10 Best Running Shoes For Retrocalcaneal Bursitis [2022]

10 Best Running Shoes For Retrocalcaneal Bursitis [2022]

[aff_disclosure]

Retrocalcaneal bursitis is a painful condition and can develop in anybody. It is the inflammation or irritation of the fluid-filled sack in between the heel bone and the Achilles Tendon.

People who run a lot or have increased their exercise intensity suddenly are at more risk of developing such a condition. One of the main ways to stay comfortable with such a condition is to have your heel elevated a bit. This releases any pressures on your Achilles Tendons.

So, a proper running shoe for this condition should have a higher heel stack, a well-cushioned heel area, and should not be narrow/tight fitting.

One of the running shoes that fit all these criteria is ASICS Gel-Nimbus 24. It has an overall roomy fit, a heel-to-toe drop of 13mm for women and 10mm for men, and has a good amount of padding in the heel, collar, and tongue area.

Also, below we have prepared a list of 10 different running shoes that will suit different types of runners and all have the required features to deal with retrocalcaneal bursitis.

Without further ado, let’s check out the list of best running shoes for retrocalcaneal bursitis

10 Top Running Shoes For Retrocalcaneal Bursitis

1. ASICS Gel Nimbus 24

2. ASICS Novablast 2

3. Brooks Launch GTS 9

4. New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v12

5. Salomon SpeedCross 5

6. ON Cloudrunner

7. Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2

8. Brooks Hyperion Elite 3

9. Mizuno Wave Inspire 18

10. Saucony Endorphin Speed 2

Best Running Shoes for Retrocalcaneal Bursitis

Best Rectocalcaneal Bursitis Running Shoes (Detailed Review)

ASICS Gel Nimbus 24

Asics Gel-Nimbus 24
Asics Gel-Nimbus 24

Check Price!

Asics Gel-Nimbus 24 is the first running shoe on our list for retrocalcaneal bursitis. They are one of the most comfortable running shoes around and fit into the criteria of heel bursitis perfectly.

It is not a narrow shoe and is available in different widths as well for both women and men. Also, this shoe has a high heel drop. For this shoe, the heel drop is different for both genders.

However, irrespective of that, both the drop qualify for what is required for retrocalcaneal bursitis. For this, you would need a running shoe that can keep your heel slightly elevated.

Anything above 8mm is good for this purpose. Asics Gel-Nimbus has a heel-to-toe drop of 10mm for the men’s version and 13mm for the women’s version.

Also, the fitting of the heel is not snug and has plenty of room. This is important for a person suffering from heel bursitis as this can make the whole running experience more uncomfortable. It can also aggravate the condition.

The overall cushioning of the heel area is good and smooth. This doesn’t put much pressure on your heels. Also, being smooth, you will not have to deal with problems like blisters.

The padding of the collar and the tongue also keeps the ankle area more stable and provides you with a more comfortable running experience.

The cushioning of Asics Gel-Nimbus is also excellent. It has gel cushioning and FlyteFoam in its midsole. This makes it very good at shock-absorption and this also keeps your heel and ankle area comfortable.

Pros.

  • Good fit and style.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Available in different widths.
  • Higher drop is good for issues in the ankle, heels, or Achilles Tendon area.

Cons

  • May show early signs of wear and tear.

ASICS Novablast 2

Asics Novablast 2
Asics Novablast 2

Check Price!

ASICS Novablast 2 is a very comfortable running shoe. It has maximal cushioning that provides exceptional impact absorption.

One of the best things about Asics Novablast is that it has a heel stabilizer. It provides additional support to the foot by stabilizing the heel. This provides you with a more balanced ride. In other words, you will have lesser stress on your ankles and heels which is a good thing, if you are suffering from retrocalcaneal bursitis.

The heel drop of Asics Novablast is not as high as Asics Gel-Nimbus, however, it is still within the required minimum limit. The drop of Asics Novablast is 8mm for both men’s and women’s running shoes. This creates the required heel elevation and takes offload from Achilles’ tendons.

This is a good thing as if you have developed heel bursitis, then there may be a higher chance that you have got it due to a sudden increase in your activity or running levels.

If that is the case, then not only your heel bursae but also your Achilles’s tendons are at a higher risk of developing an injury. In other words, you are at a much higher risk of developing Achilles Tendonitis.

Apart from the 8mm drop and heel stabilization, the width of Asics Novablast is also good. It has a decent width from toe to heel and you will not feel snug while wearing this shoe.

Having a snug fit only increases the chances of worsening your bursitis. However, having a widish fit can make you feel more comfortable and you will be able to tackle your heel bursitis better.

Apart from being a supportive shoe for your bursitis, Asics Novablast is a great running shoe. It has a very grippy and wear-resistant outsole that will last for a long time.

The FlyteFoam Blast midsole is comfortable and lightweight. It is bouncy and highly responsive and provides you with a very efficient ride.

Pros

  • Very stylish.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Excellent shock absorption.
  • Great for ankle strain and Achilles weakness.

Cons

  • Toe-box depth is not good.

Brooks Launch GTS 9

Brooks Launch GTS 9
Brooks Launch GTS 9

Check Price!

This is another favorite shoe of mine. Brooks Launch GTS is a ‘support’ running shoe. It comes with Brooks proprietary GuideRails and it keeps your knees in the line of motion.

This is a running shoe for overpronating runners. This is the first shoe in this category that is a stable running shoe. The shoes that are provided above are of neutral category or support mild underpronation.

This is a very comfortable running shoe that is great for running shorter distances that are up to 10K. Also, they are a great shoe for walking, if you want to use them for that.

The drop of Brooks Launch GTS is 10mm. This is around 2mm more than the lowest drop permissible for a runner with retrocalcaneal bursitis.

Due to this drop, the pressure on your Achilles’s tendons and ankle joints is reduced. This will make your running with bursitis a bit more comfortable and you will also experience the pain lesser. Also, the extended pull tab will provide additional support to the Achilles area.

The heel area is padded well. It is smooth and devoid of any stitches. This makes it comfortable to wear even with bursitis. However, what I would have liked more was for the tongue to be more padded.

The tongue is like a neoprene tongue and doesn’t have much padding. It is not uncomfortable, but a padded one would have made a slight difference I feel.

The width of Brooks Launch GTS is good and is also available in two different widths, the medium width, and the wide width. This makes the fitting of the shoe very comfortable and will not bite into your feet.

The same goes for the heel area. This also has a decent width and will not have a hard grip on your heels.

The outsole of Brooks Launch GTS is made of high abrasive rubber and is very durable. It covers almost the entire sole and provides you with a very stable ride.

This is a very lightweight shoe and has a very responsive midsole. This adds a bit of zing to your feet and will make your ride that much peppier.

Pros

  • Lightweight.
  • Affordable.
  • Good for people with a bad back.
  • Excellent for foot issues like metatarsalgia and bunions.

Cons

  • Would have preferred a thicker tongue.
  • A slight more softness would have been better.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v12

New Balance 1080 v12
New Balance 1080v12

Check Price!

New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v12 is one of the cushiest running shoes around. The Fresh Foam X is softer, lighter, and more resilient than the Fresh Foam.

Also, it is great for running longer distances and is very stylish to look at…

Now I’m digressing…

How is New Balance 1080 beneficial for your retrocalcaneal bursitis?

Let’s find out…

Let’s start with one of the most important aspects of this shoe that will help you with your heel bursitis…It is the heel drop of this shoe.

New Balance 1080 has a heel drop of 8mm which is a good drop for retrocalcaneal bursitis. As mentioned earlier, this bursitis can develop due to increased activities.

This can also develop due to inflexibility of the foot. In that case, having a higher drop releases some of the stress from the Achilles tendons and other areas of the foot, giving you some relief from the bursitis pain.

Another important aspect of New Balance 1080 is the width of the shoe. First of all the overall fit of this shoe is wideish. Also, it is available in different widths making it comfortable for runners with different foot widths.

A snug fit especially in the heel area causes bursitis to aggravate and your pain may increase a lot. Having a decent width in the heels will lead you to have a more comfortable fit and a much more pleasurable running experience, even with bursitis.

The heel area is smooth and well-padded and is great for runners with bursitis. This will provide additional cushioning to the heel area and will keep you comfortable.

Also, the tongue of the New Balance 1080 is also well padded. This helps to keep the ankle joint stable and will help to reduce the pain to some extent.

The outsole of the shoe is made from durable rubber which enhances the lifespan of the shoe. This also keeps you stable on the roads while you are running. This has a good grip on surfaces whether wet or dry. The jacquard mesh is breathable and provides you with excellent stretch and comfort.

Pros

  • Very stylish.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Available in multiple widths.
  • Excellent cushioning.
  • Lightweight.
  • Good absorption.

Cons

  • Heavy.
  • Expensive.

Related: New Balance 1080v12 Vs 1080v11: What Changed?


Salomon SpeedCross 5

Salomon Speedcross 5
Salomon SpeedCross 5

Check Price!

Until now, the running shoes that we have presented for retrocalcaneal bursitis are all road running shoes. But it is not that only road runners suffer from this foot problem…trail runners also have to deal with similar problems…

This is why we thought to include a trail running shoe into the list and what better could be than Salomon SpeedCross 5. This is one of the most popular trails running shoes that have been around for some time.

But how does it helps with bursitis?

The drop of Salomon SpeedCross is 10mm. This is a very important feature of this shoe as it is one of the primary requirements for this foot condition.

This essentially elevates the heel taking off pressure from the Achilles and the calf area. This helps you to run more comfortably even with the bursitis pain.

Now let’s look at the heel area of the shoe itself. The fit of the heel is comfortable. It is not hugely wide, but comfortable and doesn’t create a pinch grip on your heels.

This makes it comfortable for runners with heel bursitis as a snug fit will make you more uncomfortable. Also, the added pressure from the snug fit will make the heel bursitis worse.

The heel area of this shoe is well padded. It is comfortable and smooth and will not rub against your feet to create blisters. It is also an additional layer that will act as an added protection to your heel area.

The tongue and also well padded providing additional stability to the ankle area. This may seem a minor thing, but this added cushioning actually makes your life that bit easier.

I only have one complaint with this shoe. It is not good for runners who have wide feet. It has a bit of a snug toe box that may not be very comfortable for long runs.

Pros

  • Excellent grip on the trails.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Long-lasting.
  • Shock absorbing.

Cons

  • Snug toe-box.

ON Cloudrunner

ON Cloudrunner
ON Cloudrunner

Check Price!

ON Cloudrunner is a very well-built running shoe that is good with cushioning and is great for longish distances. The fit is comfortable and the toe-box is not as pointed as the New Balance 1080.

One thing that I love about ON Cloudrunner, apart from its performance is its looks. It looks more like a lifestyle sneaker than a running shoe. So, you can comfortably wear them even for casual outings.

These shoes are very comfortable even on the inside which has a comfortable padding in the right places and a smooth finish devoid of any stitches and roughness.

Now let’s check if it has the required features of a running shoe suitable for retrocalcaneal bursitis…

First of all, the drop of ON Cloudrunner is around 9mm. This is just above the requirement of 8mm for heel bursitis. Also, not only does it have a heel elevation, but it is also great from a heel cushioning perspective. The cushioning of the heel is soft, impact-absorbent, and is great for heel strikers.

