing Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 with GTS 20 is very difficult. These are the best running shoes for overpronation. However, not only that, they are a top choice for long-distance runners. Then what is the difference? Find out here in this detailed comparison of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.

Comparing Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 with GTS 20 is very difficult. These are the best running shoes for overpronation. However, not only that, they are a top choice for long-distance runners. Then what is the difference? Find out here in this detailed comparison of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 21 vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Latest Comparisons

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin – Which Brooks Is Best For Your Feet In [2020]?

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin – Which Brooks Is Best For Your Feet In [2020]?

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. I may recieve a commission if you purchase something mentioned in this post. See more details here.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin. These two running shoes are very different from each other, in a way that your feet will know.

One is a neutral running shoe whereas the other is for overpronation.

One is like walking on the clouds and the other is a stable comfort.

So which one should you choose?

If you are confused about the choices, let’s jump right into Brooks Adrenaline vs Glycerin and help you to make a more informed choice.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin header image-min

This is our winner

Last update on 2020-10-27 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Brooks Glycerin 18

Why it is better?

  • More forgiving cushioning.
  • Excellent protection.
  • Plush cushioning level.
  • Good for both long and short distance running.
  • Roomy toe-box.
  • Good ankle stability.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin – An Overview

Brooks Adrenaline is a stability running shoe whereas Brooks Glycerin is a neutral running shoe with a huge amount of cushioning.

Is that the only difference? Well no, duh!

Not only the sole but the overall feel of these shoes are a lot different.

Brooks Adrenaline is more focused on providing you with improved knee protection whereas, Brooks Glycerin, will provide you with more cushy comfort.

Although this is one major difference, there are many. We will look into all the differences in great detail so that you can make the right choice for yourself.

So, without further ado, let’s begin…

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin – Features at a glance

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20Brooks Glycerin 18
Brooks Men's Adrenaline GTS 20, Grey/Blue, 9.5 EE USBrooks Women's Glycerin 18, Purple/Cantaloupe, 9.5 Medium
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!
Price$109.95$149.95
TypeStabilityNeutral
Heel-to-toe Drop12mm10mm
Weight9.4oz/266.5g (Women)
10.6oz/300.5g (Men)
9oz/255.1g (Women)
10.2oz/289.2g (Men)
Arch SupportMedium, HighMedium, High
Midsole TypeCushion Level 2Cushion Level 3
TechnologyGuideRails, DNA LOFT, BioMoGo DNA3D Fit Print, DNA LOFT
Sizes5.0 – 13.0 (Women)
7.0 – 15.0 (Men)
5.0 – 12.0 (Women)
7.0 – 15.0 (Men)
WidthNormal, Narrow 2A, Wide D, Extra Wide 2E (Women)
Normal, Narrow B, Wide 2E, Extra Wide 4E (Men)
Normal, Narrow 2A, Wide D (Women)
Normal, Extra Wide 2E (Men)
UseLong Distance, Treadmill, RoadLong Distance, Treadmill, Road
Editor’s Rating4 and a half star-92X25-min4 and a half star-92X25-min
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!

The main differences between Brooks Adrenaline GTS Vs Brooks Glycerin

  • Brooks Glycerin is a neutral running shoe that is focused more on providing plush cushioning to the runners. Brooks Adrenaline, on the other hand, is a stability running shoe meant for runners with overpronation.
  • Brooks Adrenaline is more focused on knee stability and has a Holistic GuideRail System. Brooks Glycerin is more focused on cushioning and plushness.
  • The latest generation of Brooks Adrenaline is 20 wheres the current version of Glycerin is 18.
  • For Brooks Adrenaline, there are more widths available for both genders whereas for Brooks Glycerin there is a lesser number of widths.
  • Brooks Glycerin uses Cushion level 3 for cushioning. Brooks Adrenaline on the other hand has cushion level 2 cushioning.
  • For Glycerin, the toe box seems to be roomier, whereas for Brooks Adrenaline it is a bit constricting.
  • Brooks Adrenaline is a bit heavier than Brooks Glycerin due to the Holistic GuideRail System.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs. Glycerin – A head to head comparison

In the above sections, we have covered all the broad differences between Brooks Adrenaline and Brooks Glycerin.

In the following sections, we will cover all the other differences between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 and Brooks Glycerin 18.

We have summarized all the differences in the images below.

You may get the details you are looking for from there, otherwise, just read on…

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin header image - Core Specs-min

Outsole

Both Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 and Brooks Glycerin 18 have blown rubber in the outsole. Also, the rubber stretching pattern of the rubber in both the shoes are similar.

However, the major difference in the outsole is how the segmentation or the deep grooves are present in the shoes.

Brooks Adrenaline has a deep groove at the start of the forefoot or near the balls of the foot.

For Glycerin, it is more on the arches and the start of the forefoot.

Also, apparently to the eye, the grooves of Adrenaline seems to be deeper and that provides the flexibility of this shoe.

For Brooks Glycerin 18 this is not the case and seems like the flexibility may be a bit less than Adrenaline. This makes sense, as Glycerin has more cushioning than Adrenaline, and providing more flexibility to this shoe will only open up the runner for more injury.

Midsole

The midsole of these two shoes is a bit different although the basic material used to build the midsoles is the same.

Brooks Adrenaline comes with a balanced yet soft cushioning. It has the responsive BioMoGo DNA cushioning placed above the soft DNA LOFT crash pad.

They work together to provide springiness along with soft cushioning underfoot.

Also, this is a running shoe meant for overpronators. So, Brooks has taken special care to minimize your excess knee movement by introducing the GuideRails Holistic Support System which is becoming the norm of most of the overpronation shoes from Brooks.

As for Brooks Glycerin, it comes with a super-soft cushioning. The midsole and outsole ratio is reconfigured in this version of Glycerin. This allowed for an increase in DNA LOFT for even more softness underfoot.

However, this added softness doesn’t compromise the responsiveness or durability of this shoe.

Also, for step-in comfort, Glycerin comes with an Ortholite sock-liner that provides premium softness.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin header image - durability-min

Upper

The upper of Brooks Adrenaline is made from 3D Fit Print mesh. This is a new streamlined, engineered mesh that offers structure and proper fit. This improved structure of the mesh helps Adrenaline to shave some of its weight.

Brooks Glycerin also comes with 3D Fit Print technology, that helps you to have a better fit. Also, the updated stretch of the double jacquard mesh is engineered for strategic breathability, flexibility, and structure.

Width-wise, Brooks Adrenaline has more number of widths like Normal, Narrow B, Wide 2E, and Extra Wide 4E for men and Normal, Narrow 2A, Wide D, and Extra Wide 2E for women.

For Brooks Glycerin, there is a lesser number of widths available for both men and women. For men, it is only Normal and Wide 2E and for women, it is Normal, Narrow 2A, and Wide D.

In fact with sizes also, Adrenaline will provide you with one more size than Brooks Glycerin 18 for Women. In Adrenaline, available sizes for women are 5.0 to 13.0 whereas, in Glycerin, it is from 5.0 to 12.0.

However, for men, such a difference in sizes doesn’t exist and for both the shoes it is from 7.0 to 15.0.

At the time of writing this post, there are more color variations available for Adrenaline whereas, for Glycerin, the number of color choices is only a handful.

Brooks Adrenaline looks more stylish and less bulky whereas Brooks Glycerin looks a bit bulky and big.

Weight

In terms of weight, both Brooks Adrenaline GTS and Brooks Glycerin are not much different.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS weighs around 9.4oz/266.5g for women and for men it weighs around 10.6oz/300.5g.

Brooks Glycerin weighs around 9oz/255.1g for women’s version and for men’s version it weighs around 10.2oz/289.2g.

So, while using either of them, you will not be held down by excessive weight and in both, your performance will not suffer due to the weight of the shoe.

Also, if you are wondering about the extra weight of Adrenaline…then my calculated guess is the added GuideRails. This adds to the weight, although not significant.

Price

As for the price, there is some difference between Brooks Adrenaline GTS vs Glycerine.

Adrenaline will cost you a little more than $100 whereas Glycerin will cost you near $150.

This is understandable as Brooks Glycerin has more cushioning than Brooks Adrenaline and as in most shoes, this is what determines the price of the shoe.

However, these two versions are recently launched. If you don’t want to go for these but still want to pick up a Glycerin or Adrenaline then go for the previous versions.

Since the launch of this current version of these running shoes, prices of the earlier versions, that is, Brooks Glycerin 17 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 19 have dropped drastically. 

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin header image - Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 vs Brooks Glycerin 18 Pros and Cons-min

These are all the similarities and the differences between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 and Brooks Glycerin 18.

However, some of our readers may want to check out some of the alternatives for these shoes.

If you are one of them, we have provided you with all the alternatives below…

Similar Shoes

Running Shoes Similar To Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 is a fantastic shoe. It is difficult to come up with alternatives for Brooks Adrenaline.

However, we have tried our best, and here are the best Brooks Adrenaline GTS alternatives that you may try.

Running Shoes Similar To Brooks Glycerin 18

Brooks Glycerin 18 is a remarkable running shoe and has a lot of alternatives. However, we are still working on the list.

In the meantime, you can check out the below option as a suitable alternative to Brooks Glycerin 18.

Brooks Ghost 13 Running Shoes
  • THIS SHOE IS FOR: The Ghost 13 is for runners looking for a reliable shoe that's soft and smooth. The Ghost 13 offers improved transitions for zero distractions so you can focus more on what matters most: your run.
  • SUPPORT AND CUSHION: The neutral support type provideds high energizing cushioning. Ideal for road running, cross training, the gym or wherever you might want to take them! Predecessor: Ghost 12
  • BALANCED, SOFT CUSHIONING: BioMoGo DNA and DNA LOFT cushioning work together to provide a just-right softness underfoot without losing responsiveness and durability - yet it feels lighter than ever.

