Top 10 Best Asics Gel-Hyperspeed Alternatives That Are Its Perfect Replacement [2020]

Top 10 Best Asics Gel-Hyperspeed Alternatives That Are Its Perfect Replacement [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. I may recieve a commission if you purchase something mentioned in this post. See more details here.
ASICS Hyperspeed is a lightweight running or training shoes and performs remarkably. It is light-weight with optimum cushioning which helps you to perform better.

However, these running shoes have been discontinued and you may be searching for running shoes that are comparable to the. So here are the best ASICS Hyperspeed alternatives and our comparison baseline is Asics Hyperspeed 7.

Let’s find out what are the top alternatives for Asics Hyperspeed 7.

The Best Asics Gel Hyper Speed Alternatives

Last update on 2020-10-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes the same as Asics Hyperspeed.
  • Good for running on the treadmill, training, and roads.
  • Good forefoot and heel cushioning similar to Hyperspeed.
  • Almost the same weight as Asics Hyperspeed.

Let’s understand Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7

If you want to pick the right replacement for Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7 you need to understand the qualities of these running shoes.

Otherwise, you may pick up something like this one, which will give you a disastrous result.

Unless you are not aware of the features and design of Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7, you may not be able to compare it with its alternatives.

Gel Hyper Speed 7 is a daily running shoe which is also great as a trainer.

These running shoes are long-lasting, comfortable and have superior fit.

It has rear foot gel cushioning that is great for shock absorption.

Also the shoe is made of seamless materials that are ergonomically designed to ensure long lasting comfort.

Outsole of this running shoe is made from blown rubber which is great at durability and grip. As with other models from ASICS, the outsole of this one is made from AHAR or ASICS High Abrasion Rubber.

It comes with removable sock-liner and which can be replaced with orthotics if needed.

The upper of the shoe is made of open mesh and has a seamless design for an irritation free experience.

With printed design, lesser overlays and bright colors, the overall look feels very upbeat.

Now let’s talk about the mid-sole…

The mid-sole of Gel Hyper Speed 7 comes with fore-foot gel cushioning system that makes it great for forefoot strikers.

Also, the SpEVA foam in the midsole makes these shoes lightweight and cushy.

Running shoes similar to Brooks Launch – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
BROOKS GHOST 13

Brooks Ghost 13 is our first preference for ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed.

Brooks Ghost 13 is a neutral running shoe that is similar to ASICS Gel Hyper Speed.

However, Brooks Ghost 13 is more comfortable and due to the use of more DNA LOFT material in this current version. ASICS Hyperspeed on the other hand has SpEVA foam which is kind of firmer but is very good at shock absorption.

Both of these running shoes are great for road running, cross-training, the gym.

The Ghost 13 offers an engineered Air Mesh Upper that promises a secure fit and also delivers breathability that enhances running performance.

Breathability-wise, ASICS Gel Hyperspeed is also good as it comes with an open mesh which helps in unrestricted air flow.

Also, Gel Hyper Speed 7 optimizes moisture drainage and also improves breathability.

The forefoot of Gel Hyper Speed 7 comes with ASICS Gel Cushioning which is soft and acts as a great shock absorber.

For Ghost 13, the DNA LOFT  cushioning makes these running shoes very comfortable and offers a smooth ride from landing to toe-off.

Finally, the out-sole of both shoes is made of rubber material that enhances the life of the shoe. 

However, one big difference between Brooks Ghost and ASICS Hyperspeed is that they vary greatly in the heel drop.

Hyperspeed has a drop of around 6 mm whereas Ghost has a whopping 12mm. You must consider this before giving Ghost a try.

+ POSITIVES

  • BioMoGo DNA and DNA LOFT cushioning that provide softness underfoot experience.
  • Very Comfortable, lightweight and durable.
  • 3D fit print and offers soft secure fit.
  • Breathable upper so your feet feel dry all day long.
  • Segmented Crash Pad that offers stable ride every time.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some users are not happy with the color.
  • Durability may be a bit less.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)
NEW BALANCE FRESH FOAM BEACON V2, top choice for Asics Hyperspeed alternative

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 can serve you as one of the best Asics gel hyperspeed 7 replacement.

New Balance Beacon V2 is a light-weight well-cushioned running shoe that is similar to Asics gel hyperspeed.

Also, it is a neutral shoe like Hyperspeed and will keep you as comfortable as later.

One of the biggest difference between Hyperspeed with Ghost was the heel to toe drop.

However, with New Balance Beacon this is also not a problem. Hyperspeed has a drop of 6mm which is the same drop that Beacon has.

In terms of weight also, Beacon v2 is similar to that of Hyperspeed. Both stand at around 6-7 oz.

However, in terms of comfort, New Balance Beacon is a bit more comfortable as its midsole is made from Fresh Foam. Hyperspeed has SpEVA foam and is a bit firmer.

The outsole of Beacon has ground contact EVA Foam, with rubber pods placed strategically placed at heels and forefoot.  The minimize the shoe weight and makes it long-lasting.

The outsole of Hyperspeed is made AHAR or ASICS High Abrasion Rubber which is a kind of long-lasting rubber that provides you with superior durability and grip.

The upper of Beacon V2 has a soft upper made with Engineered knit fabric.  It has Ultra Heel Construction for narrower rearfoot.  This keeps the heel intact and more secure.

The Hyperspeed has open-air mesh which provides you with very good breathability. Also, the ankle area is well cushioned and will help you to keep your feet more stable.

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 makes it suitable for speed and tempo run. This can also be used for long-distance, road, or treadmill running and cross-training.

The Asics Hyperspeed is also very lightweight and is a great one for training, long-distance, road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for training purposes.
  • Very good shock absoption.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.

 NEGATIVES

  • Durability seems to be a bit less.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
SALOMON SPEEDCROSS 5

Salomon Speedcross 5 seems to be the least likely choice as a running shoe that is similar to Asics Hyperspeed.

However, hear me out. 

Although Salomon Speedcross is a trail running shoe, here are the reasons why it can be another great option in place of Asics Hyperspeed 7.

The outsole of this running shoe is made from blown rubber which provides it with grip and durability.

This is similar to Asics Hyperspeed which has AHAR rubber as its outsole. The difference in the outsole is that Speedcross has lugs that will keep you stable in the trails.

The midsole of Salomon Speedcross 5 is made from LT Muscle which is rugged yet cushiony. In this aspect also, this is similar to Hyperspeed which has SpEVA foam as the midsole and is tough yet cushy.

The upper of Salomon Speedcross is made from engineered mesh with rubberized overlays. This makes it decently breathable.

The Upper of Hyperspeed is also very airy and is made from air mesh which is great in terms of breathability.

However, Salomon Speedcross 5 is a bit heavier than Asics Hyperspeed 7. Speedcross weighs around 10oz whereas Hyperspeed weighs around 6oz.

In terms of the heel to toe drop, Salomon Speedcross has more drop than Asics Hyperspeed. Salomon Speedcross has a 10mm drop whereas Asics Hyperspeed has a 6mm drop.