Also, this elevation is great if you have stiff calf muscles, and will take some load off them.

The cushioning at the heels is also good…it is soft and firm and is great for providing additional support to the heel area. Also, the fitting of the heel is not snug and is good for runners with heel bursitis.

If the fit of the heel was snug, it would have increased the discomfort that you already have or may have aggravated the condition.

Also, the collar and the tongue have a decent amount of padding and the collar area has a notch at the Achillis portion. This improves the overall Achilles support which will further enhance the comfort.

Pros

  • Excellent style.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Widish fit.
  • Excellent for Achilles problem.

Cons

  • Not good for long toes.

Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2

Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2
Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2

Check Price!

Nike ZoomX Invincible Run Flyknit 2 is a comparative newer model than the other ones like Nike Pegasus. However, these shoes have excellent cushioning and are in the maximal cushioning category.

Also, if you observe the midsole of Nike ZoomX Invincible Run, you will find that the midsole is a bit protruded backward like Hoka Clifton EDGE.

This improves the cushioning and impact resistance for heel strikers, who are more at risk of heel bursitis. Also, you will have a more comfortable ride wearing this amount of cushioning.

Although it may not show, the drop of Nike ZoomX Invincible Run is around 9mm. It is a good heel drop if you are suffering heel bursitis. This will help you take the pressure off that area and the Achilles and will make you have a more comfortable running experience.

The overall fit of this shoe is very comfortable. It is wideish and will not press down on any part of your foot, especially at the heels. The heel area having a good width doesn’t put additional pressure on the heels.

This is good as more pressure on your bursae will only increase the discomfort and will make you very uncomfortable.

Also, the tongue and the collar are well-padded to provide you with added ankle stability. The tongue is an oversized one that spreads on the top of your foot well and provides a gentle grip for a stable experience.

The outsole of Invincible Run is a rubberized midsole that is grippy and long-lasting. However, in more wear and tear, prone areas like the tip of the forefoot or the edge of the heels have a more durable rubber. This improves the durability of the shoe.

Overall, you will have a comfortable running experience while running in Nike ZoomX Invincible Run, even if you have heel bursitis.

Pros

  • Good fit and style.
  • Additional heel protection.
  • Comfortable fit.
  • Maximal cushioning.

Cons

  • Heavy.
  • Expensive.

Brooks Hyperion Elite 3

Brooks Hyperion Elite 3
Brooks Hyperion Elite 3

Check Price!

Brooks Hyperion Elite 3 is a running shoe that has a carbon fiber plate in its midsole. This improves the responsiveness of this shoe. Also, having a nitrogen-infused midsole is excellent for longer rides as it makes this shoe very lightweight.

The drop of Brooks Hyperion Elite is around 8mm. This is a good heel drop for heel bursitis as I’ve already mentioned earlier.

The heel is also decent as it doesn’t give you a snug fit. However, where it lacks is the padding in the collar and tongue area. Although the amount of padding that is present is not very bad, I would have preferred a bit more like that in the other Brooks shoes.

Also, I love the fit of Brooks Hyperion Elite as it has a wideish fit and will not bite into your feet. It has excellent wiggle space and a very comfortable and relaxed fit.

The outsole of Hyperion Elite is also very grippy and has durable rubber in the high wear and tear-prone areas.

Also, this is a very lightweight shoe and will not bog you down with your weight.

This is a unisex running shoe that is excellent for all neutral runners and is good for casual runs or long-distance running.

Pros

  • Good fit and style.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Unisex design.
  • Maximal cushioning.

Cons

  • Available in only one width.
  • Not enough padding on the tongue and collar.

Mizuno Wave Inspire 18

Mizuno Wave Inspire 18
Mizuno Wave Inspire 18

Check Price!

Mizuno Wave Inspire 18 is a stability running shoe. It is great for runners with overpronation and will keep your foot motion in check. It is a no-frills attached running shoe and is simple, comfortable, and lightweight.

This is one of the best qualities that I like about Mizuno…they have streamlined the shoe so much that it has only the things that will contribute to your performance. If it doesn’t then it is not present in this shoe.

The cushioning level of this shoe is also very good. It has those famous Mizuno waves that add an extra bit of peppiness under your heels. This is good for runners suffering from heel bursitis as the more cushioning you have the better.

Also, the drop of Mizuno Wave Inspire is around 12mm which is similar to that of Brooks Ghost or Adrenaline and provides you with a good amount of elevation so that your Achilles are not overloaded.

The fit of the heel is wideish and doesn’t pinch. Also, it is not so wide that it will provide you with a very bad fit and heel slip…

The cushioning of the heel area, the collar, and the tongue are also good and will provide you with additional stability.

The outsole of Mizuno Wave Inspire has durable rubber in the high wear and tear areas. This makes it durable and has an excellent grip. It will not make you unstable even on the wetter ground and is excellent for long-distance running as well.

Also, the upper has engineered mesh and is breathable, and will provide you with a cool and comfortable ride.

Pros

  • Lightweight.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Good for runners with overpronation.
  • Good for low arches.

Cons

  • Toe-box could have been wider.
  • A notch in the Achilles area would have been better.

Saucony Endorphin Speed 2

Saucony Endorphin Speed 2
Saucony Endorphin Speed 2

Check Price!

Saucony Endorphin Speed 2 is the last but not the least running shoe in our list of heel bursitis running shoes. It is excellent in providing comfort and is great for speed and performance.

Instead of a carbon plate, Endorphin Speed has a nylon plate that improves the snappiness of the sole. This provides you with a similar experience to the carbon plate shoe and is great for responsiveness and performance.

The drop of Saucony Endorphin Speed is around 8mm, which is the acceptable heel drop for anyone suffering from heel bursitis. The main reason for any heel drop is to take away the discomfort from the Achilles and the heel area.

However, a lower drop or a zero drop is not as effective and will add additional load on these areas. Having a drop of at least 8mm solves this problem and Saucony Endorphin Speed has that.

The heel and tongue area of Saucony Endorphin Speed has decent padding and will keep your ankle stable and will provide you with a decent amount of cushioning.

However, the amount of cushioning in those areas could have been better, this is what I felt. Also, the overall width of the shoe is decent. The heel area doesn’t have a suffocating grip on the heels and is great for runners with retrocalcaneal bursitis.

Overall it is a good shoe that will provide you with a decent performance.

Pros

  • Cushy and responsive.
  • True-to-size.
  • Good for any distance running.
  • Wideish fit.

Cons

  • Bulky.
  • The collar area could have used more cushioning.

FAQs

Can I run with retrocalcaneal bursitis?

You should not run with retrocalcaneal bursitis. If you are having pain, then it is better to stop all activities that will put pressure on the heel like walking, running, jumping, etc, until the pain subsides.

But what exactly is retrocalcaneal bursitis?

A bursa is a small fluid-filled sac that has a slippery texture. It forms a cushion and a lubricant and protects the bones from rubbing against the tendons, muscles, or skin.

There is a bursa behind both of the ankles near your heel bone (calcaneus). It is present in between the Achilles tendon and the heel bone. That is why it is called retrocalcaneal bursa or the bursa behind the heel.

When this bursa gets irritated due to any reason, it causes pain and discomfort, known as bursitis.

How do you get rid of retrocalcaneal bursitis?

There are different ways to get rid of retrocalcaneal bursitis. I’ll list down the common ways. However, consult your physician before using any of these methods…

  • Orthotics or Heel wedges – One of the main ways to relieve the bursitis pain is to elevate the heel. This can be achieved in three different ways…use an orthotic that will create a heel-to-toe drop, or use a heel wedge. You can also do that by using any shoe that has a heel-to-toe drop.
  • Physical Therapy focused on calf and Achilles – One way to remove the pain from bursitis is to improve the flexibility of the calf muscles and Achilles’s tendons. This way, it will alleviate the pressure from your heels and will help you to heal. You can include Achilles stretching and strengthening exercises in this routine. However, take a doctor’s or physiotherapist’s help for the same.
  • Corticosteroids – If the pain is unbearable then your doctor may inject a corticosteroid into the affected region. I don’t know what are those as I’m not a medical professional. Kindly contact your doctor if you wish to know more.
  • Surgery – In some extreme cases, you may have to go under the knife to get better.
  • Antibiotics – If your healthcare professional finds that your bursitis is due to some kind of bacteria infection, then they may prescribe you some antibiotics.

Is retrocalcaneal bursitis same as Achilles Tendonitis?

No retrocalcaneal bursitis is not the same as Achilles Tendonitis. Retrocalcaneal Bursitis is a condition related to the retrocalcaneal bursa, whereas Achilles tendonitis is related to Achilles Tendons.

Although sometimes the things that you need to do to relieve both of these pains are similar like using a heel wedge or a shoe with higher heel-to-toe drop.

The reason is, that both of them are connected and are like a chain. If one of them is affected, then the whole chain fails. Also, sometimes both of the conditions develop due to similar reasons like suddenly putting a lot of load on your feet or having inflexible calf and Achilles area.

However, heel bursitis may also occur due to bacterial infection which is not the case with Achilles Tendonitis.

Can running shoes really help with retrocalcaneal bursitis?

Running shoes can help with retrocalcaneal bursitis if they have a higher elevation. They will act in the same way as a heel wedge and will relieve some stress from the Achilles Tendons.

However, if you are planning to run with this foot condition wearing an elevated shoe, I’ll advise against that, as that may increase the pain that you have.

Does heel bursitis ever go away?

Yes, heel bursitis goes away within two to three weeks. However, if you have a more severe condition then it may take six to 12 months.

Most Loved Running Shoes For Retrocalcaneal Bursitis
Most Loved Running Shoes For Retrocalcaneal Bursitis


Madhusree Basu - Bestplaygear

Madhusree Basu (Author, Admin)

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.


Related Articles…

Salomon Vs Nike Sizing: How Different Are They?

Rowing Vs Running Vs Cycling: Which One Is Better For You?

Hoka Vs Nike: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Hoka Vs New Balance: Which Brand Is Right For You?

New Balance Size Chart Vs Nike

10 Best Running Shoes For Ingrown Toenails (Highly Rated)

Top 6 Best running shoes for Plantar Fasciitis

6 Best Women’s Running Shoes for Sesamoiditis

Salomon Vs Nike Sizing: How Different Are They?

Salomon Vs Nike Sizing: How Different Are They?

Salomon and Nike are two very popular brands of running shoes.

Actually, to say that they only produce running shoes is a bit of an understatement. Both of them produce a lot of other products with Salomon having a fair share of other outdoor equipment.

We will cover that in a future post when we compare the brands as a whole. However, since this post is related to the sizing of Salomon vs Nike, we will focus on that. More specifically on the running footwear that they produce.

There are a lot of similarities between these two brands related to running shoe sizing, but there are a whole lot of differences as well.

Also, before proceeding further, I would like to tell you that, I’ll not be comparing the heel-to-toe drop of Salomon and Nike with each other as I’ve already covered that in this article.

Let’s proceed…

Related: Do Hokas Run Big, Small, Or True To Size?

Asics Gel Kayano Vs Nike Pegasus: Which One Is The Best For You?