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Conclusion

In the above guide, we have provided you with all the required information and a detailed “Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin review”.

You will be surely able to pick-up the correct running shoe for your need.

However, we found that one of them have more cushioning than the other and the toe-box seemed to be more accommodative.

This is the reason we chose Brooks Glycerin over Brooks Adrenaline.

Let us know what you think…

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin...which is the best running shoe? Which running shoe will suit you the most? Find out in this detailed comparison of Brooks Adrenaline GTS and Brooks Glycerin.

Brooks Adrenaline Vs Glycerin…which is the best running shoe? Which running shoe will suit you the most? Find out in this detailed comparison of Brooks Adrenaline GTS and Brooks Glycerin.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Latest Comparisons

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

Top 10 Best Asics Gel-Hyperspeed Alternatives That Are Its Perfect Replacement [2020]

Top 10 Best Asics Gel-Hyperspeed Alternatives That Are Its Perfect Replacement [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. I may recieve a commission if you purchase something mentioned in this post. See more details here.
ASICS Hyperspeed is a lightweight running or training shoes and performs remarkably. It is light-weight with optimum cushioning which helps you to perform better.

However, these running shoes have been discontinued and you may be searching for running shoes that are comparable to the. So here are the best ASICS Hyperspeed alternatives and our comparison baseline is Asics Hyperspeed 7.

Let’s find out what are the top alternatives for Asics Hyperspeed 7.

The Best Asics Gel Hyper Speed Alternatives

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes the same as Asics Hyperspeed.
  • Good for running on the treadmill, training, and roads.
  • Good forefoot and heel cushioning similar to Hyperspeed.
  • Almost the same weight as Asics Hyperspeed.

Let’s understand Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7

If you want to pick the right replacement for Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7 you need to understand the qualities of these running shoes.

Otherwise, you may pick up something like this one, which will give you a disastrous result.

Unless you are not aware of the features and design of Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7, you may not be able to compare it with its alternatives.

Gel Hyper Speed 7 is a daily running shoe which is also great as a trainer.

These running shoes are long-lasting, comfortable and have superior fit.

It has rear foot gel cushioning that is great for shock absorption.

Also the shoe is made of seamless materials that are ergonomically designed to ensure long lasting comfort.

Outsole of this running shoe is made from blown rubber which is great at durability and grip. As with other models from ASICS, the outsole of this one is made from AHAR or ASICS High Abrasion Rubber.

It comes with removable sock-liner and which can be replaced with orthotics if needed.

The upper of the shoe is made of open mesh and has a seamless design for an irritation free experience.

With printed design, lesser overlays and bright colors, the overall look feels very upbeat.

Now let’s talk about the mid-sole…

The mid-sole of Gel Hyper Speed 7 comes with fore-foot gel cushioning system that makes it great for forefoot strikers.

Also, the SpEVA foam in the midsole makes these shoes lightweight and cushy.

Running shoes similar to Brooks Launch – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
BROOKS GHOST 13

Brooks Ghost 13 is our first preference for ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed.

Brooks Ghost 13 is a neutral running shoe that is similar to ASICS Gel Hyper Speed.

However, Brooks Ghost 13 is more comfortable and due to the use of more DNA LOFT material in this current version. ASICS Hyperspeed on the other hand has SpEVA foam which is kind of firmer but is very good at shock absorption.

Both of these running shoes are great for road running, cross-training, the gym.

The Ghost 13 offers an engineered Air Mesh Upper that promises a secure fit and also delivers breathability that enhances running performance.

Breathability-wise, ASICS Gel Hyperspeed is also good as it comes with an open mesh which helps in unrestricted air flow.

Also, Gel Hyper Speed 7 optimizes moisture drainage and also improves breathability.

The forefoot of Gel Hyper Speed 7 comes with ASICS Gel Cushioning which is soft and acts as a great shock absorber.

For Ghost 13, the DNA LOFT  cushioning makes these running shoes very comfortable and offers a smooth ride from landing to toe-off.

Finally, the out-sole of both shoes is made of rubber material that enhances the life of the shoe. 

However, one big difference between Brooks Ghost and ASICS Hyperspeed is that they vary greatly in the heel drop.

Hyperspeed has a drop of around 6 mm whereas Ghost has a whopping 12mm. You must consider this before giving Ghost a try.

+ POSITIVES

  • BioMoGo DNA and DNA LOFT cushioning that provide softness underfoot experience.
  • Very Comfortable, lightweight and durable.
  • 3D fit print and offers soft secure fit.
  • Breathable upper so your feet feel dry all day long.
  • Segmented Crash Pad that offers stable ride every time.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some users are not happy with the color.
  • Durability may be a bit less.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)
NEW BALANCE FRESH FOAM BEACON V2, top choice for Asics Hyperspeed alternative

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 can serve you as one of the best Asics gel hyperspeed 7 replacement.

New Balance Beacon V2 is a light-weight well-cushioned running shoe that is similar to Asics gel hyperspeed.

Also, it is a neutral shoe like Hyperspeed and will keep you as comfortable as later.

One of the biggest difference between Hyperspeed with Ghost was the heel to toe drop.

However, with New Balance Beacon this is also not a problem. Hyperspeed has a drop of 6mm which is the same drop that Beacon has.

In terms of weight also, Beacon v2 is similar to that of Hyperspeed. Both stand at around 6-7 oz.

However, in terms of comfort, New Balance Beacon is a bit more comfortable as its midsole is made from Fresh Foam. Hyperspeed has SpEVA foam and is a bit firmer.

The outsole of Beacon has ground contact EVA Foam, with rubber pods placed strategically placed at heels and forefoot.  The minimize the shoe weight and makes it long-lasting.

The outsole of Hyperspeed is made AHAR or ASICS High Abrasion Rubber which is a kind of long-lasting rubber that provides you with superior durability and grip.

The upper of Beacon V2 has a soft upper made with Engineered knit fabric.  It has Ultra Heel Construction for narrower rearfoot.  This keeps the heel intact and more secure.

The Hyperspeed has open-air mesh which provides you with very good breathability. Also, the ankle area is well cushioned and will help you to keep your feet more stable.

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 makes it suitable for speed and tempo run. This can also be used for long-distance, road, or treadmill running and cross-training.

The Asics Hyperspeed is also very lightweight and is a great one for training, long-distance, road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for training purposes.
  • Very good shock absoption.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.

 NEGATIVES

  • Durability seems to be a bit less.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
SALOMON SPEEDCROSS 5

Salomon Speedcross 5 seems to be the least likely choice as a running shoe that is similar to Asics Hyperspeed.

However, hear me out. 

Although Salomon Speedcross is a trail running shoe, here are the reasons why it can be another great option in place of Asics Hyperspeed 7.

The outsole of this running shoe is made from blown rubber which provides it with grip and durability.

This is similar to Asics Hyperspeed which has AHAR rubber as its outsole. The difference in the outsole is that Speedcross has lugs that will keep you stable in the trails.

The midsole of Salomon Speedcross 5 is made from LT Muscle which is rugged yet cushiony. In this aspect also, this is similar to Hyperspeed which has SpEVA foam as the midsole and is tough yet cushy.

The upper of Salomon Speedcross is made from engineered mesh with rubberized overlays. This makes it decently breathable.

The Upper of Hyperspeed is also very airy and is made from air mesh which is great in terms of breathability.

However, Salomon Speedcross 5 is a bit heavier than Asics Hyperspeed 7. Speedcross weighs around 10oz whereas Hyperspeed weighs around 6oz.

In terms of the heel to toe drop, Salomon Speedcross has more drop than Asics Hyperspeed. Salomon Speedcross has a 10mm drop whereas Asics Hyperspeed has a 6mm drop.

If you are a trail runner and is looking for something that is similar to Asics Hyperspeed, then Salomon Speedcross may be a good option.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsive and light-weight.
  • Sock-like fit which makes the stride secure.
  • The outsole gives a good grip for running on dry or wet surfaces.
  • The upper is dirt resistant.
  • Comes in very vibrant colors.
  • Long lasting.

+ NEGATIVES

  • The width seems to be a bit less.
  • The sole is on the stiffer side.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
NIKE AIR ZOOM PEGASUS 36

The Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is one of the most preferred alternatives for Asics Gel-Hyperspeed 7 running shoes.

Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is a neutral running shoe like Asics gel-hyperspeed 7. Also, it is a great choice for road running and training much like Asics Hyperspeed.

However, the weight of, Air Zoom Pegasus is approx 10oz/272 g, which is a little more than Asics Gel Hyperspeed 7. This difference, however, will not make much of a difference for shorter running distances.

Heel to toe drop of Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is around 10mm which is a bit more than Asics Gel Hyperspeed and you will be able to feel the difference if you are used to a low drop shoe.

However, this will be beneficial for runners who are prone to Achilles Tendon problems and this running shoe may prevent Achilles tendonitis.

The main difference however lies in the midsole of these shoes.

Nike Air Zoom has a Zoom Air unit. This is an air-bag unit that runs right from the heel to toe. This is supplemented with cushioning provided by the Cushion ST Foam.

Together, they provide good shock absorption and responsiveness.

For Asics Hyperspeed, however, the midsole is made from SpEVA foam and is great at providing cushioning.

The upper of the shoe is designed using Flymesh fabric. This is a very durable and highly breathable material. It keeps your feet cool even while running in the heat.

Nike Air Zoom Pegasus has an aerodynamic shape that helps you with improved speed.

Improved fitting around the heels due to a snugger fit and the trimmed down collar and tongue reduce the shoe weight without reducing the comfort.

The shoelaces are intact with Nike’s Flywire, which gives you a tight and secure fit even when you are running at a very high speed.

Asics Hyperspeed on the other hand has a seamless open mesh that makes it very breathable.

The outsole of Pegasus has strategically placed rubber pods to reduce the overall shoe-weight and at the same time providing appropriate traction.

Hyperspeed has AHAR outsole for better grip and durability.