If you are a trail runner and is looking for something that is similar to Asics Hyperspeed, then Salomon Speedcross may be a good option.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsive and light-weight.
  • Sock-like fit which makes the stride secure.
  • The outsole gives a good grip for running on dry or wet surfaces.
  • The upper is dirt resistant.
  • Comes in very vibrant colors.
  • Long lasting.

+ NEGATIVES

  • The width seems to be a bit less.
  • The sole is on the stiffer side.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
NIKE AIR ZOOM PEGASUS 36

The Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is one of the most preferred alternatives for Asics Gel-Hyperspeed 7 running shoes.

Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is a neutral running shoe like Asics gel-hyperspeed 7. Also, it is a great choice for road running and training much like Asics Hyperspeed.

However, the weight of, Air Zoom Pegasus is approx 10oz/272 g, which is a little more than Asics Gel Hyperspeed 7. This difference, however, will not make much of a difference for shorter running distances.

Heel to toe drop of Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is around 10mm which is a bit more than Asics Gel Hyperspeed and you will be able to feel the difference if you are used to a low drop shoe.

However, this will be beneficial for runners who are prone to Achilles Tendon problems and this running shoe may prevent Achilles tendonitis.

The main difference however lies in the midsole of these shoes.

Nike Air Zoom has a Zoom Air unit. This is an air-bag unit that runs right from the heel to toe. This is supplemented with cushioning provided by the Cushion ST Foam.

Together, they provide good shock absorption and responsiveness.

For Asics Hyperspeed, however, the midsole is made from SpEVA foam and is great at providing cushioning.

The upper of the shoe is designed using Flymesh fabric. This is a very durable and highly breathable material. It keeps your feet cool even while running in the heat.

Nike Air Zoom Pegasus has an aerodynamic shape that helps you with improved speed.

Improved fitting around the heels due to a snugger fit and the trimmed down collar and tongue reduce the shoe weight without reducing the comfort.

The shoelaces are intact with Nike’s Flywire, which gives you a tight and secure fit even when you are running at a very high speed.

Asics Hyperspeed on the other hand has a seamless open mesh that makes it very breathable.

The outsole of Pegasus has strategically placed rubber pods to reduce the overall shoe-weight and at the same time providing appropriate traction.

Hyperspeed has AHAR outsole for better grip and durability.

Pegasus comes with the midfoot transition sole for a smooth toe to heel transitioning and is very much suited for long-distance running. They are great for running on firm surfaces – road, treadmill, or even hard trail.

Hyperspeed is much more suited for shorter distance running and for training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Aerodynamic design for better speed.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good shock absorption.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Comes in nice attractive colors.
  • Durable and lightweight.
  • Highly breathable.
  • Good for runners suffering from calf problems or Achilles tendonitis.

 NEGATIVES

  • Laces may put pressure on the foot.
  • Narrower toe-box.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
Saucony Triumph ISO 5 specs-min

If you like cushy comfort, then you will love Saucony Triumph ISO 5 as an alternative for Asics Gel Hyperspeed.

The midsole of Saucony Triumph ISO 5 is made from EVA foam and comes with an added cushioning of EVERUN midsole.

This makes them very comfortable and provides you with a plush and soft feeling. These running shoes are more comfortable than Asics Hyperspeed and will help you run for a longer duration of time.

The upper Saucony Triumph ISO 5 is made of engineered mesh and boasts of ISOFit technology. This provides you with a comfortable fit.

Asics Gel-Hyperspeed 7 on the other hand has open-air mesh which is also very comfortable and breathable.

The outsole of Saucony Triumph ISO 5 is made from blown rubber whereas for Asics Hyperspeed it is made from AHAR rubber.

However, both of these running shoes provide you with a great grip, however, Triumph seems to be a little less durable than Hyperspeed. 

Also, comparatively, Triumph has a roomier toe-box and overall wider fit. This may not be comfortable for runners with narrower feet.

Saucony Triumph has a little more heel to toe drop and is around 8mm whereas Asics Gel-Hyperspeed has a drop of around 6mm.

This drop is not noticeable but it makes Triumph a preferred choice for runners with Achilles issues.

+ POSITIVES

  • Comfortable and cushy.
  • Lightweight and plush.
  • Roomy toe-box.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Good for long-distance running as well as for trail running.
  • Good for heavier runners.

+ NEGATIVES

  • Overall wider fit may not be preferable for runners with a narrower foot.
  • May be a bit heavier.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
SAUCONY COHESION 13

Saucony Cohesion 13 is your other option for Asics Gel-Hyperspeed Running Shoes.

Since this is a neutral running shoe, it is into the same category as Asics Gel-Hyperspeed.

It is slightly heavier than Asics Hyperspeed and weighs around 9oz. This heaviness may be due to the cushioning of the midsole.

However, the most significant difference between Cohesion 13 and Gel Hyperspeed is that Cohesion 13 has a drop of around 12mm whereas Asics Hyperspeed 7 has a drop of around 6mm.

Saucony Cohesion 13 comes with the VERSARUN midsole which is great at shock absorption and also reduces pressure on your feet.

Asics Gel-Hyperspeed comes with a SpEVA midsole and provides you with springy yet impact-resistant cushioning.

The outsole of Cohesion uses high abrasion rubber for better durability and traction. The segmented outsole provides you with a better heel to toe transition.

The outsole of Gel Hyperspeed uses the AHAR rubber and adds to the flexibility and durability of the shoes.

The upper of Saucony Cohesion 13 has a breathable mesh that will provide you with a comfortable fit. The collar and tongue of this running shoe are sufficiently padded and will keep your ankles more stable.

The upper of Asics Gel-Hyperspeed also has breathable mesh and provides you with and cool and airy environment during running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Good cushioning and lightweight.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Can support runners with neutral to underpronation.
  • Technical to look at.
  • Good for runners with plantar fasciitis.

+ NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems to be a bit off.
  • Durability seems to be a bit less.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
ASICS GEL NIMBUS -22

ASICS Gel-Nimbus 22 is more of a all rounder shoe and can be used for both roads and trails.

They are lightweight and sturdy and provides you with a very energetic ride.

This is the reason that this is one of our top choices for Asics gel-Hyperspeed alternatives.

Also, this is a neutral running shoe much like ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed and comes with flytefoam propel technology in the midsole.

This makes it lightweight and helps you perform better and faster.

Also, the fore foot and rear foot gel cushioning attenuates any kind of shock and helps you to have an injury free running experience.

This is also similar to ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed and provides you with a great running experience.

Both of these shoes have AHAR or ASICS High Abrasion Rubber as the outsole. This provides these running shoes with exceptional durability.

Much like Hyperspeed, Nimbus is also a low drop shoe which makes it a great alternative to Hyperspeed.

+ POSITIVES

  • Comfortable and cushioned running experience.
  • Responsive and lightweight.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Flytefoam technology for reduced weight and performance.
  • Durable.
  • Suitable for both roads and trails.

 NEGATIVES

  • Toe box seems to be on the narrower side.
  • It may feel stiffer for people with sensitive feet.

You can look into Nike Zoom Fly 3 if you are looking for an alternative for ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed. 