Salomon Vs Nike Sizing

Salmon Vs Nike Sizing: Differences

1. For Nike women’s size starts from 21cm(8.27 in)/4(US)/1.5(UK)/34.5(EU). For Nike women’s size starts from 22cm (8.66 in)/5(US)/3.5(UK)/36(EU).

2. For Salomon men’s size starts from 22cm (8.5 in)/4(US)/3.5(UK)/36(EU). For Nike men’s size starts from 22.5cm (8.86 in)/3.5(US)/3(UK)/35.5(EU).

3. Some of the sizes of Salomon for EU region are represented with fractions like 1/3, 2/3 etc. whereas for Nike it is represented in an increment of 0.5 for the EU region.

4. For some of the sizes from Nike there is a double number representation like 4.5/5 for all the regions. Such a thing is not present in Salomon.

5. For women’s shoes Nike has more sizes than Salomon for smaller pairs and larger pairs as well.

6. For men’s shoes, Salomon has one more smaller size than Nike. However, for the larger pairs, there are many more sizes available in Nike than Salomon.

7. The numbers representing the same lengths of the shoes are completely different for both the brands and you will not be able to relate to it directly.

Related: 10 Best 5mm Drop Running Shoes

Salomon Vs Nike Sizing: Women’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Salomon (US)

Nike (US)

Salomon (UK)

Nike (UK)

Salomon (EU)

Nike (EU)

21 cm

(8.27 in)

-

4

-

1.5

-

34.5

21.5 cm

(8.46 in)

-

4.5

-

2

-

35

22 cm

(8.66 in)

5

5

3.5

2.5

36

35.5

22.5 cm

(8.85 in)

5.5

5.5

4

3

36 2/3

36

23 cm

(9.05 in)

6

6

4.5

3.5

37 1/3

36.5

23.5 cm

(9.25 in)

6.5

6.7

5

4

38

37.5

24 cm

(9.45 in)

7

7

5.5

4.5

38 2/3

38

24.5 cm

(9.65 in)

7.5

7.5

6

5

39 1/3

38.5

25 cm

(9.85 in)

8

8

6.5

5.5

40

39

25.5 cm

(10.03 in)

8.5

8.5

7

6

40 2/3

40

26 cm

(10.24 in)

9

9

7.5

6.5

41 1/3

40.5

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

9.5

9.5

8

7

42

41

27 cm

(10.63 in)

10

10

8.5

7.5

42 2/3

42

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

10.5

10.5

9

8

43 1/3

42.5

28 cm

(11.03 in)

11

11

9.5

8.5

44

43

28.5 cm

(11.23 in)

11.5

11.5

10

9

44 2/3

44

29 cm

(11.03 in)

12

12

10.5

9.5

45 1/3

44.5

29.5 cm

(11.23 in)

12.5

12.5

11

10

46

45

30 cm

(12.03 in)

13

13

11.5

10.5

46 2/3

45.5

30.5 cm

(12.23 in)

13.5

13.5

12

11

47 1/3

46

31 cm

(12.43 in)

14

14

12.5

11.5

48

47

31.5 cm

(12.63 in)

14.5

14.5

13

12

48 2/3

47.5

32 cm

(12.83 in)

15

15

13.5

12.5

49 1/3

48

32.5 cm

(13.03 in)

15.5

15.5

14

13

50

48.5

33 cm

(13.23 in)

16

16

14.5

13.5

50 2/3

49

33.5 cm

(13.43 in)

-

16.5

-

14

-

50

34 cm

(13.63 in)

-

17

-

14.5

-

50.5

34.5 cm

(13.83 in)

-

17.5

-

15

-

51

35 cm

(14.03 in)

-

18

-

15.5

-

51.5

35.5 cm

(14.23 in)

-

18.5

-

16

-

52

36 cm

(14.43 in)

-

19

-

16.5

-

52.5

36.5 cm

(14.63 in)

-

19.5

-

17

-

53

37 cm

(14.83 in)

-

20

-

17.5

-

53.5

37.5 cm

(15.03 in)

-

20.5

-

18

-

54

38 cm

(15.23 in)

-

21

-

18.5

-

54.5

38.5 cm

(15.43 in)

-

21.5

-

19

-

55

39 cm

(15.63 in)

-

22

-

19.5

-

55.5

39.5 cm

(15.83 in)

-

22.5

-

20

-

56

Download Salomon Vs Nike Size Chart For Women

Related: Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

Nike Vs Salomon Sizing: Men’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Salomon (US)

Nike (US)

Salomon (UK)

Nike (UK)

Salomon (EU)

Nike (EU)

22cm

(8.5 in)

4

-

3.5

-

36

-

22.5cm

(8.86 in)

4.5

3.5

4

3

36 2/3

35.5

23cm

(9.05 in)

5

4

4.5

3.5

37 1/3

36

23.5cm

(9.25 in)

5.5

4.5/5

5

4/4.5

38

36.5/37.5

24cm

(9.45 in)

6

5/5.5

5.5

5.5/6

38.5

38/38.5

24.5cm

(9.64 in)

6.5

6.5

6

6

38 2/3

39

25 cm

(9.84 in)

7

7

6.5

6

39 1/3

40

25.5 cm

(10.04 in)

7.5

7.5

7

6.5

40

40.5

26 cm

(10.24 in)

8

8

7.5

7

40 2/3

41

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

8.5

8

8

7.5

41 1/3

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

9

8.5

8

42

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

9.5

9.5

9

8.5

42 2/3

43

28 cm

(11.02 in)

10

10

9.5

9

43 1/3

44

28.5 cm

(11.22 in)

10.5

10.5

10

9.5

44

44.5

29 cm

(11.42 in)

11

11

10.5

10

44 2/3

45

29.5 cm

(11.61 in)

11.5

11.5

11

10.5

45 1/3

45.5

30 cm

(11.81 in)

12

12

11.5

11

46

46

30.5 cm

(12 in)

12.5

12.5

12

11.5

46 2/3

47

31 cm

(12.20 in)

13

13

12.5

12

47 1/3

47.5

31.5 cm

(12.40 in)

13.5

13.5

13

12.5

48

48

32 cm

(12.60 in)

14

14

13.5

13

48 2/3

48.5

32.5 cm

(12.80 in)

14.5

14.5

14

13.5

49 1/3

49

33 cm

(13.0 in)

15

15

14.5

14

50

49.5

33.5 cm

(13.2 in)

-

15.5

-

14.5

50 2/3

50

34 cm

(13.38 in)

-

16

-

15

-

50.5

34.5 cm

(13.58 in)

-

16.5

-

15.5

-

51

35 cm

(13.78 in)

-

17

-

16

-

51.5

35.5 cm

(13.98 in)

-

17.5

-

16.5

-

52

36 cm

(14.17 in)

-

18

-

17

-

52.5

36.5 cm

(14.37 in)

-

18.5

-

17.5

-

53

37 cm

(14.57 in)

-

19

-

18

-

53.5

37.5 cm

(14.76 in)

-

19.5

-

18.5

-

54

38 cm

(14.96 in)

-

20

-

19

-

54.5

38.5 cm

(15.16 in)

-

20.5

-

19.5

-

55

39 cm

(15.35 in)

-

21

-

20

-

55.5

39.5 cm

(15.55 in)

-

21.5

-

20.5

-

56

40 cm

(15.75 in)

-

22

-

21

-

56.5

Download Nike size compared to Salomon (Men)

Related: New Balance Size Chart Vs Nike

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

Related: Top 15 Best Running Shoes for Morton’s Neuroma Reviewed

Do Nike Run Bigger Or Smaller Than Salomon?

No Nike doesn’t run bigger or smaller than Salomon. The lengths in cm or inches that are present in Salomon are also present in Nike barring a few which lengths are not available in either of the brands.

However, if you try to equate the lengths based on the different numbers other that are used for shoe size representation, then you will have a hard time.

Of all the size comparisons that I’ve done, I’ve not seen so much of number variations between the two brands.

Only a handful of the numbers match with each other for both the brands and the rest are all different.

Also, you cannot apply generalized rules for those numbers as well…They vary so much that I cannot even tell that, from this number to this number Salomon is leading or Nike is leading…or something similar…

So, as always, I’ll tell you to check the shoe length in a more universal unit like cm or inches that way you will be able to avoid this numbering confusion.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Hoka Vs Nike: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Hoka Vs Nike: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Hoka Vs Nike is tough to compare as a brand. Both produce two very different kinds of shoes and both are very popular brands.

We found it very hard to compare Nike and Hoka…but nonetheless we tried to do justice with this comparison.

Below we have compared them in as much detail as possible so that you can choose the right brand for you…let’s find out, which one we prefer…Nike or Hoka…

Hoka Vs Nike

Hoka Vs Nike: Differences

1. The maximum drop of a Hoka shoe is 6mm whereas the maximum drop of a Nike shoe is 10mm.

2. Nike produces more types of sports shoes, however, Hoka also has orthopedic shoes and recovery sandals which Nike doesn’t have.

3. Nike manufactures from caps to sweatshirts to modest wear, whereas Hoka only has shorts, tops, and leggings.

4. Nike has 3 trail-running models and around 48 road running models of shoes, whereas Hoka has 12 trail-running models and 20 road-running models of shoes.

5. Between Hoka and Nike, surprisingly Nike has the most maximally cushioned shoes.

6. Nike has a toe spring and flex grooves in the forefoot for easier heel-to-toe movement, whereas Hoka uses rocker technology.

7. In general, Hoka cushioning feels slightly softer than Nike midsoles.

8. Nike has more models of running shoes than Hoka combining both road running and trail running shoes.

9. Nike looks edgier than Hoka, who has a more bulky appearance.

10. Nike has a pointed toe box, whereas Hoka generally has a more roundish toe box.

Related: ON Running Vs Nike Sizing: Differences And Similarities

Hoka and Nike: Similarities

  • The minimum drop of both Hoka and Nike is 4mm.
  • Both Nike and Hoka are shifting towards eco-friendly and sustainable materials.
  • Both manufacture sports apparel.
  • Both have running shoes in the maximal cushioning category.
  • Both manufacture running shoes for trails and roads.
  • Both the brands have a non-restrictive fit.
  • Both use engineered mesh in the upper of their running shoes.
  • Both use a foam material that is a derivative of EVA foam.
  • Both have some models which have a carbon fiber plate.
  • Both are available in India.

Related: Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

Shoe Construction

Hoka and Nike is both very popular brands for running shoes. However, Hoka is a comparatively newer entry into the running shoe horizon.

Hoka was founded in 2009 whereas Nike has been around since 1964.

However, that doesn’t change the way these shoes feel on your feet. Hoka throughout the years has done a lot of innovations and is currently dominating the lower drop segment in the market.

Nike on the other hand needs no introduction even outside the US. This may be one of the most loved brands throughout the world.

And as per construction, both of them make world-class running shoes that are great for excellent performance and cushioning.

Both the brands support multiple types of runners and multiple types of runs. Now let’s see how each of their components measures up to each other.

Related: Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Midsole

The midsole of the running shoe is the main source of comfort and performance for a runner. Hoka and Nike both have gone above and beyond with innovation to provide you with the right cushioning for just your need…

Hoka heavily uses CMEVA or Compression-Molded EVA foam. It is created from EVA foam and retains it comfort and cushioning.