Pegasus comes with the midfoot transition sole for a smooth toe to heel transitioning and is very much suited for long-distance running. They are great for running on firm surfaces – road, treadmill, or even hard trail.

Hyperspeed is much more suited for shorter distance running and for training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Aerodynamic design for better speed.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good shock absorption.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Comes in nice attractive colors.
  • Durable and lightweight.
  • Highly breathable.
  • Good for runners suffering from calf problems or Achilles tendonitis.

 NEGATIVES

  • Laces may put pressure on the foot.
  • Narrower toe-box.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
Saucony Triumph ISO 5 specs-min

If you like cushy comfort, then you will love Saucony Triumph ISO 5 as an alternative for Asics Gel Hyperspeed.

The midsole of Saucony Triumph ISO 5 is made from EVA foam and comes with an added cushioning of EVERUN midsole.

This makes them very comfortable and provides you with a plush and soft feeling. These running shoes are more comfortable than Asics Hyperspeed and will help you run for a longer duration of time.

The upper Saucony Triumph ISO 5 is made of engineered mesh and boasts of ISOFit technology. This provides you with a comfortable fit.

Asics Gel-Hyperspeed 7 on the other hand has open-air mesh which is also very comfortable and breathable.

The outsole of Saucony Triumph ISO 5 is made from blown rubber whereas for Asics Hyperspeed it is made from AHAR rubber.

However, both of these running shoes provide you with a great grip, however, Triumph seems to be a little less durable than Hyperspeed. 

Also, comparatively, Triumph has a roomier toe-box and overall wider fit. This may not be comfortable for runners with narrower feet.

Saucony Triumph has a little more heel to toe drop and is around 8mm whereas Asics Gel-Hyperspeed has a drop of around 6mm.

This drop is not noticeable but it makes Triumph a preferred choice for runners with Achilles issues.

+ POSITIVES

  • Comfortable and cushy.
  • Lightweight and plush.
  • Roomy toe-box.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Good for long-distance running as well as for trail running.
  • Good for heavier runners.

+ NEGATIVES

  • Overall wider fit may not be preferable for runners with a narrower foot.
  • May be a bit heavier.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
SAUCONY COHESION 13

Saucony Cohesion 13 is your other option for Asics Gel-Hyperspeed Running Shoes.

Since this is a neutral running shoe, it is into the same category as Asics Gel-Hyperspeed.

It is slightly heavier than Asics Hyperspeed and weighs around 9oz. This heaviness may be due to the cushioning of the midsole.

However, the most significant difference between Cohesion 13 and Gel Hyperspeed is that Cohesion 13 has a drop of around 12mm whereas Asics Hyperspeed 7 has a drop of around 6mm.

Saucony Cohesion 13 comes with the VERSARUN midsole which is great at shock absorption and also reduces pressure on your feet.

Asics Gel-Hyperspeed comes with a SpEVA midsole and provides you with springy yet impact-resistant cushioning.

The outsole of Cohesion uses high abrasion rubber for better durability and traction. The segmented outsole provides you with a better heel to toe transition.

The outsole of Gel Hyperspeed uses the AHAR rubber and adds to the flexibility and durability of the shoes.

The upper of Saucony Cohesion 13 has a breathable mesh that will provide you with a comfortable fit. The collar and tongue of this running shoe are sufficiently padded and will keep your ankles more stable.

The upper of Asics Gel-Hyperspeed also has breathable mesh and provides you with and cool and airy environment during running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Good cushioning and lightweight.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Can support runners with neutral to underpronation.
  • Technical to look at.
  • Good for runners with plantar fasciitis.

+ NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems to be a bit off.
  • Durability seems to be a bit less.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
ASICS GEL NIMBUS -22

ASICS Gel-Nimbus 22 is more of a all rounder shoe and can be used for both roads and trails.

They are lightweight and sturdy and provides you with a very energetic ride.

This is the reason that this is one of our top choices for Asics gel-Hyperspeed alternatives.

Also, this is a neutral running shoe much like ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed and comes with flytefoam propel technology in the midsole.

This makes it lightweight and helps you perform better and faster.

Also, the fore foot and rear foot gel cushioning attenuates any kind of shock and helps you to have an injury free running experience.

This is also similar to ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed and provides you with a great running experience.

Both of these shoes have AHAR or ASICS High Abrasion Rubber as the outsole. This provides these running shoes with exceptional durability.

Much like Hyperspeed, Nimbus is also a low drop shoe which makes it a great alternative to Hyperspeed.

+ POSITIVES

  • Comfortable and cushioned running experience.
  • Responsive and lightweight.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Flytefoam technology for reduced weight and performance.
  • Durable.
  • Suitable for both roads and trails.

 NEGATIVES

  • Toe box seems to be on the narrower side.
  • It may feel stiffer for people with sensitive feet.

You can look into Nike Zoom Fly 3 if you are looking for an alternative for ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed. 

This is a neutral running shoe, much like Hyperspeed, and will provide you with great running experience.

In the midsole, it has Lunarlon cushioning which is a combination of hard and soft foam and provides you with the perfect combination of shock absorption, stability, and responsiveness.

Also, in the midsole, it has a nylon and carbon sole plate which can shrink and expand for maximum flexibility in your stride.

The heel arches away from the ankle to relieve pressure on your Achilles tendon thus providing a preventive measure for Achilles injury.

However, the weight of this running shoe is a bit more than the Hyperspeed however that will not make much of a difference in your run.

Also, there is a minor difference in the heel drop and it has a differential of almost 8mm whereas Hyperspeed has somewhere around 6mm.

The upper is made from seamless one-piece fly mesh and provides you with very good breathability and fit.

Also, this running shoe looks a bit different than your traditional running shoes and you are bound to stand out in the crowd.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsive and lightweight.
  • Carbon fiber plate expands and contracts with your stride.
  • Excellent for runners with neutral pronation.
  • Strikingly stylish.
  • Great shock absorption

 NEGATIVES

  • Early wear and tear signs may develop.
  • For some, the back of the shoe felt narrow.

Meet Hoka One One Rincon 6, our next candidate on this list.

Hoka Rincon is also a neutral running shoe, much like Asics Gel-Hyperspeed.

However, weight-wise, it is heavier than Hyperspeed and weighs around 8 oz.

The heel drop is 5 mm which is one of the closest to Hyperspeed but is lesser than it.

The midsole is designed using the compressed EVA Foam and provides Rincon with a balanced cushioning. This makes the midsole light-weight and gives a soft feel to the foot.

The early-staged meta rocker geometry design provides you with an easier heel-to-toe off.

The midsole of Hyperspeed is made from SpEVA foam and provides it with a snappy, responsive feel.

The outsole of Rincon has high abrasion rubber present on the most impacted areas i.e under the front foot and heels. Using the rubber strategically reduces the weight of the shoe.

However, the outsole of Hyperspeed is made up of AHAR rubber makes it very durable and grippy.

The upper of Rincon is made with a light-weight single-layered mesh. This provides high breathability.

Hyperspeed has open mesh for high breathability. This keeps the in-shoe environment very healthy while you are running.

Rincon can be used for road running. The high cushioning makes it suitable for both long and short distance running.

Hyperspeed is a multipurpose shoe and can be used for running, gym and cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and soft.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • The shoe design adds momentum.
  • Durable.
  • Highly breathable.
  • True to size.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off.

Nike Air Zoom Vomero 14 is our next alternative.

This is a neutral running shoe with a heel drop of 10 mm. This is a bit more than ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed.

However, it is a bit heavier than Hyperspeed…

The midsole is designed for an ultra-plush ride with greater responsiveness to the shoe. It has a full-length Nike’s Zoom unit running from heel to toe. The zoom unit along and the React technology together guarantees a soft, smooth, and snappy ride.

The midsole of Hyperspeed is designed using SpEVA foam. This provides you with optimal cushioning and a responsive ride.

The outsole of Vomero uses hard carbon in the entire outsole reason that gives improved traction.

The outsole of Hyperspeed is made up of AHAR rubber is very durable and rugged.

The upper of Vomero is made with a sleek engineered mesh designed for longer durability and support. The Dynamic Fit technology used here combines with Flywire and soft foam to give better support to the midfoot. The forefoot space is very roomy and even has a wider toe-box. The heel collar comes with foam pods which gives better support to the rear foot.

The upper of Hyperspeed is designed using the open mesh and has a  breathable design. 

The Vomero 14 is great for running on-road or treadmill and for running any distance.

The Asics Hyperspeed is more of a multipurpose running shoe that can be used for running, training, cross-training, and other sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Lightweight.
  • Reduced running hangover.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems to be a bit off.
Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Related Posts

Asic Gel-Hyperspeed Running Shoes Alternatives. These are the best running shoes for hyperspeed. Try out these running shoes.

Asic Gel-Hyperspeed Running Shoes Alternatives. These are the best running shoes for hyperspeed. Try out these running shoes.

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton – Which One Is Best For Your Feet? [2020]

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton – Which One Is Best For Your Feet? [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. I may recieve a commission if you purchase something mentioned in this post. See more details here.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton. These two running shoes are very similar and yet very different.

There is a big divide between the running community favoring Hoka or the Brooks.

If you are someone who belongs somewhere in the middle and doesn’t know which one to pick, here is a complete guide that will help you to choose it better.

You will find each and every aspect compared below so that you don’t have to take the headache of comparing them.

So, without further ado, let’s jump into the detailed comparison of Brooks Ghost vs Hoka Clifton.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton header image 2-min

This is our winner

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Brooks Ghost 13

Why it is better?

  • DNA LOFT cushioning is extended till the forefoot.
  • Excellent protection.
  • Truly customized fit.
  • Good for both long and short distance running.
  • More forgiving cushioning.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton – An Overview [2020]

Books Ghost and Hoka Clifton are both neutral running shoes and provide you with a good amount of cushioning.