This is a neutral running shoe, much like Hyperspeed, and will provide you with great running experience.

In the midsole, it has Lunarlon cushioning which is a combination of hard and soft foam and provides you with the perfect combination of shock absorption, stability, and responsiveness.

Also, in the midsole, it has a nylon and carbon sole plate which can shrink and expand for maximum flexibility in your stride.

The heel arches away from the ankle to relieve pressure on your Achilles tendon thus providing a preventive measure for Achilles injury.

However, the weight of this running shoe is a bit more than the Hyperspeed however that will not make much of a difference in your run.

Also, there is a minor difference in the heel drop and it has a differential of almost 8mm whereas Hyperspeed has somewhere around 6mm.

The upper is made from seamless one-piece fly mesh and provides you with very good breathability and fit.

Also, this running shoe looks a bit different than your traditional running shoes and you are bound to stand out in the crowd.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsive and lightweight.
  • Carbon fiber plate expands and contracts with your stride.
  • Excellent for runners with neutral pronation.
  • Strikingly stylish.
  • Great shock absorption

 NEGATIVES

  • Early wear and tear signs may develop.
  • For some, the back of the shoe felt narrow.

Meet Hoka One One Rincon 6, our next candidate on this list.

Hoka Rincon is also a neutral running shoe, much like Asics Gel-Hyperspeed.

However, weight-wise, it is heavier than Hyperspeed and weighs around 8 oz.

The heel drop is 5 mm which is one of the closest to Hyperspeed but is lesser than it.

The midsole is designed using the compressed EVA Foam and provides Rincon with a balanced cushioning. This makes the midsole light-weight and gives a soft feel to the foot.

The early-staged meta rocker geometry design provides you with an easier heel-to-toe off.

The midsole of Hyperspeed is made from SpEVA foam and provides it with a snappy, responsive feel.

The outsole of Rincon has high abrasion rubber present on the most impacted areas i.e under the front foot and heels. Using the rubber strategically reduces the weight of the shoe.

However, the outsole of Hyperspeed is made up of AHAR rubber makes it very durable and grippy.

The upper of Rincon is made with a light-weight single-layered mesh. This provides high breathability.

Hyperspeed has open mesh for high breathability. This keeps the in-shoe environment very healthy while you are running.

Rincon can be used for road running. The high cushioning makes it suitable for both long and short distance running.

Hyperspeed is a multipurpose shoe and can be used for running, gym and cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and soft.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • The shoe design adds momentum.
  • Durable.
  • Highly breathable.
  • True to size.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off.

Nike Air Zoom Vomero 14 is our next alternative.

This is a neutral running shoe with a heel drop of 10 mm. This is a bit more than ASICS Gel-Hyperspeed.

However, it is a bit heavier than Hyperspeed…

The midsole is designed for an ultra-plush ride with greater responsiveness to the shoe. It has a full-length Nike’s Zoom unit running from heel to toe. The zoom unit along and the React technology together guarantees a soft, smooth, and snappy ride.

The midsole of Hyperspeed is designed using SpEVA foam. This provides you with optimal cushioning and a responsive ride.

The outsole of Vomero uses hard carbon in the entire outsole reason that gives improved traction.

The outsole of Hyperspeed is made up of AHAR rubber is very durable and rugged.

The upper of Vomero is made with a sleek engineered mesh designed for longer durability and support. The Dynamic Fit technology used here combines with Flywire and soft foam to give better support to the midfoot. The forefoot space is very roomy and even has a wider toe-box. The heel collar comes with foam pods which gives better support to the rear foot.

The upper of Hyperspeed is designed using the open mesh and has a  breathable design. 

The Vomero 14 is great for running on-road or treadmill and for running any distance.

The Asics Hyperspeed is more of a multipurpose running shoe that can be used for running, training, cross-training, and other sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Lightweight.
  • Reduced running hangover.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems to be a bit off.
Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Related Posts

Asic Gel-Hyperspeed Running Shoes Alternatives. These are the best running shoes for hyperspeed. Try out these running shoes.

Asic Gel-Hyperspeed Running Shoes Alternatives. These are the best running shoes for hyperspeed. Try out these running shoes.

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

Adidas Solar Boost vs Solar Glide : Which Adidas is best for you in [2020]?

Adidas Solar Boost vs Solar Glide : Which Adidas is best for you in [2020]?

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. I may recieve a commission if you purchase something mentioned in this post. See more details here.

Adidas’ Solar Boost and Solar Glide, the first thing that catches your eyes is Solar, isn’t it?

Well, it is just not Solar which is common but they share a lot more features in common. 

So without taking any further of your time let’s take a deeper look into Adidas Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide.

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide Header Image-min

This is our winner

Last update on 2020-10-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Adidas Solar Boost 19 Sneaker

Why it is better?

  • More forgiving cushioning.
  • Excellent protection.
  • Truly customized fit.
  • Great for both long and short distance running.
  • Comes in more number of widths.
  • Long lasting.

Adidas Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide – An Overview

Both Adidas SolarBoost and Solar Glide are neutral running shoes designed for the high arch runners.

Then how are these two running shoes different?

The main difference between them is the shoe upper.

So, let’s begin…

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide – Features at a glance

Adidas Solar Boost 19Adidas Solar Glide 19
adidas Solarboost 19 Shoes Men's, Blue, Size 6.5adidas Women's Solar Glide 19 W Sneaker, d Grey/White/Sky Tint, 8.5 M US
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!
Price$70.76$97.96
TypeNeutralNeutral
Heel-to-toe Drop10mm10mm
Weight312g283g
Arch SupportHighHigh
Midsole TypeBoostBoost
TechnologyBoost, Stabilizing Torsion System, Energy Guide Rails, Tailored Fiber PlacementBoost, Stabilizing Torsion System, Energy Guide Rails, Hepatic Print Overlay
Sizes5.0 – 12.0 (Women)
6.5 – 14.0 (Men)
10.5 – 11.0 (Women)
8.5 -14 (Men)
WidthNarrow,
Normal
Normal, Wide
UseLong Distance, Daily Running, Marathon, RoadLong Distance, Daily Running, Marathon, Road, Treadmill
Editor’s Rating4 and a half star-92X25-min4 and a half star-92X25-min
Find on Amazon!Find on Amazon!

The main differences between Adidas Solar Boost Vs Adidas Solar Glide

  • Shoe upper
  • Solar Glide is lighter than SolarBoost. Solar Glide weighs around 283g whereas SolarBoost weighs 312g.
  • The Solar Boost toe-box is designed for narrow to the normal foot. Solar Glide however has a wider toe-box more suitable for runners with normal to wide foot.
  • Solar Glide can be used for road and treadmill running. Solar Boost can be used for road running.
  • Solar Glide is more durable than Solarboost.
  • Solarboost is more comfortable to use than Solar Glide.

Solar Boost Vs. Solar Glide – A head to head comparison

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide Core Specs

So far we have broadly seen the differences between Solar Glide and Solar Boost.

However, there is a lot more to it.

Let’s have a deeper look and find out.

Outsole

Both Solar Glide and SolarBoost have the same outsole.