Nike has different types of midsoles that are used in different models. One of the primary cushioning materials from Nike is the Air Zoom material. You can think of them as pockets filled with air in between stretched materials.

When you apply pressure on that unit, it compresses, and with the release of pressure, it bounces back to the original shape. This provides you with exceptional cushioning and shock absorption.

In general, these units are present throughout the length of the sole or in the heel region for that added shock absorption.

Also, most of the running shoes from Hoka use meta rocker technology which has two distinct categories…the early-stage meta rocker and the late-stage meta rocker.

The position of the transition zone decided the type of meta rocker that is used. If it is behind the metatarsals, then it is an early-stage meta rocker. If the transition zone is in front of the metatarsals, it is the late-stage meta-rocker. The late stage provides a more stable midfoot.

You will be able to find this rocker technology in Nike as well. This is most common in shoes that have ZoomX cushioning. As with Hoka, this technology from Nike also has a similar function. It helps in easier heel-to-transition.

ZoomX is one of the most, if not the lightest, softest, and most responsive midsole materials from Nike. Apart from being one of the cushiest materials from Nike, ZoomX also has a unidirectional carbon fiber plate.

This enhances the responsiveness of the sole and provides you with better performance.

Apart from ZoomX, Nike also has React foam. As you might be aware, this foam debuted in 2017 for basketball shoes and within a year, Nike adapted it for its running shoes.

This is a cushioning which is a blend of soft cushiness and excellent energy return, which is often mutually exclusive. React cushioning has significant energy return and provides you excellent cushioning while simultaneously being lightweight.

Also, this foam is very durable and will not lose shape easily.

Another type of cushioning that you will frequently see in the lower-priced shoes from Nike is the Cushlon foam. This is a soft foam that is good with cushioning and responsiveness. It feels soft under the foot and is good for everyday runs.

I would not recommend Cushlon for longer distances, but for shorter distances and training, they are excellent cushioning material.

For stability Hoka uses J-Frame. This helps runners with overpronation. It is basically a firmer foam on the medial side in the shape of a J.

Nike uses a supportive medial post for stability. This is a dual-density foam handle overpronation and helps runners who need more support.

For Hoka, there is another H-Frame technology that comes into play in some shoes like Gaviota. The midfoot H-Frame provides you with increased upper support and also locks down the midfoot.

I would vote that comfort-wise, Hoka and Nike are almost at par. However, I’ve always found Nike to be a bit stiffer than my liking. Being said that, cushions, Nike does a fabulous job and so does Hoka.

So, to decide between the two, the only choice you have is to try them on. Choose the one wearing which you feel more comfortable. It need not have to be super-soft if that is not your preference. Choose something that you like and will serve your purpose.

Also, this may be the appropriate place to mention that, Hoka dominates the low heel drop segment. The highest drop that is available from Hoka is 6mm, so, decide accordingly.

If you need a running shoe with a higher drop, then look into the models from Nike as the drop here goes up to 10mm.

Outsole

The outsole of Hoka is mostly made of durable rubber. This type of rubber is highly abrasion resistant and will last for a long time.

Also, the grip on both wet and dry surfaces of these outsoles is also good. You have fewer chances of tripping, slipping, or falling.

However, if you are thinking of a full-blown outsole covering the entire outer surface of the midsole, then you are mistaken.

Hoka uses, what can be dest described as rubber stips on the high wear and tear prone areas. This reinforces those areas and improves durability.

With Hoka, you will find another variation in the outsole and it is the rubberized EVA. In this type, what Hoka does is make the outer surface of the midsole rubberized.

This way they saved up on the rubber strips of durable rubber and simultaneously lighten the overall weight of the shoe.

However, I felt that the durably of such shoes are slightly less than that of the rubber sole shoes. Hoka also uses this similar method for the exposed areas of the midsole in-between rubber-covered areas.

With Nike, the usage of durable rubber on the outsole is more. However, you can still find rubberized foam in the less-premium models from Nike.

The outsole design of Nike is generated through a computer and provides you with a precise groove and flex pattern. The input of this design is based on the inputs from thousand of athletes and this provides you with a running outsole that is durable, grippy, and provides slightly added cushioning.

There are various patterns that you will be able to find on the outsole of the shoes from Nike and one of them is the waffle pattern that is present at the forefoot of Nike models like Pegasus.

On landing, they distribute the load and also grip the ground firmly. This way it acts as a cushioning material as well.

Although the rubber is distributed throughout the outsole, it is not a continuous piece of rubber. This ensures that the running shoe has optimal flexibility and doesn’t add additional stiffness to the sole. This is because the inherent nature of durable rubber is stiffness.

The other thing that Nike uses to improve the flexibility of the shoe is the addition of flex grooves on the forefoot. This is not present in all the models from Nike, but some of the popular models like Flex Experience Run have this feature. Also, this is a method that Nike uses and you will not find it in Hoka.

The main reason to have that is to help in easier heel-to-toe transition which is handled by Hoka using its meta rocker technology.

This is an alternate technology that Nike uses to improve the heel-to-toe transition. Also, the shoes from Nike that uses rocker technology don’t have these flex grooves for obvious reasons.

This is what is used in the outsole of road running shoes. For trail runners, both companies use aggressive lugs that may be unidirectional or multidirectional.

Nike shoes have tapering lugs that easily get embedded in the trails, providing you with a lot more stability while running on them.

Is there any difference when you run in either of these shoes?

Grip-wise you won’t be able to tell much. They grip the roads or the trails pretty well and are excellent to provide durability to these shoes.

Upper

Hoka and Nike both uses engineered mesh on the upper for durability, support, and to keep the runner’s feet secured.

In Hoka, there are mainly two types of meshed…one is the engineered mesh and the other is engineered jacquard mesh.

In Jacquard mesh, complex designs are directly knitted in the mesh whereas, in engineered mesh, such a thing is not there…

For example, the upper of Mach Supersonic is jacquard mesh whereas Bondi is open engineered mesh.

With both types of meshes, you will not have issues with breathability…however, a jacquard mesh appears to be thicker and denser.

Hoka has started transitioning to a more sustainable way of production and is using a lot of recycled materials in its shoes.

A similar thing can be observed in Nike as well and one such initiative is to replace their double-layered cardboard boxes with single-layer boxes and to make that box with 90% recycled materials.

Most of the upper of Hoka shoes have TPU overlays…these overlays are used to reinforce the midfoot structure of the shoes.

The tongue in the models of Hoka is made from engineered mesh and has nice padding. They are anatomically designed and are great with breathability.

Also, the tongue may be gusseted/integrated or non-gusseted/free…Since the design of the tongues is anatomical, they will rarely move even if they are free.

Hoka is also transitioning to include that extended pull tab in its models.  Some of the models like Bondi or Arahi still have the traditional lace pull tab at the back of the heel.

However, the likes of Clifton or Mach have already included that in the upper and now provide additional support to the Achilles area plus. This has also made it easy to put on these shoes.

The heel counter of Hoka shoes are well constructed and locks your heel in. This doesn’t allow your heels to move around for any unforeseen accidents and/or create blisters.

These Hoka Shoes have a sockliner which is from OrthoLite and most of them are removable. These are molded EVA sockliner and provide you with comfort and proper arch support.

Nike uses a couple of technologies when it comes to the upper, however, it boils down to a primary type of mesh which is the engineered mesh.

Unlike Hoka, Nike has not yet adopted jacquard mesh and it doesn’t seem that they will adopt that in the future.

However, with engineered mesh they use two primary kinds…one is the Fresh knit that you will find in shoes like Flex Experience Run and Flyknit that you will find in shoes like Pegasus.

Flyknit is a more premium upper which is manufactured from strong yet lightweight yarn. It is woven into a single-piece upper to avoid unnecessary stitching.

With Flyknit another thing that comes into the picture is the Flywire cables. They are present in the lace area and provide additional midfoot stability. They also secure the midfoot.

Many of the models of Nike have adopted that extended pull tab feature which is excellent for easily wearing this shoe.

Also, the tongue that is present in most of the models has a padded tongue. This is a key thing for comfort as it will keep you comfortable while running.

The tongue of Nike models may be gusseted or non-gusseted depending on the models and will provide you with excellent comfort.

The laces of all the models of Nike now have a flat lace. This helps to keep them remain tied while running. Although this should have been the case ideally, for some of the models (I personally own a Nike Air Zoom Structure), they tend to come untied while running.

Related: 10 Best Walking Shoes For Blister Prone Feet (Highly Rated)

Other Considerations

Hoka and Nike both produce running shoes that are very well made. Both the brands produce running shoes whose most models are true to size. However, if you try to draw parallels to the sizing, then you may have a bit of difficulty as the way they represent sizing is a bit different.

But you can still co-relate that using the length of the shoes either represented in cm or inches.

As we know, Hoka only produces running shoes that are low drop. However, Nike covers a wider range of drops and some of them belong to the category of high heel drops.

Related: 10 Best Running Shoes With High Heel Drop (12mm-15mm)

Durability

Hoka shoes may last you around 350 miles. Although, how long they will last will depend on how careful you are with the shoes and how you are using them.

With any highly cushioned running shoe, this is common and this doesn’t come as a surprise. Anything which lasts for 300-500 miles is considered good durability and Hoka is right in the ballpark of that.

Nike on the other hand lasts a bit lesser and according to Nike quality engineers, an average Nike shoe lasts for 200-300 miles. Of course, that changes from shoe to shoe and the usage, but that is how it is…

This is a bit surprising as I expected that due to the maximal nature of Hoka, they may last lesser than Nike. However, other than this, these shoes are considered at par.

Related: Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

Cushioning

The main cushioning material of Hoka is CMEVA. This is a cushy material and will provide you with exceptional impact resistance and is great for running longer distances.

They have included different technologies together to provide you with an excellent running experience.

The main material for cushioning in Nike running shoes is Zoom or Air Zoom. In some cases, they use Cushlon foam also. All these materials are a derivative of EVA foam and are combined with some specific technologies to make it even more comfortable.

Comfort-wise, I’ll consider both of these brands at par.

Related: Asics Gel Kayano Vs Nike Pegasus: Which One Is The Best For You?

Hoka Bondi Vs Clifton – Which Hoka Is Best For Your Feet?

Overall Fit And Comfort

The overall fit of Hoka is a bit widish. It will not be comfortable for most of the runners. However, one big limitation with Hoka is that, apart from the most popular models, the rest of them are not available in wide fit.

A similar thing exists with Nike as well. Apart from a couple of models, Nike is not available in wide fit.

This is bit of a problem for the runners who need a wider fit. Also, it may be only my perception, but I find Nike’s fit a bit snugger than a Hoka…but it is there…

Pricing

The starting price of Nike road running shoes is around $40 and in the range between $40 to $100, you get many models. You will also get the Nike Juniper Trail which is a trail running shoe.

However, with Hoka, the starting price of their road running range is around $130. You will not find a road running shoe in the $50-$100 range.

So, if you want to switch to Hoka from Nike, then depending on the model of Nike that you use, the price jump can be rather stiff.

However, if you are using something that is a more premium model from Nike, then the price point may match that of Hoka.

Actually, there are some models of Nike that costs way more than the most premium shoe from Hoka like Nike Zoom Alphafly Next Nature.