However, they don’t belong to the maximal cushioning category and both are more of a balanced category.

How are these two running shoes different?

Well, they are a lot different. Since both of these shoes belong to two different manufacturers they inherently are very different.

Brooks Ghost provides you a softer feel whereas Hoka Clifton will provide you with more firmness.

This is not the only difference that these two running shoes have…let’s look into them further.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka One One Clifton – Features at a glance

 

Brooks Ghost 13Hoka Clifton 7
Brooks Ghost 13 Grey/Blackened Pearl/Purple 9 B (M)HOKA ONE ONE Women's Clifton 7 Running Shoe (Black/White, 8)
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!
Price$129.95$179.90
TypeNeutralNeutral
Heel-to-toe Drop12mm5mm
Weight8.8oz/249.5g (Women)
10.1oz/286.3g (Men)
7.10oz/202g (Women)
8.7oz/246.64g (Men)
Arch SupportMedium, HighMedium
Midsole TypeEnergizeBalanced Cushion
TechnologySegmented Crash Pad, DNA LOFTFull compression EVA Foam, Early stage meta rocker, moderate heel bevel, flat waisted geometry
Sizes5.0 – 13.0 (Women)
7.0 – 15.0 (Men)
5.0 – 12.0 (Women)
7.0 – 16.0 (Men)
WidthNormal, Narrow 2A, Wide D (Women)
Normal, Narrow B, Wide 2E, Extra Wide 4E (Men)
Regular, Wide
UseLong Distance, Speed / Track, Cross Training, Treadmill, RoadLong Distance, Road Running, Treadmill
Editor’s Rating4 and a half star-92X25-min4 and a half star-92X25-min
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!

The main differences between Hoka Clifton Vs Brooks Ghost

  • Hoka Clifton is a neutral running shoe that uses early stage meta rocker. Brooks Ghost, on the other hand, is also a neutral running shoe that uses a segmented crash pad.
  • Hoka Clifton is more suitable for running whereas Brooks Ghost can be used for CrossFit as well.
  • The latest generation of Brooks Ghost is 13 wheres the current version of Clifton is 7.
  • Hoka Clifton is available only in two widths, regular and wide whereas Brooks Ghost comes in a lot of fits ensuring more comfort for its users.
  • Hoka Clifton uses energize fully compressed EVA foam for cushioning whereas Brooks Ghost uses DNA LOFT which is a blend of EVA foam, rubber, and air.
  • Hoka Clifton 7 is bulkier in appearance whereas Brooks Ghost 13 is more elegant and fluid to look at.
  • Hoka Clifton’s sole is a bit stiff whereas Brooks Ghost boasts a more flexible sole unit.
  • Price-wise, Hoka Clifton is a bit more expensive than Brooks Ghost.

Brooks Ghost Vs. Hoka Clifton – A head to head comparison

These are all the broad differences between Hoka Clifton and Brooks Ghost.

However, if you look more closely, you will find a lot more differences between Hoka Clifton 7 vs Brooks Ghost 13.

We have put in a lot of details in the following sections if you don’t wish to read so much, please refer to the images to get a fair idea of these shoes.

Otherwise, just read on…

Outsole

Brooks Ghost 13 has HPR Plus and blown rubber. Brooks Ghost has it at the high impact zones which is almost the entire sole in this new version.

You can find this rubber at the heels and on the crash-pad of Brooks Ghost 13 where it is segmented to match with the midsole beneath it.

For Hoka Clifton 7, there are blown rubber strips at the high impact zones. These are present near the forefoot and the far edges of the heels.

This protects the midsole and will provide you with a good grip and durability.

Also, both these running shoes are great at tackling heel to toe transition. 

For this Ghost uses a segmented crash pad and Hoka Clifton uses mile beveled heel and early-stage meta rocker.

Also, this HPR plus and blown rubber of the forefoot in both the shoes are segmented, providing you with a good amount of firmness and flexibility.

Both Brooks Hoka and Hoka Clifton are road running shoes and can work on treadmill and concrete. Brooks Ghost can also be used for Cross-training.

However, they will not work on rough terrains and trails and may get eroded very fast if you try to. This will also decrease their overall life span.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton Core specifications 2-min

Midsole

The midsole of both of these shoes is very different from each other.

Hoka is made from fully compressed EVA foam and is somewhat stiffer whereas Brooks Ghost has DNA LOFT in the entire sole.

DNA LOFT is a mixture of EVA Foam, rubber, and air. This makes it very soft and cushy yet it doesn’t get packed out under your weight.

However, this somewhat decreases the durability of this running shoe.

Also, the heel to toe drop of Brooks Ghost is much more than that of Hoka Clifton. Brooks Ghost has a heel drop of around 12mm whereas Hoka Clifton has a drop of 5mm.

In other words, Hoka Clifton is a low drop shoe and is meant for runners who are looking for a more natural running experience.

Whereas Brooks Ghost is a very good running shoe that can serve runner with Achilles issues also.

Durability wise, both of these running shoes are expected to last for around 300-500 miles or 3 to 6 months which is the standard for most of the running shoes.

Hoka has a flat-waisted geometry which inherently increases its stability and the full ground contact provides you with a smooth and stable ride.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton Durability 2-min

Upper

The upper of Hoka Clifton is made from open-engineered sandwich mesh that delivers ultimate breathable comfort. 

Also, it has lightweight mesh gussets which prevent the movement of the tongue. The reinforced eye stays increases durability.

Hoka One One Clifton 7 comes with a vertical pull tab that increases its style quotient and also makes it easier to put it on.

Brooks Ghost uses 3D fit print that provides you with a comfortable fit and will not cause any irritation to your skin.

Also, since this is an engineered mesh, it allows unrestricted airflow and makes these shoes breathable.

Brooks Ghost has a traditional collar and tongue whereas much like Hoka Clifton. Both of these running shoes are traditional in this aspect.

Also, since both of these running shoes come with a traditional lacing system, it provides a very secure fit at the mid-foot.

However, none of these shoes are waterproof and is completely different to look-at. Brooks Ghost has a premium look but more traditional whereas Hoka Clifton is more stylish and pep to look at.

One of the big differences in the upper of these two shoes is the number of widths that are available. Brooks Ghost 13 comes in a wide range of toe-boxes whereas Hoka Clifton comes in only two widths, normal and wide.

Also, arch support wise, Brooks Ghost is more for medium and high arches whereas Hoka Clifton is meant for more flatter arches.

Weight

In terms of weight, Brooks Ghost 13 is a tad heavier than Hoka Clifton 7.

Brooks Ghost weight around 8.8oz/249.5g for women and 10.1oz/286.3g for men.

Whereas Hoka Clifton weighs around 7.10oz/202g for women and 8.7oz/246.64g for men.

However, this minor difference will not impact your running for a shorter duration. For longer, you need to train with these shoes to understand and tweak your running as needed.

Price

Price-wise also, Hoka Clifton is a bit more than Brooks Ghost.

Brooks Ghost is priced somewhere in the middle of $100 and $150 whereas Hoka Clifton is in the range of $150 to $200.

 

Since the launch of both of the newer models of these shoes, prices of the earlier versions have somewhat gone down.

If you are interested in either of them you may check out Brooks Ghost 12 and Hoka Clifton 6 here. You should get both of these shoes at a reasonable price.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton pros and cons 2-min

That’s all with the differences and similarities between Brooks Ghost 13 and Hoka Clifton 7.

If you want to look at some alternatives to both the shoes, then read on…

Similar Shoes

Running Shoes Similar To Brooks Ghost 13

There are couple of shoes that are as good as Brooks Ghost 13.

Here is the entire list of the best Brooks Ghost alternatives.

However, our top preference is the one below:

Brooks Glycerin 18 Running Shoes
1,267 Reviews
Brooks Glycerin 18 Running Shoes
  • THIS SHOE IS FOR: The Glycerin 18 is perfect for runners who think there's no such thing as too much cushioning. The upper enhances comfort by perfectly balancing stretch and structure.
  • SUPPORT AND CUSHION: Provides neutral support while offering the maximum amount of cushioning. Ideal for road running, cross training, the gym or wherever you might want to take them! Predecessor: Glycerin 17.
  • SUPER-SOFT CUSHIONING: Increased DNA LOFT super-soft cushioning allows for even more extreme softness, without losing responsiveness or durability, while the OrthoLite sockliner provides premium step-in comfort.

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Running Shoes Similar to Hoka Clifton 7

We have also found some great alternatives to Hoka Clifton 7.

Here are the best Hoka Clifton alternatives:

You may try the following one:

New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 Running Shoes
346 Reviews
New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 Running Shoes
  • Ultra-plush Fresh Foam Ground Contact midsole is supremely lightweight
  • Soft engineered knit upper features a new Ultra Heel construction for a sleek rearfoot fit
  • Rubber pods are carefully placed in the high-abrasion heel and toe-off areas

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Conclusion

We have tried to provide you all the required details of in this “Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton review”.

However, we like the Brooks Ghost sole unit better, and that is the reason we chose Brooks Ghost over Hoka Clifton Brooks Levitate.

Let us know if you have any further questions.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton, which is the best running shoe? Also, between these running shoes which one is the top choice for your feet? Find out in this Brooks Vs Hoka One One Clifton comparison.

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton, which is the best running shoe? Also, between these running shoes which one is the top choice for your feet? Find out in this Brooks Vs Hoka One One Clifton comparison.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Latest Comparisons

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

The Top 10 Best Hoka One One Clifton Alternatives You Can Safely Try In 2020

The Top 10 Best Hoka One One Clifton Alternatives You Can Safely Try In 2020

Last Updated: October 8th, 2020

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

Today, we shall see the best alternative for Hoka One One Clifton. This is a perfect combination of soft and light running shoes.  To compare Clifton with the other available alternatives, we consider Hoka One One Clifton 7 (affiliate link) as our baseline model.