They have a layer of Continental rubber present on the full length of the shoe.

Continental is well known for producing tire.

The rubber on the outsole covers and protects the shoe midsole from the abrasive surface conditions, thereby minimizing the wear and tear of the shoes.

The rubber on the outsole gives tremendous traction and makes it useful to be used in all weather conditions and especially on wet surfaces.

The Stretch-web technology demonstrated in both these shoes adds to the flexibility of the shoe.

This technology makes the outsole adaptive towards the footstrike of the runner, offering a smoother ride. 

Midsole

The midsole of both Adidas SolarBoost 19 and Solar Glide 19 are identical.

The main component of the midsole is the full-length Boost.

The Boost is made up of tiny capsules, called the TPU Pellets.

The layer of Boost running from forefoot to heel give ultimate cushioning to the underfoot.

The TPU Pellets are designed to minimize the shock waves upon landing and are capable of returning energy.

The high energy return, maximum shock absorption, and cushioned ride experience ultimately improve the running efficiency.

Another crucial component of the midsole is the Solar Propulsion Rail and the Torsion system.

Both these shoes have the guide rails running across the edge of the shoes. 

The guide rails are designed to reduce the lateral movement of the foot when the foot lands. 

Another feature of the midsole of these shoes is the Torsion system. 

This is a thermoplastic unit placed in the midfoot. 

The Torsion system decouples the front foot from the rearfoot. 

This enables a smoother transition of the foot. 

 So, along with cushioned midsole, you get the improved running gait cycle.

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide Pros and Cons

Upper

The main difference in the design of Solarboost and Solar Glide is the shoe upper.

The Solarboost upper is made with an engineered mesh.  This fabric is designed with a multi-layered construction. The design facilitates the fabric to expand and retain the shape of the foot as it moves.  The fine air pockets on the mesh give excellent ventilation and keep the foot dry and cool.

It also utilizes the Tailored Fiber Placement (TFP) technology to undertake the stitched-on material as an overlay on the SolarBoost 19 upper. The fiber is made with recycled plastic. These overlays present on the shoe upper, support the upper of the shoe.  It also keeps the foot secure and provides comfort and stability.

The upper also comes with a well-fitted heel counter.  It is made up of thermoplastic pods present on both sides of the heel collar. The heel counter holds the heel very secure and prevents it from coming out in a jerk. The heel counter is smooth and padded and keeps your for rear very secure.

The shoe comes with a narrow to moderate width. This may give a little tight fit to some runner. The toe-box is shallow. The tongue is moderately padded and comes with a smooth internal sleeve.

 The upper of Solar Glide is designed using the engineered mesh material. The fabric of the upper is light-weight, soft to touch, and offers the breathability of the foot. The air circulation inside the shoe keeps your feet dry and sweat-free even if you are running under hot humid conditions. The fabric is stretchy liberating your natural foot movement.

The upper bears the hepatic print overlay which is designed to provide lateral stability to the foot movement and keeps the foot secure.

The toe-box has sufficient depth and it has a roomy and wider forefoot space. The tongue is soft and thin. The upper is almost seamless and it does not have an internal sleeve.

The Solar Glide also has a FitHeel Counter similar to that of SolarBoost.

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide Durability

Weight

The weight of SolarBoost and Solar Glide is very much close to each other.

SolarBoost weighs around 11 oz/312 g whereas Solar Glide weighs  10 oz/283 g.

The closeness in weight could be due to their design.

They both have an identical midfoot and outsole and minimum difference in their upper. 

Price

Price-wise also, there is not much difference between Adidas Solarboost Vs Solarglide.

However, currently, Solar boost 19 is available at a heavy discount.

Otherwise, you will get them in the range of around $100 – $150.

That’s all with the differences and similarities between Solar Boost 19 and Solar Glide 19.

If you want to look at some alternatives to both the shoes, then read on…

Similar Shoes

Running Shoes Similar To Adidas Solar Boost 19

A lot of running shoes serve as a very good alternative to Adidas Solar Boost.

We have captured some of the best Solarboost alternatives in our post.

However, here is our top choice.

Brooks Glycerin 18 Running Shoes
837 Reviews
Brooks Glycerin 18 Running Shoes
  • THIS SHOE IS FOR: The Glycerin 18 is perfect for runners who think there's no such thing as too much cushioning. The upper enhances comfort by perfectly balancing stretch and structure.
  • SUPPORT AND CUSHION: Provides neutral support while offering the maximum amount of cushioning. Ideal for road running, cross training, the gym or wherever you might want to take them! Predecessor: Glycerin 17.
  • SUPER-SOFT CUSHIONING: Increased DNA LOFT super-soft cushioning allows for even more extreme softness, without losing responsiveness or durability, while the OrthoLite sockliner provides premium step-in comfort.

Last update on 2020-10-27 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Running Shoes Similar to Adidas Solar Glide 19

A lot of running shoes can serve as a good alternative to Solar Glide 19.

We are still working on the list of similar shoes to Adidas Solar Glide. We would be updating this section as soon as we have the list ready.

However, here is what we think will be perfect for you:

Brooks Ghost 13 Running Shoes
  • THIS SHOE IS FOR: The Ghost 13 is for runners looking for a reliable shoe that's soft and smooth. The Ghost 13 offers improved transitions for zero distractions so you can focus more on what matters most: your run.
  • SUPPORT AND CUSHION: The neutral support type provideds high energizing cushioning. Ideal for road running, cross training, the gym or wherever you might want to take them! Predecessor: Ghost 12
  • BALANCED, SOFT CUSHIONING: BioMoGo DNA and DNA LOFT cushioning work together to provide a just-right softness underfoot without losing responsiveness and durability - yet it feels lighter than ever.

Last update on 2020-10-27 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Conclusion

We have tried to provide you all the required details in this “Adidas Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide review” post.

You will get all the required information so that you can pick the running shoe that is perfect for yourself.

However, Solar Glide is being phased out and this is the reason that we have chosen Adidas Solar Boost over Adidas Solar Glide.

Let us know if you have any further questions.

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide. The best running shoes compared again. Find out which running shoe wins.

Solar Boost Vs Solar Glide. The best running shoes compared again. Find out which running shoe wins.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Latest Comparisons

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

The Top 10 Best Hoka One One Clifton Alternatives You Can Safely Try In 2020

The Top 10 Best Hoka One One Clifton Alternatives You Can Safely Try In 2020

Last Updated: October 8th, 2020

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

Today, we shall see the best alternative for Hoka One One Clifton. This is a perfect combination of soft and light running shoes.  To compare Clifton with the other available alternatives, we consider Hoka One One Clifton 7 (affiliate link) as our baseline model.

Let’s see the best available alternative for Clifton.

The Best Hoka One One Clifton 7 Alternative

Last update on 2020-10-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

(affiliate link)

Brooks Glycerin 18

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes the same as Clifton 
  • Support runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for running on the treadmill, and roads and long-distance running.

Check this on Amazon!(affiliate link)

Let’s understand Hoka One One Clifton

Today we are presenting on the alternatives for Hoka One One Clifton 7.