So, price-wise, Nike as a brand provides a much wider range than Hoka and for that matter has a lot more models than Hoka as well.

Conclusion

If you compare Nike Vs Hoka, both the brands are very similar in a lot of ways.

If one scores one point in some aspect, the other takes leads in some other category. Also, while comparing, I came to realize that some of the shortcomings that Hoka has are also present in Nike and vice versa.

Overall, both are excellent running shoe brands and will serve you well. However, which one will suit you will be completely dependent on your preference.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

When you compare Saucony vs ASICS sizing, it becomes very interesting.

TBH, I also did not know what exactly are the differences, before I did the research for this article.

When you compare data side by side, the kind of details that pop up is just fascinating…

Did you know ASICS has some odd measurements for some of the sizes and those size numbers actually tally up with Saucony, whose length is again different from ASICS?

Did I confuse you? Well, don’t worry I’ll present the differences between ASICS and Saucony sizing as clearly as possible.

BTW, I did not compare the heel-to-toe drop of Saucony and Asics with each other as I’ve already covered that in this article.

Let’s procced…

Related: Do Hokas Run Big, Small, Or True To Size?

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing

Saucony Vs ASICS Sizing: Differences

1. For some lengths ASICS lengths increase by 0.25cm and not by cm0.5 like 25.25cm, 28.25cm for men, and 22.75cm, 25cm.75 for women. Such an increase is not present in Saucony.

2. For Saucony women’s size starts from 21.5cm(8.46 in)/5(US)/3(UK)/35.5(EU). For ASICS women’s size starts from 22.75cm (8.96 in)/5.5(US)/3.5(UK)/36(EU).

3. For Saucony men’s size starts from 22.5cm (8.86 in)/4.5(US)/3.5(UK)/37(EU). For ASICS men’s size starts from 22.5cm (8.86 in)/4(US)/3(UK)36(EU).

4. Most of the men’s sizes of Saucony are equivalent to an ASICS number by 0.5 steps. It is the same for women’s except for the bigger sizes.

5. For women’s shoes ASICS has the sizes 5.5(US)/3.5(UK)/36(EU) corresponding to the length of 22.75cm(8.96 in). Such a size is not present in Saucony.

6. For women’s shoes ASICS has the size 9(US)/7(UK)/40.5(EU) corresponding to the length of 25.75cm(10.13 in). Although the same numbers are present in Saucony it represents the length of 25.5cm (10.03 in).

7. For men’s shoes, ASICS has the size 7(US)/6(UK)/40(EU) corresponding to the length of 25.25cm(10.13 in). Although the same numbers are present in Saucony it represents the length of 25cm (9.84 in).

8. For men’s shoes, ASICS has the size 10.5(US)/9.5(UK)/44.5(EU) corresponding to the length of 28.25cm(10.13 in). Although the same numbers are present in Saucony it represents the length of 28.5cm (11.22 in).

9. Saucony has more sizes of men’s shoes for the longer lengths than ASICS.

10. For women’s shoes ASICS has more sizes available than Saucony for longer lengths.

11. For women’s shoes Saucony has more sizes available than Asics for shorter lengths.

Related: Running Shoe Heel Drop Chart (Illustrated)

Saucony Vs ASICS Sizing: Women’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Saucony (US)

ASICS (US)

Saucony (UK)

ASICS (UK)

Saucony (EU)

ASICS (EU)

-

4

-

2

-

34.5

-

-

4.5

-

2.5

-

35

-

21.5 cm

(8.46 in)

5

-

3

-

35.5

-

22 cm

(8.66 in)

5.5

-

3.5

-

36

-

22.5 cm

(8.85 in)

6

-

4

-

37

-

22.75 cm

(8.96 in)

-

5.5

-

3.5

-

36

23 cm

(9.05 in)

6.5

6

4.5

4

37.5

37

23.5 cm

(9.25 in)

7

6.5

5

4.5

38

37.5

24 cm

(9.45 in)

7.5

7

5.5

5

38.5

38

24.5 cm

(9.65 in)

8

7.5

6

5.5

39

39

25 cm

(9.85 in)

8.5

8

6.5

6

40

39.5

25.5 cm

(10.03 in)

9

8.5

7

6.5

40.5

40

25.75 cm

(10.13 in)

-

9

-

7

-

40.5

26 cm

(10.24 in)

9.5

9.5

7.5

7.5

41

41.5

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

10

10

8

8

42

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

10.5

10.5

8.5

8.5

42.5

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

11

11

9

9

43

43.5

28 cm

(11.03 in)

-

11.5

-

9.5

-

44

28.5 cm

(11.23 in)

-

12

-

10

-

44.5

Download Saucony Vs Asics Size Chart For Women

Related: Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

ASICS Vs Saucony Sizing: Men’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Saucony (US)

ASICS (US)

Saucony (UK)

ASICS (UK)

Saucony (EU)

ASICS (EU)

-

3

-

2

-

35

-

-

3.5

-

2.5

-

35.5

-

-

4

-

3

-

36

-

22.5cm

(8.86 in)

4.5

4

3.5

3

37

36

23cm

(9.05 in)

5

4.5

4

3.5

37.5

37

23.5cm

(9.25 in)

5.5

5

4.5

4

38

37.5

24cm

(9.45 in)

6

5.5

5

4.5

38.5

38

24.5cm

(9.64 in)

6.5

6

5.5

5

39

39

25 cm

(9.84 in)

7

6.5

6

5.5

40

39.5

25.25 cm

(9.94 in)

-

7

-

6

-

40

25.5 cm

(10.04 in)

7.5

7.5

6.5

6.5

40.5

40.5

26 cm

(10.24 in)

8

8

7

7

41

41.5

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

8.5

8.5

7.5

7.5

42

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

9

9

8

8

42.5

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

9.5

9.5

8.5

8.5

43

43.5

28 cm

(11.02 in)

10

10

9

9

44

44

28.25 cm

(11.12 in)

-

10.5

-

9.5

-

44.5

28.5 cm

(11.22 in)

10.5

11

9.5

10

44.5

45

29 cm

(11.42 in)

11

11.5

10

10.5

45

46

29.5 cm

(11.61 in)

11.5

12

10.5

11

46

46.5

30 cm

(11.81 in)

12

-

11

-

46.5

-

30.5 cm

(12 in)

12.5

-

11.5

-

47

-

31 cm

(12.20 in)

13

-

12

-

48

-

-

14

-

13

-

49

-

-

15

-

14

-

50

-

-

16

-

15

-

51.5

-

Download ASICS size compared to Saucony (Men)

Related: New Balance Size Chart Vs Nike

Related: Top 15 Best Running Shoes for Morton’s Neuroma Reviewed

Do ASICS Run Bigger Or Smaller Than Saucony?

No, ASICS doesn’t run bigger or smaller than Saucony as for almost every length of Saucony there is an ASICS running shoe present, except for some of the higher and lower sizes.

However, this misconception arises because the numbers that the shoe represents in both brands are different.

For example, let’s pick the size 6.5(US) of Saucony for the women’s shoes which are 23 cm in length. The same length is represented by ASICS with the number 6(US).

Let’s check another example…

For the length of 26.5 cm of women’s shoes both ASICS and Saucony represent it with the number 10(US).

You can find many such examples where for the same length the number that ASICS uses is bigger than that of Saucony.

So, basically every number that a shoe represents in any of these brands may represent the same or a different length and neither of them runs smaller or bigger than the other.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

10 Best 5mm Drop Running Shoes [2022]

10 Best 5mm Drop Running Shoes [2022]

[aff_disclosure]

There are a lot of running shoes available on the market that has a medium heel-to-toe drop. Most running shoe companies manufacture them. If you try to find 5mm heel drop running shoes, it becomes a bit tedious.

This category is dominated by Hoka One One and you will get a variety of shoes that has a 5mm drop.

If you are short on time and don’t want to spend it reading this whole article, you can blindly go with Hoka Clifton 8.

This is one of the shoes that are at the top of the list and in my mind.

Most of the popular shoe companies like Brooks, New Balance, Nike, Mizuno, and Salomon don’t manufacture a running shoe that has a 5mm drop.

Asics and Adidas do manufacture them, but with the overwhelming number of models that they have, it is tedious to find such a shoe.

Now being said, we know that you don’t have that kind of time to go through the overwhelming choices that are there.

So, we have come up with a list of the 10 best 5mm drop running shoes that will narrow down the search for you.

We have included shoes for every type of runner like overpronation, underpronation, neutral, road, and trail runners. Hopefully, you will find your match.

Best 5mm drop running shoes

Best 5mm Heel Drop Running Shoes (Detailed Review)

HOKA CLIFTON

The first running shoe that we have in the 5mm heel drop category is Hoka Clifton 8. If you are not living under the rock, then you must have heard about Clifton.

Also, if you are a long-term runner, you may also have used one. Nonetheless, Clifton is one of the best running shoes in the market and tops our 5mm heel drop chart.

Clifton comes from the house of Hoka and is a very well-cushioned running shoe. It has excellent forefoot and rearfoot cushioning which comes from CMEVA or compression-molded EVA.

The heel stack of Hoka Clifton is 37mm and the forefoot is 32mm which is equal to 37mm-32mm=5mm heel-to-toe drop.

Although having a lowish drop, Clifton has a huge amount of cushioning which is evident from its high heel and forefoot stack.

Apart from excellent cushioning, Clifton is a good-looking and stylish shoe. With the incorporation of the extended pull tab and a contrasting color of the collar, its appeal has increased further.

The running platform is also very stable and it will do an excellent job at shock absorption in landing on forefoot or midfoot.

It comes with a beveled heel, however, that is not used in the calculation of the heel-to-toe drop of Clifton. This would have reduced the drop further.

This is not used because, to measure the height of the heel and the forefoot, you will have to place the shoe on a flat surface and measure the heel height and the forefoot height from that surface.

Pros

  • Good fit and style.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Available in two widths, regular and wide.
  • Excellent for foot issues like metatarsalgia and bunions.

Cons

  • Not good for long toes.
HOKA ONE ONE MACH 4

Hoka Mach is an everyday running shoe and comes with responsive PROFLY cushioning. It is shock-absorbing and snappy and is excellent for racing.

This is a very lightweight shoe with a weight of around 7.2oz. Hoka Mach 4 also has a very close cousin called Hoka Mach Supersonic. It has very similar features to that of Hoka Mach.

The only difference that I found is the slight difference in weight and the additional pull tab ribbon that is not present in Hoka Mach.

From the cushioning level perspective, both are equivalent, and here is why…

The kind of cushioning that they use is the same PROFLY and the heel-to-toe drop and both stack heights are the same.

I’m digressing…let’s get back to Hoka Mach 4.

Hoka Mach 4 has a heel stack of 35mm and the forefoot stack of 30mm. So the heel-to-toe offset of Hoka Mach is 5mm, which is the same as Clifton as mentioned above.

However, the level of cushioning of Hoka Mach is slightly less than Hoka Clifton which is evident from the stack height and the kind of cushioning materials used in both types of shoes.

The PROFLY material is slightly stiffer and more responsive and is great for day-to-day running and races.

This kind of drop makes it an ideal choice for runners who run on forefoot or midfoot.