Let’s see the best available alternative for Clifton.

The Best Hoka One One Clifton 7 Alternative

Last update on 2020-10-27 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

(affiliate link)

Brooks Glycerin 18

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes the same as Clifton 
  • Support runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for running on the treadmill, and roads and long-distance running.

Check this on Amazon!(affiliate link)

Let’s understand Hoka One One Clifton

Today we are presenting on the alternatives for Hoka One One Clifton 7.

But, before we list out the various options, let us first dive into the details of Clifton.

This is very important as if you do not know about Clifton 7, you will not be able to compare the other running shoes with Clifton and select them wisely.

Hoka One One Clifton is a neutral running shoe for runners with medium to high arches.

It weighs around 9.1oz/242 g and has a heel drop of 5 mm.

Clifton has a midsole designed using the EVA foam. This makes it utmost soft and responsive and at the same time checks on the shoe weight also. The cushioning increases the shock absorption potential of the shoe along with comfort.

The most string feature of this shoe is that it uses the early stage meta rockered geometry. This technology minimizes the foot transition time and gives a smooth toe-off. This improves running efficiency.

The outsole of Clifton is made of EVA form with high abrasion rubber pods strategically placed to maximize the durability of the shoe and give a better grip. The use of less rubber on the outsole considerably reduces the shoe weight.

The upper of Clifton comes with an Engineered Mesh. The shoe fabric is soft, breathable, and highly durable. It comes with side embroideries with locks the mid-foot area to make the shoe more secure. Its collar and tongue padding make the shoe more comfortable.

Clifton 7 can be used for long-distance, road, and treadmill running and also for cross-training.

Running shoes similar to Hoka One One Clifton – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
BROOKS GLYCERIN 18

Brooks Glycerin 18 is our first preference for Hoka One One Clifton 6.

Both these shoes are designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches.

Glycerin, however, has a little more heel drop than Clifton, 10 mm, and slightly heavier than Clifton. This weight difference is not significant as it does not really impact your performance.

Glycerin has a super-soft cushioning owing to DNA Loft material in the midsole. Additionally, the Ortholite sock-liner is present which adds extra comfort.

Clifton has EVA foam present in the midsole which makes very cushy and highly shock absorbing.

Glycerin has an outsole made with blown rubber. The outsole design gives a smooth heel to toe transition.

Clifton has EVA foam with rubber pods placed strategically in the outsole. This renders better durability and traction of the shoe.

Glycerin has the upper made with 3D Fit Print. The plush fit adds to the flexibility and comfort.

The upper of Clifton is designed using an engineered mesh. This is a light-weight, breathable, and durable fabric.  The embroidery present on the midfoot makes the fit more secure.

Glycerin is used for long-distance, road, and treadmill running.

Clifton can also be used for long-distance, road, and treadmill running and cross-training.

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Very soft and cushy
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Lightweight.
  • Ortholite sock-liner is present.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off. Order the next size if you wear a thick sock.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)
NEW BALANCE FRESH FOAM BEACCON V2

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 is our next alternative for Clifton.

Beacon V2 is a light-weight  well-cushioned running shoe.

It is also a neutral running shoe for runners with a medium arch, same as Clifton.

The heel drop of Beacon V2 is 6mm, closest to that of Clifton.

Beacon is just a little lighter than Clifton.

The most remarkable feature of Beacon is the midsole design.

This has a  midsole designed with a thick layer of Fresh Foam ground contact material. The thick layer of cushioning makes the shoe very comfortable and shock absorbing. This Fresh Foam cushioning accounts for the light-weight of the shoe. In spite of the thick cushion, it doesn’t give a plush feel rather the feel is firm.

The midsole of Clifton has Eva Foam cushioning. This makes the shoe soft and responsive.

The outsole of Beacon has ground contact EVA Foam, with rubber pods placed strategically placed at heels and forefoot.  The minimize the shoe weight and makes it long-lasting.

Even Clifton also has an EVA Foam outsole with rubber pods.

The upper of Beacon V2 has a soft upper made with Engineered knit fabric.  It has Ultra Heel Construction for narrower rearfoot.  This keeps the heel intact and more secure.

The upper of Clifton is designed using an Engineered mesh which is durable, light, soft, and breathable.

The light-weight and shock absorption feature of the Fresh Foam Beacon V2 makes it suitable for speed and tempo run. This can also be used for long-distance, road, or treadmill running and cross-training.

Clifton is used for long-distance, road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with normal arches.
  • Good for neutral runner
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Firm rearfoot grip to keep the foot secure
  • Good shock absorption

 NEGATIVES

  • Some users may find narrow rearfoot design not very comfortable.
  • Early wear and tear signs may appear
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

NIKE EPIC REACT FLYKNIT 2

Nike Epic React FlyKnit 2 is our next alternative to Hoka One One Clifton 6.

Like Clifton, this is also a neutral running shoe.

It weighs around 8.7oz/ 247 gm, approx the same as Clifton.

The heel from of FlyKnit is 10 mm, a little more than Clifton.

What makes it different is the presence of React Foam in the midsole.

The React Foam gives an extra bounce to the shoe while keeping the weight of the shoe light.   This springy action makes the shoe very reactive.

The midsole of Clifton is made using the  EVA Foam. The midsole is very soft and responsive.

Nike Epic has React Foam in the outsole area. This is very durable and gives an adequate grip.

Clifton has an outsole made with Eva Foam.

The upper of Nike Epic React FlyKnit uses the FlyKnit upper. It snugs to your foot with minimum design. The only design present is the Nike overlay. The FlyKnit upper is very comfortable and breathable.

The upper of Clifton is designed using a highly durable and breathable engineered fabric.

Epic React can be used for long-distance running at a moderate pace, marathon. It is mostly used for road or treadmill running.

Clifton is used for long-distance, road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Exceptionally bounce and highly responsive
  • Lightweight
  • Soft and comfortable FlyKnit upper
  • Durable React Foam outsole
  • Stylish
  • Available in vibrant color

 NEGATIVES

  • The React Foam outsole may not give enough traction at freezing temperatures.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

ASICS CUMULUS 22

Asics Cumulus 22 is our next alternative to Clifton 7.

It is a neutral running shoe for runners with normal arches. It can also be used by underpronated runners with high arches.

The heel drop in Cumulus is 10 mm and weighs around 7.6oz/215g, slightly lighter than Clifton.

The midsole of Cumulus is designed using the FlyteFoam Propel and FlyteFoam Midsole Technologies.  Together they make the shoe lightweight and springy. There is a layer of SpevaFoam 45 Lasting feature which adds extra bounce in each step. Cumulus has specially designed gel units under the fore-foot and under the heels.  These gel units act as shock absorbers and add comfort on landing on the ground.  There is an additional Ortholite sock-liner which adds more comfort underfoot.

The midsole of Clifton is made using the EVA foam. This makes the shoe weight light, soft, and responsive.

The outsole of Cumulus is made with AHAR rubber. It makes the shoe flexible, soft, and long-lasting.

The outsole of Clifton is mostly EVA Foam with rubber pods strategically placed for better grip and life of the shoe.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using a 3D Engineered mesh. The upper is almost seamless.  The upper gives very good support to the forefoot. The added advantage in Cumulus is the presence of the reflective material on the upper, which increases its visibility in the dim light area.

The upper of Clifton 7 is made with highly durable and breathable engineered mesh. The embroidery on the sides of the shoe locks the midfoot area.

Cumulus is mostly used for everyday training and road running.

Clifton 7 is mostly used for long/short distance running, road or treadmill running, and also for daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Lightweight.
  • Good forefoot support
  • Gel units underfoot act as shock absorbers.
  • Available in a wide range of colors

 NEGATIVES

  •  Sizing seems to be a bit off. Some runners may find it running small.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
NIKE AIR ZOOM PEGASUS 36

We have Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 next in our list.

Pegasus is the most widely used running shoes and a super favorite runner amongst runners.

It is a neutral running shoe for medium to high arch support like Clifton 7.

The weight of Pegasus falls in the same range to Clifton, however, the heel drop in 10 mm, a little more than Clifton.

The unique feature of Nike Air-Zoom Pegasus is its midsole.

It has a layer of Air-Zoom unit that runs below the sole all through the shoe. You can imagine this as a thick pillow of air below the sole. To supplement this there is an additional layer of cushion provided by the CT Foam.  This unit makes the midsole very responsive and shock absorbing.

The midsole of Clifton is designed using the EVA foam. The midsole is soft and responsive.

The outsole of Pegasus is rubber with rubber pods placed appropriately for better traction.

The outsole of Clifton is made with EVA Form with rubber pods.

The upper of Pegasus is made with the flymesh fabric. This is a soft, durable, and breathable material.  It provided foot ventilation and prevent heat accumulation. Pegasus 36 has a narrowed heel counter for better heel grip. It has a slimmer tongue and heel collar which reduces the shoe weight. The shoelace is intact using Nike’s Flywire, giving a secure and tight fit when you are running at high speed. Pegasus comes with a new aerodynamic design which enhances speed.

The upper of Clifton is designed using a light-weight and breathable engineered mesh.

Pegasus can be used for medium-paced long-distance running. It is mostly used for running on the hard surfaces – road, treadmill, and even hard surface trail.

Clifton 7  can be used for daily training, long or short distance running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with medium arches.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Good shock absroption
  • The aerodynamic design adds acceleration.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Durable
  • Well-ventilated
  • Comes in attractive colors
  • Good for runners suffering from Achilles Tendinitis and calf pain.

 NEGATIVES

  • The slimmer tongue may give lacing pressure.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

MIZUNO WAVE RIDER 23

Mizuno Wave Rider 23 is the next shoe in our list.

Wave Rider 23 is best for neutral runners but works well for runners who are slightly underpronated to slightly overpronated runners.

Clifton on the other hand is most suitable for a neutral runner.

The help drop of Wave Rider is 12mm, more than Clifton.