But, before we list out the various options, let us first dive into the details of Clifton.

This is very important as if you do not know about Clifton 7, you will not be able to compare the other running shoes with Clifton and select them wisely.

Hoka One One Clifton is a neutral running shoe for runners with medium to high arches.

It weighs around 9.1oz/242 g and has a heel drop of 5 mm.

Clifton has a midsole designed using the EVA foam. This makes it utmost soft and responsive and at the same time checks on the shoe weight also. The cushioning increases the shock absorption potential of the shoe along with comfort.

The most string feature of this shoe is that it uses the early stage meta rockered geometry. This technology minimizes the foot transition time and gives a smooth toe-off. This improves running efficiency.

The outsole of Clifton is made of EVA form with high abrasion rubber pods strategically placed to maximize the durability of the shoe and give a better grip. The use of less rubber on the outsole considerably reduces the shoe weight.

The upper of Clifton comes with an Engineered Mesh. The shoe fabric is soft, breathable, and highly durable. It comes with side embroideries with locks the mid-foot area to make the shoe more secure. Its collar and tongue padding make the shoe more comfortable.

Clifton 7 can be used for long-distance, road, and treadmill running and also for cross-training.

Running shoes similar to Hoka One One Clifton – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
BROOKS GLYCERIN 18

Brooks Glycerin 18 is our first preference for Hoka One One Clifton 6.

Both these shoes are designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches.

Glycerin, however, has a little more heel drop than Clifton, 10 mm, and slightly heavier than Clifton. This weight difference is not significant as it does not really impact your performance.

Glycerin has a super-soft cushioning owing to DNA Loft material in the midsole. Additionally, the Ortholite sock-liner is present which adds extra comfort.

Clifton has EVA foam present in the midsole which makes very cushy and highly shock absorbing.

Glycerin has an outsole made with blown rubber. The outsole design gives a smooth heel to toe transition.

Clifton has EVA foam with rubber pods placed strategically in the outsole. This renders better durability and traction of the shoe.

Glycerin has the upper made with 3D Fit Print. The plush fit adds to the flexibility and comfort.

The upper of Clifton is designed using an engineered mesh. This is a light-weight, breathable, and durable fabric.  The embroidery present on the midfoot makes the fit more secure.

Glycerin is used for long-distance, road, and treadmill running.

Clifton can also be used for long-distance, road, and treadmill running and cross-training.

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Very soft and cushy
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Lightweight.
  • Ortholite sock-liner is present.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off. Order the next size if you wear a thick sock.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)
NEW BALANCE FRESH FOAM BEACCON V2

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon V2 is our next alternative for Clifton.

Beacon V2 is a light-weight  well-cushioned running shoe.

It is also a neutral running shoe for runners with a medium arch, same as Clifton.

The heel drop of Beacon V2 is 6mm, closest to that of Clifton.

Beacon is just a little lighter than Clifton.

The most remarkable feature of Beacon is the midsole design.

This has a  midsole designed with a thick layer of Fresh Foam ground contact material. The thick layer of cushioning makes the shoe very comfortable and shock absorbing. This Fresh Foam cushioning accounts for the light-weight of the shoe. In spite of the thick cushion, it doesn’t give a plush feel rather the feel is firm.

The midsole of Clifton has Eva Foam cushioning. This makes the shoe soft and responsive.

The outsole of Beacon has ground contact EVA Foam, with rubber pods placed strategically placed at heels and forefoot.  The minimize the shoe weight and makes it long-lasting.

Even Clifton also has an EVA Foam outsole with rubber pods.

The upper of Beacon V2 has a soft upper made with Engineered knit fabric.  It has Ultra Heel Construction for narrower rearfoot.  This keeps the heel intact and more secure.

The upper of Clifton is designed using an Engineered mesh which is durable, light, soft, and breathable.

The light-weight and shock absorption feature of the Fresh Foam Beacon V2 makes it suitable for speed and tempo run. This can also be used for long-distance, road, or treadmill running and cross-training.

Clifton is used for long-distance, road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with normal arches.
  • Good for neutral runner
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Firm rearfoot grip to keep the foot secure
  • Good shock absorption

 NEGATIVES

  • Some users may find narrow rearfoot design not very comfortable.
  • Early wear and tear signs may appear
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

NIKE EPIC REACT FLYKNIT 2

Nike Epic React FlyKnit 2 is our next alternative to Hoka One One Clifton 6.

Like Clifton, this is also a neutral running shoe.

It weighs around 8.7oz/ 247 gm, approx the same as Clifton.

The heel from of FlyKnit is 10 mm, a little more than Clifton.

What makes it different is the presence of React Foam in the midsole.

The React Foam gives an extra bounce to the shoe while keeping the weight of the shoe light.   This springy action makes the shoe very reactive.

The midsole of Clifton is made using the  EVA Foam. The midsole is very soft and responsive.

Nike Epic has React Foam in the outsole area. This is very durable and gives an adequate grip.

Clifton has an outsole made with Eva Foam.

The upper of Nike Epic React FlyKnit uses the FlyKnit upper. It snugs to your foot with minimum design. The only design present is the Nike overlay. The FlyKnit upper is very comfortable and breathable.

The upper of Clifton is designed using a highly durable and breathable engineered fabric.

Epic React can be used for long-distance running at a moderate pace, marathon. It is mostly used for road or treadmill running.

Clifton is used for long-distance, road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Exceptionally bounce and highly responsive
  • Lightweight
  • Soft and comfortable FlyKnit upper
  • Durable React Foam outsole
  • Stylish
  • Available in vibrant color

 NEGATIVES

  • The React Foam outsole may not give enough traction at freezing temperatures.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

ASICS CUMULUS 22

Asics Cumulus 22 is our next alternative to Clifton 7.

It is a neutral running shoe for runners with normal arches. It can also be used by underpronated runners with high arches.

The heel drop in Cumulus is 10 mm and weighs around 7.6oz/215g, slightly lighter than Clifton.

The midsole of Cumulus is designed using the FlyteFoam Propel and FlyteFoam Midsole Technologies.  Together they make the shoe lightweight and springy. There is a layer of SpevaFoam 45 Lasting feature which adds extra bounce in each step. Cumulus has specially designed gel units under the fore-foot and under the heels.  These gel units act as shock absorbers and add comfort on landing on the ground.  There is an additional Ortholite sock-liner which adds more comfort underfoot.

The midsole of Clifton is made using the EVA foam. This makes the shoe weight light, soft, and responsive.

The outsole of Cumulus is made with AHAR rubber. It makes the shoe flexible, soft, and long-lasting.

The outsole of Clifton is mostly EVA Foam with rubber pods strategically placed for better grip and life of the shoe.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using a 3D Engineered mesh. The upper is almost seamless.  The upper gives very good support to the forefoot. The added advantage in Cumulus is the presence of the reflective material on the upper, which increases its visibility in the dim light area.

The upper of Clifton 7 is made with highly durable and breathable engineered mesh. The embroidery on the sides of the shoe locks the midfoot area.

Cumulus is mostly used for everyday training and road running.