Stylewise Hoka Mach looks great and is very stylish. The anatomical Achilles construction provides you with excellent Achilles support and is great for preventing blisters.

Pros

  • Good for everyday running, and races.
  • Very responsive.
  • Stylish.
  • Early-stage meta-rocker.
  • Good for sesamoiditis.

Cons

  • Not available in a wider fit.

Related: Hoka Mach Vs Arahi: Which Hoka Should You Choose?

Hoka Mach Vs Bondi: Which Hoka One One Should Your Choose?

HOKA RINCON

Like the previous two, Hoka Rincon is also a neutral running shoe. It comes with a balanced cushioning as per Hoka.

However, when I tried it on, it feels more like plush cushioning, and you won’t be feeling the unevenness of the roads.

Being a balanced cushioned shoe, it provides you with good responsiveness. Hoka Rincon is good for running longer distances and will keep you comfortable.

Unlike Hoka Mach, Rincon has high abrasive rubber pasted on the high wear and tear areas. This ensures that Rincon has an excellent grip on the roads and will last you for a long time.

Now coming back to the drop of this shoe, Hoka Rincon like all the previous Hoka running shoes on this list, has a drop of 5mm.

Hoka Rincon has a heel stack of 33mm and a forefoot stack of 28mm, the difference of which comes as 5mm.

Although Rincon and Clifton belong to the same category of shoes with neutral pronation and balanced cushioning, the cushioning level of Clifton is slightly higher than that of Rincon.

This is very evident from the stack height difference between these two shoes, however, when you wear these shoes, you will be very comfortable.

Also, having a slightly lesser stack height makes Rincon a bit more responsive which is not there in Clifton and you will feel the slight dampening of the energy return when you wear Clifton.

So, although both the shoes have the same drop with respect to heel-to-toe, the experience that you will get out of these two shoes is very different.

Pros

  • Responsive.
  • Good for a marathon.
  • Prevents blisters.
  • Well-cushioned.
  • Stylish but traditional.

Cons

  • The tongue feels thin.
  • The fitting is a bit snug.

Related: Why Do Hokas Hurt Your Feet? (All models explained)

ASICS MAGIC SPEED

This is the first ASICS running shoe on our list that has a 5mm drop. As mentioned earlier, ASICS is one of the few companies that manufacture a 5mm drop shoe.

With Hoka the predominant drop is 5mm, however, with ASICS, you will get a wide range of drops starting from a low drop, followed by mid-drop and even the high drop running shoes.

 However, each of these categories has excellent running shoes and will provide you with a great running experience.

ASICS Magic Speed is no different. It is a comfortable running shoe that is great for long-distance running as well.

This is one of the few shoes that are under $100 and has a carbon fiber plate in them. With a mix of FLYTEFOAM, Carbon Fiber Plate, and GUIDESOLE, this is one of the most efficient shoes around.

However, since this is on this list, it also has a drop of 5mm.

Why?

The heel stack of ASICS Magic Speed is 34mm and the forefoot stack is 29mm. The difference between the two is 5mm. In other words, the heel-to-toe offset of ASICS Magic Speed is 5mm.

This is a very efficient running shoe, however, looks-wise it is not at all traditional. It is very stylish to look at and will definitely make you stand out in a crowd.

Also, this is a very lightweight shoe that is great for longer distances where every extra gram matters.

Pros

  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish.
  • Cushy.
  • Pocket friendly with carbon fiber plate.

Cons

  • Sizing seems to be an issue.
  • Loosening of laces will be required to slip it on.
ASICS GLIDERIDE 2

ASICS GlideRide 2 is the second and last Asics running shoe on this list. It is a max cushioned running shoe and is excellent for long-distance running.

 The side profile of Asics GlideRide looks very similar to that of Asics Magic Speed, however, the technologies that it uses are completely different.

One thing of GlideRide is very similar to Hoka other than the drop is that it also uses a rocker midsole.

This makes your running feel more effortless and you can run longer with less tiredness.

The primary midsole material of this shoe is the FlyteFoam. However, to make this shoe more bouncy it comes with an additional layer of FlyteFoam Propel. This makes the shoe feel more energetic and is very responsive.

Despite being max-cushioned the drop of this shoe is 5mm. The heel stack of Asics GlideRide 2 is 40mm and the forefoot stack is 35mm.

This is the most cushioned running shoe in this 5mm heel drop running shoes list. This is a fact shoe and has a different appeal than the rest of the running shoes on this list.

Although max cushioned, it doesn’t look as bulky as a Hoka shoe. On the contrary, it looks sleek and stylish and has a strikingly different design.

It comes with a comfortable in-shoe experience with a well-padded collar. The tongue is definitely more padded than Asics Magic Speed and will keep you comfortable.

Like most running shoes, Asics GlideRide also has adopted a flat lace design. It is made from polyester and will remain tied throughout your running session.

It is one of the most comfortable shoes in the 5mm heel drop category.

Pros

  • Shock absorbing.
  • Great for uptempo runs.
  • Stylish.
  • Maximal cushioning.

Cons

  • Not good for anything else other than running.
Hoka Challenger ATR

Hoka Challenger ATR 6 is a trail running shoe that can be used on the roads as well. It is good for any kind of trail and for roads that are not too smooth.

It is well cushioned and is great at shock absorption. The cushioning level of the Hoka Challenger ATR is high. It is slightly higher than Clifton which has balanced cushioning.

The midsole of the Hoka Challenger ATR is made from CMEVA or compression-molded EVA which is the same material as Clifton.

Also, the overall cushioning height of both the forefoot and the heels is the same as the Clifton.

Hoka Challenger ATR has a heel-to-toe drop of 5mm. The forefoot stack measures 32mm whereas the heel stack measures 37mm providing an effective drop of 5mm.

This is a shoe that is true to size with arch support of medium to high arches.

The upper has dual-layer mesh that is breathable and comfortable and is built with Unifi REPREVE recycled yarn.

It has a textured TPU toe cap that increases toe protection and saves you from unlikely injuries.

Since this is a trail running shoe, it has sizable lugs on its outsole. The individual lug length is around 4mm and provides reliable traction on the trails.

Like Clifton, Hoka Challenger also comes with an early-stage meta rocker. This helps you with an easier heel-to-toe transition and an overall lesser effort in running.

Pros

  • Very comfortable.
  • Decent-sized lugs for stability on terrains.
  • Can work on multiple surfaces.
  • Eco-friendly.
  • Gusseted tongue.

Cons

  • Lateral stability is less.

Related: Hoka Vs New Balance: Which Brand Is Right For You?

HOKA CARBON X3

This is the last Hoka running shoe on this list, I promise.

Hoka Carbon X 3 is a bit different than the rest of the Hokas that we have listed above. It is the one that has a carbon fiber plate and provides your feet with an additional pep.

To improve the peppiness of this running shoe along with using a carbon fiber plate, Hoka has combined PROFLY with CMEVA. PROFLY being more responsive adds another bit of snappiness to the cushioning.

Since this is in this list obviously the drop of this shoe is 5mm. Now, let’s check the stack height of these shoes…

The heel stack of Hoka Carbon X 3 is 37mm whereas the forefoot stack is around 32mm. This makes the overall heel drop as 5mm.

The level of cushioning of Carbon X 3 is similar to that of Clifton or Challenger ATR. However, the sole of Carbon X feels snappier than both of these shoes.

One of the reasons is, that the composition of the midsole is completely different than that of Clifton or Challenger.

Looks wise, Carbon X has the typical look of Hoka. It looks broad and big and comes with an integrated tongue.

This is great as the tongue will not move around and be uncomfortable. However, this makes one thing a bit problematic…you have to loosen the laces so that you can wear the shoes.

Also, the laces are flat and they remain tied throughout your running session. It comes with an extended pull-tab and this makes wearing this somewhat easier.

This also provides a bit of additional Achilles support and makes your running that much easier.

Pros

  • Cushy and shock absorbing.
  • Excellent responsiveness.
  • Good for multi-sport.

Cons

  • A bit snug.
  • Expensive.
ON CLOUDFLASH

ON Cloudflash looks more like a cycling shoe than a running shoe. But trust me, this is one of the best running shoes that you will ever run in.

However, ON Cloudflash is meant for shorter distances. If you run 10K or shorter distances, then it is one of the best running shoes out there. However, for longer distances, you may not be as comfortable in them.

This is refined over the years after taking feedback from the elite runners and what you have now is one of the fastest running shoes around.

It comes with two layers of Helion-powered CloudTec which means better cushioning and you will be able to feel the ground better.

Also, it has a carbon fiber-infused Speedboard that will deliver a more responsive ride.

The heel area is lower and has molded padding. This provides you with a more secure fit.

And of course, this has a drop of 5mm with a heel stack of 20mm and a forefoot stack of 15mm. This is the smallest stack height in the entire list of running shoes with 5mm drop or less.

Pros

  • Good for shorter distances.
  • Excellent shock absorption.
  • Lightweight.

Cons

  • Would have preferred a bit more tongue padding.
TOPO ATHLETIC ULTRAFLY 3

Topo Athletic is another brand other than Hoka that has a lot of running shoes that have 5mm drop.

Also, primarily a trail running brand, this is advantageous as there are hardly any 5mm shoes in other brands.

Although there are a lot of options to choose from, we have chosen two of them as including all the models that are available in this category is virtually impossible.

Feel free to do your research if you don’t the one that we have chosen…

The first model that we would like to show you is the Topo Athletic Ultrafly 3.

In this model, Ultrafly is introducing a new type of foam that is lighter and offers you more rebound than EVA. This foam is called Zipfoam.

Due to this foam, Ultrafly has become lighter and more responsive than the previous version…Also, technically this puts you in a position to run longer miles and enjoy more runs.

Ultrafly provides you with some stability with the use of medial posts. However, if you are a runner with severe overpronation, then this may not be the right shoe for you.

This running shoe is a bit heavier than some of the shoes on this list.

It has a rubber outsole, and is excellent with grip on the roads…yes, this is a road running shoe…

The drop of this running shoe is 5mm as expected. The heel stack is around 30mm and the forefoot stack is around 25mm. The difference between this two comes down to 5mm.

Pros

  • Good for road running and longer distances.
  • Moderate stability.
  • Good arch support.

Cons

  • Heavy.
TOPO ATHLETIC ULTRAVENTURE 2

This is the second 5mm drop running shoe that is great for the trails. As mentioned above, Topo Athletic is a brand that specializes in trail running shoes.

Also, this is one of the brands that have a large collection of 5mm drop shoes. We could not include all of them due to the space constraint, however, you can very well do your research here.

Now let’s focus on Topo Athletic ULTRAVENTURE 2.

This is a trail running shoe with a high level of cushioning. This is highly shock absorbing and is great for technical terrains.

This is a neutral running shoe that is formed with a 3-piece of EVA foam. This provides the midsole with just enough rigidity for a more snappy ride.

It comes with a TPU heel counter that provides you with more stability. It locks in the heels and doesn’t let it move around. With this heel counter, you will not face the problem of heel slip.

If you compare this version of ULTRAVENTURE with the previous model, you will find that the number of overlays has reduced. This improves the breathability of this running shoe and makes you more comfortable.

It comes with multi-directional lugs that provide you with excellent traction on a variety of surfaces.