The weight of Wave Rider is  9.6 oz/272g approximately the same as Clifton.

The striking difference lies in the midsole design of Wave Rider.

The midsole of Wave Rider consists of U4ic and U4icX foam. The U4icX foam is present in the heel region for extra softness.  Also, a thin layer of U4icX foam runs all though the sole unit adding more softness and comfort.  The Wave Rider has the plastic Pebax wave plate which gives a firm and stable feel.

The midsole of Clifton is made with the EVA Foam for a softer and comfortable feel.

The outsole of Wave Rider is made using blown rubber. The rubber on the forefoot is softer than that of the heel. The multiple grooves present on the outsole makes the shoe flexible and ensures great comfort.

The outsole of Clifton has EVA Foam with rubber pods for better traction.

Wave Rider 23 comes with the appropriate upper than its previous version. It is light-weight and breathable.

The upper of Clifton is made using an engineered mesh and the fabric is soft, light-weight, and breathable.

The Wave Rider 23 can be used for every day running and even for long-distance running.

Clifton 6 is used for treadmill running, road or treadmill running, and daily training.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Lightweight
  • Responsive
  • Suitable for neutral runners but also support mild underpronation and mild overpronation
  • Firm feel on the sole due to the plastic Pebax wave plate
  • The upper is breathable than its previous version.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some user find the shoe to be little narrow.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

NEW BALANCE FRESH FOAM 1080 v10

The New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 V10 is our next preference.

This is a neutral running shoe much like Clifton.

The heel drop is 8mm very close to that of Clifton and weighs around 9.5 oz/269 g.

This has an updated Fresh Foam midsole and delivers enhanced softness and rebound than its previous version. The rocker shaped midsole really makes the strides faster and smoother. It has an Ortholite sock-liner for added comfort. The outer edges of the outsole and midsole is rounded to give better support in dirt and slippery surfaces.

Clifton has the midsole designed using the EVA Foam, givig it the right combination of cushioning and rebound.

The upper Fresh Foam 1080 is designed using the Engineered HYPOKNIT. This is soft and breathable and maintains the temperature of the foot. The UltraHeel design of the rear gives a more secure fit and make it more comfortable.

Clifton has upper designed using engineered mesh with embroidery on both sides giving comfort and secure fit.

Fresh Foam 1080 can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running. However, it is not very suitable fr tempo runs.

Clifton can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and comfortable
  • Lightweight
  • Good for runners with neutral pronation.
  • Secure rear foot fit due to the 3D heel design
  • The upper gives a superior fit.

 NEGATIVES

  • The toebox takes a couple of weeks to expand

We chose Altra Escalante 2.5 as the next alternative to Clifton 7.

This is also a neutral shoe same as Clifton.

It is a zero drop shoe very close to Clifton’s 5 mm heel drop.

Escalante has the midsole is designed using Altra Ego. The Altra Ego gives a good energy return and makes the shoe more responsive and durable. It also has Inner Flex to add flexibility to the shoe. The FOOTSHAPE design takes the natural design of the foot to give ultra comfort. The midsole design makes the landing very soft and the springy toe-off makes the run more energetic.

Clifton has the midsole designed using the EVA Foam.

Escalante 2.5 outsole uses the  FootPod technique to follow the construction of the human foot. This gives very good flexibility to the foot.

The outsole of Clifton is designed using the EVA Foam.

The upper of Escalante comes with an engineered knit mesh. It snugs to the foot and gives a sock-like feel. It has a PU insole for a softer feel. It uses the Dri-Lex and Dri-Freeze Heel Liner for better heat control.

The upper of Clifton is designed using highly durable and breathable fabric. The embroideries on the side of the shoe give secure locking of the midfoot.

Escalante can be used for running on roads and tracks, daily training, and also for gym training.

Clifton is used mostly for long-distance road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft cushion
  • Spring and adds bounce
  • Light-weight
  • Breathable
  • Manages the temperature of the sole
  • Designed for neutral runners

 NEGATIVES

The Saucony Kinvara 11 is our next preference for Hoka One One Clifton.

It is a light-weight neutral running shoe.

The weight of Kinvara is very close to Clifton.

Even the heel drop is 4mm closest to the 5 mm heel drop of Clifton.

The PWRRUN  midsole of Kinvara gives a soft cushioning and responsiveness.

Clifton too has a soft and responsive cushioning owing to the EVA foam midsole.

The outsole of Kinvara uses high abrasion rubber for a more durable outsole.

The outsole of Clifton is mostly EVA Foam with rubber pods placed strategically for better shoe-life and traction.

Kinvara has an upper designed using the  FORMFIT technology to give a customized fit. The Engineered Mesh used in the upper is very breathable. It has a padded tongue and collar to give more stability.

Clifton has an upper designed using a highly breathable and durable engineered mesh.

Kinvara can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running.

Clifton can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and comfortable
  • Responsive
  • Breathable fabric
  • Upper of the shoe gives a customized fit
  • Stylish look

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off.

Nike Zoom  Pegasus Turbo 2 is our next alternative to Clifton 7.

It is a light-weight super reactive shoe.

This shoe is well-suited for the neutral runners, similar to Clifton.

The weight of Turbo 2 is around 7.2 oz/204 g, which is slightly lesser than that of Clifton.

The heel drop of Turbo 2 is 10 mm, more than that of Clifton.

The most significant feature is the midsole design of Turbo 2.

It uses the ZoomX foam on top of a layer of React Foam. The ZoomX foam is the lightest and most energy-efficient foam that Nike has ever made. As per Nike, ZoomX gives you the energy return as much as 85%. The ZoomX and React Foam together make Turbo 2 very bouncy and energy-efficient. The angled heel design optimizes the initial touchdown and makes a smooth transition.

The midsole of Clifton is of EVA Foam.

The outsole of Turbo 2 has the layer of the React Foam with rubber. The rubber patches are present under the heel and toe region and a thin strip of rubber running along the sides of the sole. The rubber adds to the grip and gives good traction on wet surfaces.

The outsole of Clifton is made using the EVA foam to add flexibility and durability.

The upper of Turbo2 is made with a very thin fabric. The pores on the fabric make the shoe more breathable. The lacing system is simplified as the Flywire has been removed and just uses the regular laces. The only padding present here is at the sides of the heel collar.

The upper of Clifton is made with a light-weight and soft engineered mesh.

Turbo 2 can be used to run long-distance running, marathon running, and daily training. It is very suited to run on the road, treadmill, or tracks.

Clifton 7 can be used for long-distance running, road, or treadmill running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Maximum energy return
  • Better traction
  • Lightweight.
  • Breathable and light upper
  • Available in attractive colors

 NEGATIVES

  • Upper could have been little thicker.

FAQs

Is Hoka Clifton good for plantar fasciitis?

No Hoka One One Clifton is not the right shoes for Plantar Fasciitis.

Which is better Hoka Clifton or Bondi?

Well, Hoka’s Clifton and Bondi are two different shoes each having their individual features.

Clifton comes in the line with balanced cushioning. It is soft, cushioned, and at the same time responsive and shock absorption.

Bondi has a thick cushion and delivers the ultra-plush ride. 

So it mostly depends on the user’s preference and requirements.

You can see here for a detailed comparison between Clifton and Bondi.

 

Which Hoka shoes have the most cushion?

Bondi is the best-cushioned shoe offered by Hoka. In fact, it is referred to as “mega cushioned” shoe. There is a thick layer of EVA foam cushioning that delivers the ultra-plush ride to the runners.

Is Hoka Clifton good for bad knees?

Clifton is a balanced running shoe. It is lightweight, cushioned, responsive, and gives great shock absorption. 

The shock absorption reduces the impact of running.

The minimal impact of running makes it easy on the bad knees.

So, yes Clifton is definitely a very good option if you have a bad knee.

What kind of a running shoe is Hoka Clifton?

Clifton is one of the most popular shoes from Hoka One One. 

It is a light-weight neutral running shoe. This is well suited for runners with medium to high arches. 

It comes with a low drop.

The shoe is designed to offer ultimate softness and comfort, maximum shock absorption, and keeping the response of the shoe high.  The maximum shock absorption reduces the impact of running and the response increases the running efficiency. 

The versatility of the shoe comes from the fact that it can be used for long-distance, short-distance, high or low pace running.

Will Hoka Clifton help me with my Achilles Tendonitis?

The Clifton has a low heel drop, 5 mm. The low drop does not make it very suitable for Achilles Tendinitis. For Achilles Tendinitis it is more suitable to opt for shoes that have a heel drop more than 8mm.

Is Hoka Clifton better than Brooks Ghost?

This is again a debatable topic. 

Each of these shoes has its own unique feature. 

Clifton is a lightweight, well-cushioned, responsive, and shock absorption. 

Ghost on the other hand has a very soft and protective cushioning. The segmented scratch-pad under the forefoot adds to better shock absorption and flexibility of the shoe.

So it becomes very difficult to pick a direct winner amongst Clifton and Ghost. 

It is ultimately the runner’s choice and the experience that matters when you are comparing two equally awesome running shoes.

 

 

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Here are the alternatives of Hoka One One Clifton. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Clifton. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Here are the alternatives of Hoka One One Clifton. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Clifton. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Related Posts

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

Top 10 Best Adidas Solarboost Alternatives That Are Most Suited For You [2020]

Top 10 Best Adidas Solarboost Alternatives That Are Most Suited For You [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

Adidas Solarboost is one of the most preferred running shoes. It is light-weight, cushioned, and responsive, the most needed features in a running shoe. Adidas Solarboost is designed for neutral runners. Another variant of Solarboost, the Adidas Solarboost ST is specifically designed for overpronation.

To find the alternatives for Solarboost, out baseline version in Adidas Solarboost 19.

The Best Adidas Solar Boost 19 Alternative

Last update on 2020-10-26 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes the same as Solarboost.
  • 10 mm drop which is the same as Solarboost.
  • Very thick cushioning
  • Both can be used for road and treadmill running.