Clifton 7 is mostly used for long/short distance running, road or treadmill running, and also for daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Lightweight.
  • Good forefoot support
  • Gel units underfoot act as shock absorbers.
  • Available in a wide range of colors

 NEGATIVES

  •  Sizing seems to be a bit off. Some runners may find it running small.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
NIKE AIR ZOOM PEGASUS 36

We have Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 next in our list.

Pegasus is the most widely used running shoes and a super favorite runner amongst runners.

It is a neutral running shoe for medium to high arch support like Clifton 7.

The weight of Pegasus falls in the same range to Clifton, however, the heel drop in 10 mm, a little more than Clifton.

The unique feature of Nike Air-Zoom Pegasus is its midsole.

It has a layer of Air-Zoom unit that runs below the sole all through the shoe. You can imagine this as a thick pillow of air below the sole. To supplement this there is an additional layer of cushion provided by the CT Foam.  This unit makes the midsole very responsive and shock absorbing.

The midsole of Clifton is designed using the EVA foam. The midsole is soft and responsive.

The outsole of Pegasus is rubber with rubber pods placed appropriately for better traction.

The outsole of Clifton is made with EVA Form with rubber pods.

The upper of Pegasus is made with the flymesh fabric. This is a soft, durable, and breathable material.  It provided foot ventilation and prevent heat accumulation. Pegasus 36 has a narrowed heel counter for better heel grip. It has a slimmer tongue and heel collar which reduces the shoe weight. The shoelace is intact using Nike’s Flywire, giving a secure and tight fit when you are running at high speed. Pegasus comes with a new aerodynamic design which enhances speed.

The upper of Clifton is designed using a light-weight and breathable engineered mesh.

Pegasus can be used for medium-paced long-distance running. It is mostly used for running on the hard surfaces – road, treadmill, and even hard surface trail.

Clifton 7  can be used for daily training, long or short distance running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with medium arches.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Good shock absroption
  • The aerodynamic design adds acceleration.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Durable
  • Well-ventilated
  • Comes in attractive colors
  • Good for runners suffering from Achilles Tendinitis and calf pain.

 NEGATIVES

  • The slimmer tongue may give lacing pressure.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

MIZUNO WAVE RIDER 23

Mizuno Wave Rider 23 is the next shoe in our list.

Wave Rider 23 is best for neutral runners but works well for runners who are slightly underpronated to slightly overpronated runners.

Clifton on the other hand is most suitable for a neutral runner.

The help drop of Wave Rider is 12mm, more than Clifton.

The weight of Wave Rider is  9.6 oz/272g approximately the same as Clifton.

The striking difference lies in the midsole design of Wave Rider.

The midsole of Wave Rider consists of U4ic and U4icX foam. The U4icX foam is present in the heel region for extra softness.  Also, a thin layer of U4icX foam runs all though the sole unit adding more softness and comfort.  The Wave Rider has the plastic Pebax wave plate which gives a firm and stable feel.

The midsole of Clifton is made with the EVA Foam for a softer and comfortable feel.

The outsole of Wave Rider is made using blown rubber. The rubber on the forefoot is softer than that of the heel. The multiple grooves present on the outsole makes the shoe flexible and ensures great comfort.

The outsole of Clifton has EVA Foam with rubber pods for better traction.

Wave Rider 23 comes with the appropriate upper than its previous version. It is light-weight and breathable.

The upper of Clifton is made using an engineered mesh and the fabric is soft, light-weight, and breathable.

The Wave Rider 23 can be used for every day running and even for long-distance running.

Clifton 6 is used for treadmill running, road or treadmill running, and daily training.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Lightweight
  • Responsive
  • Suitable for neutral runners but also support mild underpronation and mild overpronation
  • Firm feel on the sole due to the plastic Pebax wave plate
  • The upper is breathable than its previous version.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some user find the shoe to be little narrow.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

NEW BALANCE FRESH FOAM 1080 v10

The New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 V10 is our next preference.

This is a neutral running shoe much like Clifton.

The heel drop is 8mm very close to that of Clifton and weighs around 9.5 oz/269 g.

This has an updated Fresh Foam midsole and delivers enhanced softness and rebound than its previous version. The rocker shaped midsole really makes the strides faster and smoother. It has an Ortholite sock-liner for added comfort. The outer edges of the outsole and midsole is rounded to give better support in dirt and slippery surfaces.

Clifton has the midsole designed using the EVA Foam, givig it the right combination of cushioning and rebound.

The upper Fresh Foam 1080 is designed using the Engineered HYPOKNIT. This is soft and breathable and maintains the temperature of the foot. The UltraHeel design of the rear gives a more secure fit and make it more comfortable.

Clifton has upper designed using engineered mesh with embroidery on both sides giving comfort and secure fit.

Fresh Foam 1080 can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running. However, it is not very suitable fr tempo runs.

Clifton can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and comfortable
  • Lightweight
  • Good for runners with neutral pronation.
  • Secure rear foot fit due to the 3D heel design
  • The upper gives a superior fit.

 NEGATIVES

  • The toebox takes a couple of weeks to expand

We chose Altra Escalante 2.5 as the next alternative to Clifton 7.

This is also a neutral shoe same as Clifton.

It is a zero drop shoe very close to Clifton’s 5 mm heel drop.

Escalante has the midsole is designed using Altra Ego. The Altra Ego gives a good energy return and makes the shoe more responsive and durable. It also has Inner Flex to add flexibility to the shoe. The FOOTSHAPE design takes the natural design of the foot to give ultra comfort. The midsole design makes the landing very soft and the springy toe-off makes the run more energetic.

Clifton has the midsole designed using the EVA Foam.

Escalante 2.5 outsole uses the  FootPod technique to follow the construction of the human foot. This gives very good flexibility to the foot.

The outsole of Clifton is designed using the EVA Foam.

The upper of Escalante comes with an engineered knit mesh. It snugs to the foot and gives a sock-like feel. It has a PU insole for a softer feel. It uses the Dri-Lex and Dri-Freeze Heel Liner for better heat control.

The upper of Clifton is designed using highly durable and breathable fabric. The embroideries on the side of the shoe give secure locking of the midfoot.

Escalante can be used for running on roads and tracks, daily training, and also for gym training.

Clifton is used mostly for long-distance road or treadmill running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft cushion
  • Spring and adds bounce
  • Light-weight
  • Breathable
  • Manages the temperature of the sole
  • Designed for neutral runners

 NEGATIVES

The Saucony Kinvara 11 is our next preference for Hoka One One Clifton.

It is a light-weight neutral running shoe.

The weight of Kinvara is very close to Clifton.

Even the heel drop is 4mm closest to the 5 mm heel drop of Clifton.

The PWRRUN  midsole of Kinvara gives a soft cushioning and responsiveness.

Clifton too has a soft and responsive cushioning owing to the EVA foam midsole.

The outsole of Kinvara uses high abrasion rubber for a more durable outsole.

The outsole of Clifton is mostly EVA Foam with rubber pods placed strategically for better shoe-life and traction.