Also, the Vibram XS Tek Outsole is great for better durability and traction.

And obviously, this is a 5mm drop running shoe. The heel stack of this shoe measures 34mm whereas the forefoot stack measures 29mm. So the effective drop of Topo Athletic ULTRAVENTURE is 5mm.

Pros

  • Great for technical trails.
  • Very cushy.
  • Multidirectional lugs for excellent traction.

Cons

  • Not good for runners with bunions.

FAQ

Is 5mm drop good?

Yes, 5mm is a good drop for a runner who lands on mid or forefoot. However, for a heel striker, a higher drop is preferable.

5mm drop stands on the borderline of low drop and medium drop with characteristics more like that of low drop shoe.

If you are a runner who runs on forefoot or midfoot, this is an ideal drop for you. Your feet have the optimal strength to handle the landing and your shoe also has to cushion in the right place.

However, if you are a heel striker, this may not be a good shoe for you.

Heel strikers are those runners who land on their heels. This causes your calf muscles to extend and stretch a lot more than that of a midfoot or forefoot striker. The same is true for your Achilles region as well.

For such a runner, it is preferable to have a higher heel drop as this will stop the overextending of your calf and Achilles area.

In such cases a drop of 8mm or higher is preferable.

What does 5mm drop mean?

The difference between the heel stack and the forefoot stack is 5mm. This is the meaning of 5mm drop.

For example:

Let’s say the heel stack or the heel height of a running shoe is 35mm and the forefoot stack or a forefoot height is 30mm, then the drop or the heel drop of the shoe is 5mm.

Again if the heel height is 20mm and the forefoot height is 15mm, the drop is 5mm.

If the heel height is 40mm and the forefoot height is 35mm, then also, the heel-to-toe offset is 5mm.

Basically, the heel-to-toe offset is independent of the stack height of the heel and forefoot and is merely a difference between the two values.

What is a normal running shoe drop?

Any drop is a normal running shoe drop and the choice will vary on the goal of the runner and the kind of the runner.

Currently, there are running shoes in the market whose drop ranges from 0-15mm, with 0-4mm being the low drop, 5-8mm being the medium drop, and 9-15mm being the high drop.

Each of the shoes is suited for a specific type of runner as mentioned previously.

Runners who have foot injuries or Achilles problem is better off with running shoes with greater than 8mm drop.

Whereas, if you want to strengthen your feet and want a more natural way of running, then go for running shoes with a 0-4mm drop.

A beginner may find a running shoe with a 5-8mm drop more suitable as they start getting accustomed to the way of running.

Related: Running Shoe Heel Drop Chart (Illustrated)

What does mm drop mean in shoes?

The meaning of mm drop in shoes is millimeter. Since the difference between the forefoot and heel stack is so small, it is expressed in millimeters.

In fact, other than the length of a running shoe, all the other values are generally expressed in mm and this is true for heel-to-toe drop as well.

Is 5mm drop running shoe a low drop running shoe?

Technically, a 5mm drop running shoe is a medium drop running shoe and not a low drop running shoe. Practically it is neither a medium drop running shoe nor a low drop running shoe as it is at the border of the two.

As mentioned above, 5mm drop actually belongs to the medium drop category. However, feel-wise, you will not feel much of a difference, between a 4mm and a 5mm drop.

Also, this drop will not feel as high as an 8mm drop. Basically from the drop category perspective, this is right in the grey zone.

Best 5mm heel-to-toe drop running shoes
Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka. All of these sports shoe brands are among the most popular running shoe brands…

They are comfortable and they have their own set of fan-following…

But between these three brands, is there anyone who shines the most? Let’s find out…

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Differences

1. Hoka shoe’s maximum drop is 6mm whereas both Saucony and Brooks have a maximum drop of 12mm.

2. Both Hoka and Brooks produce more types of sports shoes, whereas Saucony produces only running shoes.

3. Brooks manufactures all types of sports apparel including socks, Hoka has shorts, tops, and leggings and Saucony manufactures tops, bottoms, and innerwear for women.

4. Brooks has 4 trail-running models and 25 road running models of shoes, Hoka has 12 trail-running models and 20 road-running models of shoes, whereas Saucony has 5 trail-running models and 15 road-running models.

5. Between three brands Hoka has the thickest cushioning with a 40mm heel stack and a 36mm forefoot stack (Bondi) closely followed by Brooks Cascadia (39mm hs/35mm fs) and Saucony Endorphin Pro 2 and Saucony Hurricane 23 (39mm hs/31mm fs).

6. Between the three, Hoka has the most models of running shoes, followed by Brooks and Saucony in that order.

7. Between the three, Brooks shoes look more stylish whereas both Hoka and Saucony shoes have a bulky appearance.

Related: ON Running Vs Nike Sizing: Differences And Similarities

Hoka and New Balance: Similarities

  • The minimum drop of Hoka, Brooks, and Saucony is 4mm.
  • Brooks, Saucony, and Hoka are shifting towards eco-friendly and sustainable materials.
  • All three have running shoes in the maximal cushioning category.
  • All three manufacture running shoes for trails and roads.
  • All three brands have a non-restrictive fit.
  • All three use engineered mesh in the upper of their running shoes.
  • All three use a foam material that is a derivative of EVA foam.
  • All three have at least one model that has a carbon fiber plate.

Shoe Construction

As a runner, you may already have a favorite brand. It may be Hoka, Saucony, Brooks, or any other brand…

Choice of a running shoe is very personal…and between these three brands which you will prefer will also be completely based on the comfort that you feel in them.

For some, they may like the flex grooves of Brooks or the meta rocker technology of Hoka. Or, they may like the no-fuss minimalistic Saucony Kinvara.

There is no definite way to tell which shoe you will like the most, although, all of these are well constructed and all the companies have spent years together to perfect the comfort that these shoes provide…

So, let’s find out what these brands have to offer and how they will benefit you…

Midsole

When selecting a running shoe, one of the main things that you will look at is the midsole. This is a make-or-break for your purchase decision.

Then between Hoka, Brooks, and Saucony which fares the most and which is worthy of your investment…let’s find out…

When it comes to Brooks, there are only a couple of types of midsoles that are present. Each of these midsoles has its own characteristics and will provide you with a unique experience. We will describe each of them below…

Brooks midsole type: Cushion

The midsole material that falls in this category is the DNA LOFT. This is a carefully calibrated mix of mesh, air, and rubber to provide you with one of the softest and cushiest midsoles available on the market.

To come up with this material, Brooks has mixed EVA foam with rubber and air. This provides you with that soft and cushy feeling when you wear the shoes like Brooks Ghost, Brooks Adrenaline, etc.

Another type of midsole that belongs to the cushion category is the BioMoGo DNA. This was a similar type of material to DNA LOFT. However, in many shoes, Brooks is transitioning to DNA LOFT from BioMOGo DNA as the former is a bit softer and cushier.

Brooks midsole type: Energize

The cushion material that belongs to this category is the DNA AMP. It is a responsive material and provides you with excellent energy return rather than absorbing it.

The material is springy and bouncy and is not as soft as the DNA LOFT.

It is made from polyurethane (PU) foam which is encased in a thin layer of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU).

In this variation of PU that is being used in these shoes, you will find plastic combined with rubber for the firmness and the elasticity. The TPU also provides DNA AMP with additional rigidity.

Shoes that belong to this category are Brooks Levitate.

Brooks midsole type: Speed

This type of cushioning is meant for fast and adaptive energy return. The midsole material that is created for this purpose is built with nitrogen infusion.

It is a very lightweight midsole that is meant for speed and good energy return.

Another aspect that imparts the speed to these kinds of midsoles is the Carbon Fiber Propulsion Plate. This is an ultralight plate that helps to keep you in your preferred motion path so that you run more efficiently.

Shoes that belong to this category are Brooks Hyperion Tempo, Brooks Launch, Brooks Launch GTS, and Brooks Hyperion Elite.

Holistic GuideRails System

Apart from the midsole cushioning, there is another component that comes into play if you are dealing with overpronation.

To provide you with stability, Brooks has come up with something called Holistic GuideRails System.

This is excellent for providing you with support and bringing your knees back in the line of motion and protecting the knees from injuries.

Also, this is the standard technology that Brooks has incorporated in all of its stability shoes like Brooks Adrenaline GTS, Brooks Addiction GTS, Launch GTS, Brooks Beast, and Brooks Ariel.

Hoka Midsole

Like Brooks, Hoka also uses EVA foam as the base material for its midsoles however, it is being made into CMEVA or Compression-Molded EVA foam. This is the primary material for the midsole of Hoka Shoes.

Apart from CMEVA, for a more smooth and natural heel-to-toe transition, Hoka uses meta rocker technology which is present in almost all the Hoka shoes.

However, as mentioned earlier in the Hoka Vs New Balance post, there are basically two types of rocker technologies. The early-stage meta rocker and the late-stage meta rocker.

The difference between these two types of meta rockers is the position where the transition zone is placed.

In the case of an early-stage meta rocker, the transition zone is placed behind the metatarsals, whereas for a late-stage meta rocker, the transition zone is placed in front of the metatarsal.

For stability, Hoka uses a J-Frame which is basically a firmer foam on the medial side in the shape of a J. This provides additional support to the runners with overpronation.

For Hoka, there is another H-Frame technology that comes into play in some shoes like Gaviota. The midfoot H-Frame provides you with increased upper support and also locks down the midfoot.

Saucony Midsole

Saucony midsoles are also using the base material of EVA foam and have changed it to suit different types of running and cushioning requirements.

Here are some of the technologies that come into play in the midsole of Saucony running shoes:

PWRRUN

PWRRUN is one of the primary materials that are used in the midsoles of Saucony. It is a TPU EVA blend and provides you responsive and cushioned feeling.

All the subsequent midsole materials are mostly an enhanced version of PWRRUN except for VERSAFOAM.

You will find PWRRUN in Saucony Kinvara, Saucony Ride, Saucony Echelon, and Saucony Guide among others.

PWRRUN+

PWRRUN+ is an enhanced version of PWRRUN and is lighter, softer, and springier than PWRRUN.

This will provide you with excellent feedback and will keep your feet well protected.

Shoes that belong to the PWRRUN+ category are Hurricane, Triumph, Cohesion, etc.

PWRRUN PB

This is yet another improvement in PWRRUN. The PWRRUN PB midsoles are made from a PEBA-based midsole and are very soft.

The responsiveness of these midsoles is slightly less and will provide you with excellent cushioning.

Running shoes from Saucony that uses PWRRUN PB are Endorphin Pro, Freedom, etc.

VERSARUN

This is a durable cushioning that is based on EVA foam and is very responsive. This holds its shape for a variety of activities.

Shoes that use VERSARUN are Cohesion.

Carbon Fiber Plate

The carbon Fiber Plate is introduced in the Endorphin models of Saucony. This is extremely lightweight and durable and improves the responsiveness of these shoes.

It is great for speed shoes and is excellent for speed drills.

SPEED ROLL technology

This is an advanced technology which is basically a footwear geometry that provides you with an always forward feel.

S-CURVE Carbon Plate

This is the kind of carbon plate that is present in midsoles of shoes like Endorphin PRO. It is shaped in the form of a curve at the arch of the foot and it bends downwards slightly at the balls of the foot.