Let’s understand Adidas Solar Boost

Before we take a dive into the various alternatives for Adidas Solarboost 19, let us first take a moment to understand Solarboost.

Solarboost is a perfect combination of cushioned and responsive running shoes.

This is essentially designed for neutral runners. Its other version on Solarboost ST is more of a stability shoe and designed for overpronated runners.

The shoe weight is 11oz/ 312g and the heel drop is 10 mm.

The midsole of the Solarboost is made with a thick layer of Boost. The softness and bounce in the shoe is owing to the Boost midsole. It also features the Torsion system and Guide Rails. The GuideRails running across the edges of the shoe. The Guide Rail reduces the lateral motion of the foot and adds to the stability of the feet.

The outsole of the shoe is made with the Continental rubber. This outsole has extremely good traction support even on the wet surfaces. The stretch web pattern present makes the shoe very flexible.

The upper of the Solarboost is designed using the engineered mesh and bears a NASA inspired design.  The shoe has extremely good breathability.

Solarboost is a versatile shoe and can be used for running, training, cross-training, and indoor and outdoor sports. It can be used for running on surfaces like road, treadmill, and tracks. The cushioned and springy midsole makes it suitable to run for long-distance and you can try both high speed and medium speed running.

Running shoes similar to Adidas Solar Boost – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
BROOKS GLYCERIN 18

Brooks Glycerin 18 is our first choice for Adidas Solarboost.

They both are neutral running shoes having the same heel drop, 10mm.

Brooks Glycerin 18 weighs approx. 9oz/255.1g which is slightly lighter than the Solarboost.se

The main difference lies in the cushioning of these shoes.

The midsole of Glycerin 18 uses DNA LOFT. This gives extra soft cushioning and plush ride.  Brooks’s Omega Flex Grooves in the midsole improves the responsiveness and flexibility of the shoes. The presence of Ortholite sock-liner is the cherry on the cake.

The midsole of Solarboost has Boost midsole. This makes the shoe well-cushioned and gives high energy return. The Torsion system and Guide rails gives better stability of the foot.

The outsole of Glycerin uses blown rubber on the forefoot and HRR rubber, a high abrasive rubber, on the heel.  This combination of rubber used on the outsole keeps the shoe-weight light without compromising on the flexibility, durability, and traction of the shoes.

The outsole of Solarboost is designed using Continental rubber and shows a stretch-web pattern. This makes Solarboost highly durable and flexible.

The upper of Brooks Glycerin comes with an updated double jacquard mesh to make the fit more flexible and breathable. It uses 3D Print technology to give for a seamless and secure fit.

Solarboost uses an engineered mesh on its upper and gives very good breathability to the shoes.

Brooks Glycerin can be used for running long and short distances. It can be used for road and treadmill running.

Solarboost can be used for running the long and short distances, cross-training, and other sports. It can be used for surfaces like road, treadmill, and tracks.

 

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultimate cushioning
  • Lightweight
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Comes with Ortholite sock liner
  • Responsive

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off. Order .1/2 size bigger if you are keen on wearing a thicker socks
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)

ADIDAS ULTRABOOST 20

Adidas UltraBoost 20 is our next match for Solarboost.

Both these shoes are from Adidas boost line of shoes and have very much in common.

They both are light-weight, incredibly soft, and responsive running shoes.

Both are neutral running shoes weighing around 11oz/312g and heel drop 10 mm.

They both have the Boost midsole. The Boost is like a small capsule capable of returning energy. This makes the shoe more responsive and enhances performance.

Apart from the boost midsole, Solarboost has an additional Guide rail that reduces the lateral movement of the foot.

Both have the same outsole made with Continental rubber and have a stretch-web pattern. The outsole is perfect for adequate traction and flexibility.

The upper of UltraBoost is made with the PrimeKnit + material.  The upper snugs like a sock giving a more customized and secure fit. The upper is almost seamless which makes it comfortable to wear the shoe.

The upper of Solarboost uses an engineered mesh and has a NASA inspired design.  The material of the upper is capable of keeping the foot ventilated.

The usability of both UltraBoost and Solarboost is very versatile. They can be used for long or short distance running. You can try a high-speed tempo or a medium speed long run with it. They both can handle running on road, treadmill or tracks. They can also be used for cross-training, gym wear, indoor or outdoor sports. In fact, they can be used for wearing the whole day.

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultimate cushioning
  • Highly responsive.
  • Good for runners with normal arches.
  • neutral running shoe
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Available in 27 attractive colors
  • Good traction on dry and wet surfaces
  • Multipurpose running shoe

 NEGATIVES

  • The toe box may be a bit low for some runners.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

ASICS GEL NIMBUS -22

The next shoe that we have on our list is the Asics Gel Nimbus 22.

Asics Gel Nimbus is also a neutral running shoe for runners having a medium arch.

The heel drop of Nimbus is 10 mm and it weighs around 10.9 oz/ 309 g, same as that of Solarboost.

The midsole of Nimbus has a Gel-based cushioning. There is an additional layer of FLYTEFOAM cushion. The double layer of cushioning makes the shoe very soft, shock-absorbing, and flexible.

The midsole of Solarboos has a Boost midsole.  The boost midsole is capable of returning energy back. This makes the shoe very responsive and enhances performance. It also has the guide rails running around the edges of the shoe. These guide rails reduce the lateral movement of the foot upon landing and maintain foot stability.

The outsole of  Nimbus is made with AHAR rubber. The deep grooves design on the outsole. This gives stability and smooth ride and heel to toe transition.

Solarboost has a Continental rubber outsole with a stretch-web pattern.  This traction support is very good in the dry and wet areas. The stretch-web pattern adds to the flexibility of the shoe.

The upper of Nimbus is made with an engineered mesh. The fabric is soft, flexible, and gives a secure fit.

The TRRUSTIC technology used under the arch of the shoe makes the shoe more durable and stable.

The upper of Solarboos is made with an engineered mesh and has a NASA inspired design. The fabric of the shoe shows high breathability.

Nimbus is mostly used for long-distance running and can also be used for trail running.

Solarboost on the other hand is a versatile shoe and can be used for long or short distances and also on various surfaces like road, treadmill, or tracks. This can also be used for gym and other sports.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Light-weight
  • Very good cushioning and shock absorption.
  • Stylish
  • Good for road and trail running.

 NEGATIVES

  • The shoe upper could have been slight;y thicker.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

BROOKS GHOST 13

Our next well-suited alternative is the Brooks Ghost 13.

Brooks Ghost 13 is a light-weight running shoe with super soft cushioning along with flexibility and springy action, something which is expected out of a running shoe.

Ghost is a neutral running shoe for runners with medium to high arches, just like Solarboost.

The heel drop is 12 mm which is very close to that of Solarboost’s 10mm heel drop.

The weight of Ghost 13 is 8.8oz/294.5g slightly lesser than Solarboost.

The midsole of Ghost 13 has BioMogo DNA and DNA Loft cushioning.  Together they give very protective and soft cushion without losing responsiveness and durability. In Ghost 13, DNA Loft is extended from the heel right up to the forefoot. This gives an easy transition from landing to toe-off.

In Solarboost, the midsole is a thick layer of Boost. Boost gives high energy return, shock absorption, and soft cushion under the foot. The presence of the Torsion system and Guide rails maintains the stability of the foot upon landing.

The outsole of Ghost is made with blown rubber. It uses the Segmented Crash-pad pattern on the forefoot gives maximum shock- absorption and maintains the stability of the foot. It provides an easy heel to toe transition.

The outsole of Solarboost is made with the Continental rubber and demonstrates a stretch-web pattern.  The design of the outsole maximizes the durability of the shoe and improves grip especially on the wet surfaces.

The upper of Ghost 13 is designed using an Engineered Air Mesh.  This gives a secure fit and keeps the breathability of the shoe.  The 3D Print technology used on the upper gives a personalized fit.

The upper of Solarboost uses design inspired by NASA and uses the engineered mesh making the shoe comfortable and breathable.

Ghost is mostly used for long-distance running across surfaces like road and treadmill.  It can also be used for cross-training.

Solarboost is a multipurpose shoe. Along with running, it can be used for cross-training, sports, and gym.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and protective cushioning
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Lightweight.
  • Designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Available in many shades
  • Can be used for walking

 NEGATIVES

  •  Sizing seems to be a bit off.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

HOKA ONE ONE BONDI 6

The next shoe that we have on our list is the Hoka One One Bondi 6.

Bondi 6 falls in the category of running shoe having plush cushioning designed for ultra-soft experience.

It is a neutral running shoe the same as SolarBoost.

The weight of Bondi is very much the same as SolarBoost, but the heel drop is very different.  Bondi has a heel drop  4 mm whereas the heel drop of SolarBoost is 10mm.

The main difference lies in there cushioning.

Hoka Bondi is the most cushioned shoe from Hoka. Bondi uses compressed EVA Foam in the midsole.  This gives a supremely plush feel and excellent shock absorption at the same time keeps a tab on the shoe weight.  The early-stage meta-rocker design geometry used in these shoes gives a rocking motion to the feet and drives it forward. This gives better running efficiency.

SolarBoost comes with a Boost midsole along with Torsion system and Guide rails.  This gives a springy like motion and shock-absorption.

The outsole of Bondi 6 is made with blown rubber present at the most impacted areas, generally under the forefeet and heels. It has a groove pattern outsole which adds to the shoe flexibility.

SolarBoost has a Continental rubber outsole and bears a stretch web pattern.

The upper of Bondi is made with an engineered mesh. The fabric used here is premium and making the shoe very comfortable and breathable. The toe-box has ample of space.  The heel counter locks in the back of the foot giving a secure fit.

The upper of SolarBoost is designed using an engineered mesh.  It is very comfortable and breathable.