Kinvara has an upper designed using the  FORMFIT technology to give a customized fit. The Engineered Mesh used in the upper is very breathable. It has a padded tongue and collar to give more stability.

Clifton has an upper designed using a highly breathable and durable engineered mesh.

Kinvara can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running.

Clifton can be used for long-distance running, road or treadmill running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and comfortable
  • Responsive
  • Breathable fabric
  • Upper of the shoe gives a customized fit
  • Stylish look

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off.

Nike Zoom  Pegasus Turbo 2 is our next alternative to Clifton 7.

It is a light-weight super reactive shoe.

This shoe is well-suited for the neutral runners, similar to Clifton.

The weight of Turbo 2 is around 7.2 oz/204 g, which is slightly lesser than that of Clifton.

The heel drop of Turbo 2 is 10 mm, more than that of Clifton.

The most significant feature is the midsole design of Turbo 2.

It uses the ZoomX foam on top of a layer of React Foam. The ZoomX foam is the lightest and most energy-efficient foam that Nike has ever made. As per Nike, ZoomX gives you the energy return as much as 85%. The ZoomX and React Foam together make Turbo 2 very bouncy and energy-efficient. The angled heel design optimizes the initial touchdown and makes a smooth transition.

The midsole of Clifton is of EVA Foam.

The outsole of Turbo 2 has the layer of the React Foam with rubber. The rubber patches are present under the heel and toe region and a thin strip of rubber running along the sides of the sole. The rubber adds to the grip and gives good traction on wet surfaces.

The outsole of Clifton is made using the EVA foam to add flexibility and durability.

The upper of Turbo2 is made with a very thin fabric. The pores on the fabric make the shoe more breathable. The lacing system is simplified as the Flywire has been removed and just uses the regular laces. The only padding present here is at the sides of the heel collar.

The upper of Clifton is made with a light-weight and soft engineered mesh.

Turbo 2 can be used to run long-distance running, marathon running, and daily training. It is very suited to run on the road, treadmill, or tracks.

Clifton 7 can be used for long-distance running, road, or treadmill running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Maximum energy return
  • Better traction
  • Lightweight.
  • Breathable and light upper
  • Available in attractive colors

 NEGATIVES

  • Upper could have been little thicker.

FAQs

Is Hoka Clifton good for plantar fasciitis?

No Hoka One One Clifton is not the right shoes for Plantar Fasciitis.

Which is better Hoka Clifton or Bondi?

Well, Hoka’s Clifton and Bondi are two different shoes each having their individual features.

Clifton comes in the line with balanced cushioning. It is soft, cushioned, and at the same time responsive and shock absorption.

Bondi has a thick cushion and delivers the ultra-plush ride. 

So it mostly depends on the user’s preference and requirements.

You can see here for a detailed comparison between Clifton and Bondi.

 

Which Hoka shoes have the most cushion?

Bondi is the best-cushioned shoe offered by Hoka. In fact, it is referred to as “mega cushioned” shoe. There is a thick layer of EVA foam cushioning that delivers the ultra-plush ride to the runners.

Is Hoka Clifton good for bad knees?

Clifton is a balanced running shoe. It is lightweight, cushioned, responsive, and gives great shock absorption. 

The shock absorption reduces the impact of running.

The minimal impact of running makes it easy on the bad knees.

So, yes Clifton is definitely a very good option if you have a bad knee.

What kind of a running shoe is Hoka Clifton?

Clifton is one of the most popular shoes from Hoka One One. 

It is a light-weight neutral running shoe. This is well suited for runners with medium to high arches. 

It comes with a low drop.

The shoe is designed to offer ultimate softness and comfort, maximum shock absorption, and keeping the response of the shoe high.  The maximum shock absorption reduces the impact of running and the response increases the running efficiency. 

The versatility of the shoe comes from the fact that it can be used for long-distance, short-distance, high or low pace running.

Will Hoka Clifton help me with my Achilles Tendonitis?

The Clifton has a low heel drop, 5 mm. The low drop does not make it very suitable for Achilles Tendinitis. For Achilles Tendinitis it is more suitable to opt for shoes that have a heel drop more than 8mm.

Is Hoka Clifton better than Brooks Ghost?

This is again a debatable topic. 

Each of these shoes has its own unique feature. 

Clifton is a lightweight, well-cushioned, responsive, and shock absorption. 

Ghost on the other hand has a very soft and protective cushioning. The segmented scratch-pad under the forefoot adds to better shock absorption and flexibility of the shoe.

So it becomes very difficult to pick a direct winner amongst Clifton and Ghost. 

It is ultimately the runner’s choice and the experience that matters when you are comparing two equally awesome running shoes.

 

 

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Here are the alternatives of Hoka One One Clifton. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Clifton. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Here are the alternatives of Hoka One One Clifton. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Clifton. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Related Posts

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

Top 10 Best Adidas Solarboost Alternatives That Are Most Suited For You [2020]

Top 10 Best Adidas Solarboost Alternatives That Are Most Suited For You [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

Adidas Solarboost is one of the most preferred running shoes. It is light-weight, cushioned, and responsive, the most needed features in a running shoe. Adidas Solarboost is designed for neutral runners. Another variant of Solarboost, the Adidas Solarboost ST is specifically designed for overpronation.

To find the alternatives for Solarboost, out baseline version in Adidas Solarboost 19.

The Best Adidas Solar Boost 19 Alternative

Last update on 2020-10-27 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes the same as Solarboost.
  • 10 mm drop which is the same as Solarboost.
  • Very thick cushioning
  • Both can be used for road and treadmill running.

Let’s understand Adidas Solar Boost

Before we take a dive into the various alternatives for Adidas Solarboost 19, let us first take a moment to understand Solarboost.

Solarboost is a perfect combination of cushioned and responsive running shoes.

This is essentially designed for neutral runners. Its other version on Solarboost ST is more of a stability shoe and designed for overpronated runners.

The shoe weight is 11oz/ 312g and the heel drop is 10 mm.

The midsole of the Solarboost is made with a thick layer of Boost. The softness and bounce in the shoe is owing to the Boost midsole. It also features the Torsion system and Guide Rails. The GuideRails running across the edges of the shoe. The Guide Rail reduces the lateral motion of the foot and adds to the stability of the feet.

The outsole of the shoe is made with the Continental rubber. This outsole has extremely good traction support even on the wet surfaces. The stretch web pattern present makes the shoe very flexible.

The upper of the Solarboost is designed using the engineered mesh and bears a NASA inspired design.  The shoe has extremely good breathability.

Solarboost is a versatile shoe and can be used for running, training, cross-training, and indoor and outdoor sports. It can be used for running on surfaces like road, treadmill, and tracks. The cushioned and springy midsole makes it suitable to run for long-distance and you can try both high speed and medium speed running.

Running shoes similar to Adidas Solar Boost – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
BROOKS GLYCERIN 18

Brooks Glycerin 18 is our first choice for Adidas Solarboost.

They both are neutral running shoes having the same heel drop, 10mm.

Brooks Glycerin 18 weighs approx. 9oz/255.1g which is slightly lighter than the Solarboost.se

The main difference lies in the cushioning of these shoes.