This improves the responsiveness of the shoe…

Related: Brooks Ghost Vs Saucony Endorphin Speed: Which One Is The Best Choice For You?

To improve the stability of the support shoes, Saucony uses an extended medial post. This stabilizes your feet and controls your overpronation.

If you try to compare the cushioning level of Saucony, Hoka, and Brooks, you will find all of them have all the varieties from ultra-plush cushioning to very responsive running shoes.

All of them have some models that incorporate the carbon fiber plate.

However, I felt, that the cushioning of DNA LOFT was slightly softer than that of PWRRUN and CMEVA. Being said that, I personally prefer a soft running shoe and have always liked DNA LOFT for that matter.

So, setting my bias aside, the kind of cushioning and responsiveness that these shoes provide is very good and you can consider them at par.

However, if you want to go for something which has an ultra-high level of cushioning then Bondi will be a great choice for neutral runners.

Go for Beast or Ariel if you are an overpronating runner. If you like minimal springy cushioning, the Saucony Kinvara should be your choice.

Outsole

The outsole of Hoka is mostly made of durable blown rubber which is highly abrasion-resistant.

This will provide you with an excellent grip on both wet and dry surfaces and is excellent for any kind of terrain.

The outsole of Hoka shoes is not completely covered with rubber. Instead, it has rubber stips placed on the high wear and tear prone areas. This reinforces those areas and improves durability.

Another type of outsole is common in Hoka. In this type, Hoka uses a rubberized version of CMEVA. Actually, this is not any separate layer, rather the exposed midsole layer is rubberized.

This way they saved up on the rubber strips of durable rubber and simultaneously lighten the overall weight of the shoe.

However, durability-wise, these outsoles are a bit less durable, and also the traction felt slightly lesser on the wet surfaces.

The outsole of Brooks employs similar things as in Hoka and Saucony to provide you with a durable outsole that has a good grip on both wet and dry surfaces.

It uses HPR rubber strips on the high wear and tears prone zones like the forefoot and the heels. The area between the forefoot and the heels is often devoid of such kind of rubber.

However, those areas are made in such a way that they don’t come in contact with the ground.

One thing that is common in all three brands is that they employ similar techniques to improve the flexibility of the sole.

To improve the durability of the shoe, the usage of hard rubber is probably the only option. However, that adds to the stiffness of the outsole.

For that, there are flex grooves present on the forefoot. For Brooks, they are called Omega Flex Grooves. However, based on the shoe model, the type of grooves that are used also differ.

For example, in Brooks Ghost, the grooves are almost horizontal, whereas, in Launch, it is more in the shape of an arrow pattern.

You will not see such a difference in the rest of the two brands which use almost horizontal grooves for imparting flexibility to the forefoot.

For trail running shoes Brooks uses TrailTack. This is a sticky rubber compound that provides excellent grip on the trails.

The outsole of Saucony basically uses blown rubber that is spread across the forefoot and the heels.

Also, the kind of techniques that Saucony uses is similar to that of Brooks and Hoka for improving the grip and flexibility of the shoes.

However, the technologies that Saucony uses vary greatly from these brands and also from its shoe to shoe.

The technologies that Saucony uses in its outsole are:

TRI-FLEX

It improves the force dispersion over a larger surface and provides excellent flexibility and traction. It is often used with the EVERUN topsole.

XT-600

This is a carbon rubber compound that is used for improved durability. They provide excellent traction as well.

XT-900

This is a carbon rubber that uses excellent traction and durability. It is an improvement on XT-600.

CRYSTAL RUBBER

It provides you with very high durability and great traction. This material is more flexible than the XT series and provides you with a more natural movement.

Grip-wise, I would consider all the three brands at par. However, the rubberized midsoles that are used in some of the models of Hoka and Saucony have slightly lesser durability. Other than that, the outsoles of all these three brands are at par.

Upper

There are a lot of things that go into the upper of Hoka, Brooks, and Saucony.

However, what is common in all of these brands is that mostly they use Engineered Mesh.

Hoka mainly uses two types of mesh materials…one is the engineered mesh and the other is engineered jacquard mesh.

In Jacquard mesh, you will find complex designs are directly knitted in the mesh…whereas engineered mesh will give you a more open feel…

The breathability of both of these types of meshes is good…However, the appearance of jacquard mesh is denser and thicker.

To reduce its carbon footprint, Hoka has started using recycled materials for its upper…although not all of the models have recycled material, Hoka is speedily shifting towards that…

Most of the upper of Hoka shoes have TPU overlays…these overlays are used to reinforce the midfoot structure of the shoes.

The tongue of Hoka shoes is made from a similar mesh material as that of the upper and gives it a more uniform look like that of the upper. This makes the tongue breathable and comfortable.

Also, the tongue may be gusseted/integrated or non-gusseted/free…However, being anatomically designed, they will sit on the top of your foot properly and will not move around unnecessarily.

Hoka has started using that extended pull tabs in many models like Clifton or Mach. This is an Achilles support and also helps you to wear the shoe more easily…Also, it enhances the overall appeal of the shoe.

The heel counter of Hoka shoes are well constructed and locks your heel in. This doesn’t allow your heels to move around for any unforeseen accidents and/or create blisters.

Most of the shoes from Hoka have a Silicone Print Logo, some are glossy and some have a matt finish. This only enhances the appeal of the Hoka Shoes.

These Hoka Shoes have a sockliner which is from OrthoLite and most of them are removable. These are molded EVA sockliner and provide you with comfort and proper arch support.

The upper of Brooks running shoes are mostly made up of engineered mesh with the exception of the shoes that use GORE-TEX or GTX. It doesn’t use jacquard mesh as Hoka uses in some of the models.

The mesh material is well ventilated and keeps the airflow high inside the shoe.

Brooks is gradually moving towards a more sustainable type of mesh and is using recycled materials in its upper.

This is helping them to reduce their carbon footprint and is contributing to a cleaner environment.

Similar to Hoka and Saucony, Brooks also uses a removable sockliner that is meant to provide you with excellent comfort and arch support.

These sockliners are also breathable keeping the overall in-shoe environment dry.

Apart from this similarity, Brooks like Hoka is shifting towards the extended pull tab look. This not only improves the style of the shoes but also provides you with an easy way to put on the shoe.

The tongue of the running shoes of the Brooks brand is well padded and is mostly made of mesh material.

This makes the tongue comfortable and breathable, and it sits comfortably between the laces and the skin of the top of your feet. This avoids rubbing the laces which may cause blisters.

Like Hoka, the tongue of Brooks shoes may be gusseted or non-gusseted based on the model. However, what I’ve seen is no matter which model you choose, the tongue stays in place while running.

If you look at the upper of Saucony, it also has engineered mesh on the different models. The mesh that Saucony uses is also very breathable and like Brooks will help to keep the in-shoe environment cool and dry.

However, it uses FORMFIT in different models to provide you with exceptional fit and stretch according to the shape of your feet.

Most of the models of Saucony have adopted that extended pull tab. However, that pull tab is not as evident as that in Hoka or Brooks. If you are not observant, you will surely miss it. However, this also provides that added support to your Achilles area.

Also, the tongue of the shoes of Saucony is thick and well padded like its collar. This will keep you comfortable and will not move around while running.

In most of the models of Saucony, the tongue is anatomically designed and will provide you with the utmost comfort.

The laces that all these brands have adopted is a flat lace. They are mostly polyester laces that remain in place and are properly tied when you are running.

All the models have overlays on them. This reinforces the support of the upper and also enhances the overall style of the shoe.

Comfort-wise, the upper of all the three brands are at par, however, style-wise, I like Brooks more, followed by Hoka and then Saucony. This is a personal preference though, and it may vary for you.

Related: 10 Best Walking Shoes For Blister Prone Feet (Highly Rated)

Other Considerations

Hoka, Brooks and Saucony have a lot of similarities. All the brands produce running shoes whose most models are true to size although the way represent sizing may differ a bit. The cushioning is great, and so is the overall comfort.

Related: Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

However, there are a lot of differences. Firstly, Hoka is a low-drop shoe brand whereas both Saucony and Brooks have many models that have higher drops.

But most importantly, it is how they handle their cushioning which we have covered in great detail above.

Durability

Typically a Hoka shoe will last you for around 350 miles. After that, you may start to see the wear and tear.

Since most of the Hoka shoes fall in the max cushioned category, this is expected. I would invest in a good shoe that lasts for some lesser miles than spend the same money on a physician to fix the problems caused by a cheap running shoe.

For Brooks and Saucony, the durability is slightly higher around 400 to 450 miles. From a running distance perspective that may be another 1 month extra of running.

This is where I feel, Brooks fares slightly better.

Cushioning

The primary cushioning material of Hoka is CMEVA. It is a very cushy and responsive material. However, I feel, this is slightly stiffer than DNA LOFT which is one of the primary cushioning materials from Brooks.

Related: Hoka Bondi Vs Clifton – Which Hoka Is Best For Your Feet?

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton – Which One Is Best For Your Feet?

Also, the PWRRUN or its further enhancements that you find in Saucony is soft and cushy. The cushioning is good and comfortable, but the bounciness could have been better.

However, that is slightly better with Hoka and Brooks.

It is hard to decide on which one is better as all the cushions score some points in one aspect and lose some in the other. But nonetheless, all of them are very comfortable. The final choice will be the kind that you would want…

Overall Fit And Comfort

The overall fit of both Brooks and Hoka are similar as both of them has a wideish fit. Saucony on the other hand, for some of the models, has a bit of a snug fit.

However, one big shortcoming of Hoka is that, apart from the popular models like Bondi and Clifton, most of the other models don’t have a wide fit.

This is true for Saucony as well, where apart from the models Kinvara and Triumph there are no wide shoes.

Brooks shines in this aspect. It has a wide and extra wide-fitting shoe for most of its models. This is good news for runners like me who have bunions. We need running shoes that are wider on the forefoot.

Related: 6 Best Running Shoes For Tailor’s Bunion

Pricing

The starting price of Brooks running shoes is around $75 and in the range between $75 to $100, you have a lot of variety including trail running shoes.

However, with Hoka, the starting price of their road running range is around $130. You will not find a road running shoe in the $50-$100 range.

For Saucony, the starting price is around $85. Also, in the price range up to $100, you will not have a lot of options.

So, if you want to just try out a Hoka or Saucony, then you will have to pay a little more than Brooks. Also, the choices that you will have, may not be what you want.

However, for the most premium shoes, all the models, the prices reach slightly above $200.

So, if you don’t want to spend a lot of money, then you can go for Brooks…

However, if you have a budget of $100 or above, you have options from all of these brands.

Conclusion

If you compare Saucony Vs Hoka Vs Brooks, all of these brands almost are at par.

There are a couple of places where Hoka gets a few extra points and in others, Brooks or Saucony scores high.

So, if we want to pick a winner then it will not be fair to the other two Brands. The whole thing that the choice between these brands will boil down to the kind of comfort you feel in these shoes.

For me, I prefer Brooks and I cannot describe all the reasons why…but it feels more comfortable for me…and I don’t end up with bunion pain.

Other than that, I loved the shoes of all the three brands and you will love them as well…

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.