Bondi 6 can be used for long-distance running on surfaces like road and treadmill.

SolarBoost can be used for running long or short distance running at high speed or moderate. It can be used for running on road, treadmill to tracks. It can also be used for cross-training, gym, and sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • Supremely plush cushioning
  • Good for runners with low to medium arches.
  • Good for neutral runners 
  • Lightweight.

 NEGATIVES

  • The upper could have been more sturdy
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

ALTRA TROIN 4.5 PLUSH

The Torin 4.5 Plush belongs to the Altra Premium line of running shoes.

The name itself says “Plush”, which gives the feel of supremely soft cushion when you run in them.

They are designed for a neutral runner with high arches, the same as Solarboost.

The weight of Torin is 10.1oz/286 g, slightly less than Solarboost.

The Torin 4.5 is a zero drop shoe (heel to toe drop is 0-4mm). This is very different from Solarboost that has a 10 mm heel drop.

As a zero drop  shoe, Torin has the heel and toe very much at the same level from the ground. This gives the low-impact while running. It also makes Troin a good running shoe for trail running.

Torin 4.5 Plush uses the Quantic midsole.  The material gives the ultimate cushioning and rebound, at the same time it keeps a tab on the shoe weight. As a result the ride comfortable and bouncy.  The presence of Perf-X insole adds t the cushioning and underfoot experience.

The Solarboost has a Boost midsole that is capable of giving a good energy return and maximizing the shock absorption.  The result is a comfortable ride and improved performance.

The upper of Torin 4.5 Plush is designed using engineered knit. There is sufficient space at the forefoot. The wider space at the toe-box makes it very suitable for running uphill or downhill.

The upper of SolarBoost is designed using engineered mesh. The upper bears a NASA inspired design. The fabric is soft, light-weight, and breathable.

Torin uses the unique FOOTPOD technology in its outsole. This technology follows the natural construction of the foot and moves and bends accordingly.

The outsole of SolarBoost is made using the Continental rubber and shows a stretch-web pattern.

Torin 4.5 Plush is a great choice for long-distance running and trail running.

SolarBoost can be used for long or short distance running on surfaces like road, treadmill, or tracks. It can also be used for cross-training, gym and sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultra-plush cushioning
  • Responsive
  • Lightweight.
  • Ample room space for forefeet, well suited for wide feet runner.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Good for long-distance running as well as for trail running.

 NEGATIVES

  • The extra soft midsole may not be very supportive for heavy runners. 
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

Altra Escalante 2.5-min

Altra Escalante 2.5 is out next candidate for SolarBoost alternative.

This is also a neutral running shoe as Solarboost.

This is a zero drop shoe unlike the 10 mm heel drop of Solarboost.

The midsole of Escalante is designed using the Altra Ego and Inner Flex.  The Altra Ego gives a high energy return and makes the shoe responsive and durable. The Inner Flex adds to the flexibility of the shoe. This combination makes the landing very soft and springy take-off of the toe, thus increasing the running efficiency.  The midsole also uses the FOOTSHAPE technology which takes the natural shape of the human foot making the run very personalized and comfortable.

SolaBoost has Boost midsole accompanied with Guide rails and torsion system. Together they make the run comfortable, springy, and stable.

The outsole of Escalante uses FOOTPOD technology. This technique makes the shoe capable to follow the design of the foot.  This makes the ride flexible and responsive.

The outsole of SolarBoost is designed using the Continental rubber and shows a stretch web pattern.

The upper of Escalante is made with an engineered knit mesh that snugs to the foot giving a sock-like feel. It also has PU Insole to add to the comfort and give a plush feel in every step.  The Dri-Lex and Dri-Freeze Heel Liner are present to give a proper heat control to the foot and maintain the temperature inside the shoe.

The upper of Solarboost is designed using an engineered mesh and has a NASA inspired design. The breathability of the shoe upper is outstanding.

The Altra Escalante can be used for running on roads, tracks, and also for cross-training and gym wear.

SolarBoost is a perfect example of a multipurpose shoe. You can try running high-speed or moderate pace and be it long distance or short, SolarBoost serves all.  Running can be done on a road, track, or treadmill.  Other than that Solarboost can be used for cross-training, gym, and other sports too.

+ POSITIVES

  • Cushioned and comfortable
  • Bouncy
  • Good for the neutral runner
  • High breathability
  • Heat control of the sole

 NEGATIVES

Hoka One One Rincon 6 is our next alternative.

This is also a neutral running shoe like Adidas Solarboost.

The heel drop is 5 mm and the weight is 8 oz, lesser than that of SolarBoost.

The midsole is designed using the compressed EVA Foam cushioning.  This gives Hoka  Rincon a balanced cushioning. This makes the midsole light-weight and gives a soft feel to the foot. The early-staged meta rocker geometry design makes smooth and fast heel-strike to toe-off motion.

The midsole of SolarBoost has Boost full shoe length. This along with the Torsion system and Guide rails makes the shoe comfy, soft, bouncy, and foot stability.

The outsole of Rincon has high abrasion rubber present on the most impacted areas i.e under the front foot and heels. Using the rubber strategically reduces the weight of the shoe.

The outsole of SolarBoost is made up of Continental rubber and demonstrates a stretch web pattern.

The upper of Rincon is made with a light-weight single-layered mesh. This provides high breathability.

The upper of SolarBoost is made using the engineered mesh and gives high breathability.

Rincon can be used for road running. The high cushioning makes it suitable for both long and short distance running.

SolarBoost is multipurpose that can be used for running across different distances and across various surfaces. It can also be used for gym, cross-training and sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • Highly cushioned and comfortable
  • Responsive
  • Good for the neutral runner
  • Lightweight
  • High breathability

 NEGATIVES

  • The shoe may be slightly tight for wide-foot runners

Nike Air Zoom Vomero 14 is our next alternative.

This is a neutral running shoe with a heel drop 10 mm the same as that of Adidas SolarBoost.

The weight of Vomero falls in the same range as that of SolarBoost.

The midsole is designed for an ultra-plush ride with greater responsiveness to the shoe. It has a full-length Nike’s Zoom unit running from heel to toe. The zoom unit along and the React technology together guarantees a soft, smooth, and snappy ride.

The midsole of SolarBoost is designed using a thick layer of Boost. The softness and bounce in the shoe are owing to the Boost midsole. It also features the Torsion system and Guide Rails.

The outsole of Vomero uses hard carbon in the entire outsole reason that gives improved traction.

The outsole of Solarboost is made up of Continental rubber and show a stretch-web pattern and gives very good flexibility and traction to the shoe.

The upper of Vomero is made with a sleek engineered mesh designed for longer durability and support. The Dynamic Fit technology used here combines with Flywire and soft foam to give better support to the midfoot. The forefoot space is very roomy and even has wider toe-box. The heel collar comes with foam pods which gives better support to the rear foot.

The upper of SolarBoost is designed using the engineered mesh and has a  NASA inspired design. It is designed for better breathability.

The Vomero 14 is mostly used for running on road or treadmill. You can run in these at a varied pace and can be used for short to moderate distance running.

The Adidas SolarBoost can be used for running, training, cross-training, and sports.

 

 

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultra-plush
  • Responsive
  • Soft upper
  • Good grip
  • Wide toe box.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off.

Adidas Solar Glide 19 is our next alternative for Adidas SolarBoost.

The Solar Glide is designed for neutral runners for high arches, the same as SolarBoost.

It weighs around 283g slightly less that SolarBoost.

The heel drop is 10 mm the same as SolarBoost.

The midsole of Solar Glide is very much similar to that of SolarBoost.

Solar Glide has a full-length Boost midsole which gives better energy return and shock absorption, same as SolarBoost. Both these shoes use a Torsion system for more flexibility and easy heel to toe transition.  Solar Glide uses the Solar Propulsion Rail whereas SolarBoost use the Guide rail for providing a stable run.

Even the outsole of Solar Glide and SolarBoost uses Continental rubber and has the stretch web pattern running through the outsole. This gives better durability and traction.

The upper of Solar Glide is made with an engineered mesh and is highly breathable and flexible. This has a Haptic print overlay for lateral support.

the upper of SolarBoost is made with an engineered mesh and gives high breathability. It also bears a NASA inspired design.

Both SolarBoost and Solar Glide can be used for road and treadmill running. They can be used daily training, and long and short distances running. SolarBoost can also be used for cross-training, gym, and other sports.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Balanced cushioning
  • Good energy return
  • Lightweight.
  • Very durable.
  • Traction support for wet and dry surfaces
  • Available in attractive colors.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some runner may find lack of heel support.

FAQs

What is the difference between Adidas SolarBoost and UltraBoost?

Adidas SolarBoost and Ultraboost belong to the Boost line of shoes from Adidas.

The midsole and outsole wise they both are pretty much the same.  SolarBoost has additional Guide rails in the midfoot for the controlled movement of the foot.

The upper of these shoes are however different.

You can get more differences between them from here.

What is the difference between Adidas SolarBoost and Solar Glide?

Both SolarBoost and Solar Glide have the same midsole and outsole.

However, the upper of these shoes are different.

You can get more details about their differences here.

Are Adidas Solar Boost good for running?

Yes, Adidas SolarBoost is an excellent running shoe.

It is light-weight and well cushioned to provide the utmost softness and comfort.

This boost midsole gives good bounce and maximum shock absorptions.

Overall it improves your running performance and gives better results.

 

What are the best Adidas running shoes?

Some of the best running shoes from Adidas are:

  • Adidas Ultraboost 20
  • Adidas SolarBoost 19
  • Adidas SolarBoost ST 19 (stability shoe)
  • Adidas Solar Glide 18
  • Adidas Adizero Boston 8
  • Adidas  SL 20

 

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Here are the alternatives of Adidas Solarboost. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Solarboost. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Here are the alternatives of Adidas Solarboost. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Solarboost. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Related Posts

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.