The midsole of Glycerin 18 uses DNA LOFT. This gives extra soft cushioning and plush ride.  Brooks’s Omega Flex Grooves in the midsole improves the responsiveness and flexibility of the shoes. The presence of Ortholite sock-liner is the cherry on the cake.

The midsole of Solarboost has Boost midsole. This makes the shoe well-cushioned and gives high energy return. The Torsion system and Guide rails gives better stability of the foot.

The outsole of Glycerin uses blown rubber on the forefoot and HRR rubber, a high abrasive rubber, on the heel.  This combination of rubber used on the outsole keeps the shoe-weight light without compromising on the flexibility, durability, and traction of the shoes.

The outsole of Solarboost is designed using Continental rubber and shows a stretch-web pattern. This makes Solarboost highly durable and flexible.

The upper of Brooks Glycerin comes with an updated double jacquard mesh to make the fit more flexible and breathable. It uses 3D Print technology to give for a seamless and secure fit.

Solarboost uses an engineered mesh on its upper and gives very good breathability to the shoes.

Brooks Glycerin can be used for running long and short distances. It can be used for road and treadmill running.

Solarboost can be used for running the long and short distances, cross-training, and other sports. It can be used for surfaces like road, treadmill, and tracks.

 

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultimate cushioning
  • Lightweight
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Comes with Ortholite sock liner
  • Responsive

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off. Order .1/2 size bigger if you are keen on wearing a thicker socks
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)

ADIDAS ULTRABOOST 20

Adidas UltraBoost 20 is our next match for Solarboost.

Both these shoes are from Adidas boost line of shoes and have very much in common.

They both are light-weight, incredibly soft, and responsive running shoes.

Both are neutral running shoes weighing around 11oz/312g and heel drop 10 mm.

They both have the Boost midsole. The Boost is like a small capsule capable of returning energy. This makes the shoe more responsive and enhances performance.

Apart from the boost midsole, Solarboost has an additional Guide rail that reduces the lateral movement of the foot.

Both have the same outsole made with Continental rubber and have a stretch-web pattern. The outsole is perfect for adequate traction and flexibility.

The upper of UltraBoost is made with the PrimeKnit + material.  The upper snugs like a sock giving a more customized and secure fit. The upper is almost seamless which makes it comfortable to wear the shoe.

The upper of Solarboost uses an engineered mesh and has a NASA inspired design.  The material of the upper is capable of keeping the foot ventilated.

The usability of both UltraBoost and Solarboost is very versatile. They can be used for long or short distance running. You can try a high-speed tempo or a medium speed long run with it. They both can handle running on road, treadmill or tracks. They can also be used for cross-training, gym wear, indoor or outdoor sports. In fact, they can be used for wearing the whole day.

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultimate cushioning
  • Highly responsive.
  • Good for runners with normal arches.
  • neutral running shoe
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Available in 27 attractive colors
  • Good traction on dry and wet surfaces
  • Multipurpose running shoe

 NEGATIVES

  • The toe box may be a bit low for some runners.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

ASICS GEL NIMBUS -22

The next shoe that we have on our list is the Asics Gel Nimbus 22.

Asics Gel Nimbus is also a neutral running shoe for runners having a medium arch.

The heel drop of Nimbus is 10 mm and it weighs around 10.9 oz/ 309 g, same as that of Solarboost.

The midsole of Nimbus has a Gel-based cushioning. There is an additional layer of FLYTEFOAM cushion. The double layer of cushioning makes the shoe very soft, shock-absorbing, and flexible.

The midsole of Solarboos has a Boost midsole.  The boost midsole is capable of returning energy back. This makes the shoe very responsive and enhances performance. It also has the guide rails running around the edges of the shoe. These guide rails reduce the lateral movement of the foot upon landing and maintain foot stability.

The outsole of  Nimbus is made with AHAR rubber. The deep grooves design on the outsole. This gives stability and smooth ride and heel to toe transition.

Solarboost has a Continental rubber outsole with a stretch-web pattern.  This traction support is very good in the dry and wet areas. The stretch-web pattern adds to the flexibility of the shoe.

The upper of Nimbus is made with an engineered mesh. The fabric is soft, flexible, and gives a secure fit.

The TRRUSTIC technology used under the arch of the shoe makes the shoe more durable and stable.

The upper of Solarboos is made with an engineered mesh and has a NASA inspired design. The fabric of the shoe shows high breathability.

Nimbus is mostly used for long-distance running and can also be used for trail running.

Solarboost on the other hand is a versatile shoe and can be used for long or short distances and also on various surfaces like road, treadmill, or tracks. This can also be used for gym and other sports.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Light-weight
  • Very good cushioning and shock absorption.
  • Stylish
  • Good for road and trail running.

 NEGATIVES

  • The shoe upper could have been slight;y thicker.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

BROOKS GHOST 13

Our next well-suited alternative is the Brooks Ghost 13.

Brooks Ghost 13 is a light-weight running shoe with super soft cushioning along with flexibility and springy action, something which is expected out of a running shoe.

Ghost is a neutral running shoe for runners with medium to high arches, just like Solarboost.

The heel drop is 12 mm which is very close to that of Solarboost’s 10mm heel drop.

The weight of Ghost 13 is 8.8oz/294.5g slightly lesser than Solarboost.

The midsole of Ghost 13 has BioMogo DNA and DNA Loft cushioning.  Together they give very protective and soft cushion without losing responsiveness and durability. In Ghost 13, DNA Loft is extended from the heel right up to the forefoot. This gives an easy transition from landing to toe-off.

In Solarboost, the midsole is a thick layer of Boost. Boost gives high energy return, shock absorption, and soft cushion under the foot. The presence of the Torsion system and Guide rails maintains the stability of the foot upon landing.

The outsole of Ghost is made with blown rubber. It uses the Segmented Crash-pad pattern on the forefoot gives maximum shock- absorption and maintains the stability of the foot. It provides an easy heel to toe transition.

The outsole of Solarboost is made with the Continental rubber and demonstrates a stretch-web pattern.  The design of the outsole maximizes the durability of the shoe and improves grip especially on the wet surfaces.

The upper of Ghost 13 is designed using an Engineered Air Mesh.  This gives a secure fit and keeps the breathability of the shoe.  The 3D Print technology used on the upper gives a personalized fit.

The upper of Solarboost uses design inspired by NASA and uses the engineered mesh making the shoe comfortable and breathable.

Ghost is mostly used for long-distance running across surfaces like road and treadmill.  It can also be used for cross-training.

Solarboost is a multipurpose shoe. Along with running, it can be used for cross-training, sports, and gym.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and protective cushioning
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Lightweight.
  • Designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Available in many shades
  • Can be used for walking

 NEGATIVES

  •  Sizing seems to be a bit off.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

HOKA ONE ONE BONDI 6

The next shoe that we have on our list is the Hoka One One Bondi 6.

Bondi 6 falls in the category of running shoe having plush cushioning designed for ultra-soft experience.

It is a neutral running shoe the same as SolarBoost.

The weight of Bondi is very much the same as SolarBoost, but the heel drop is very different.  Bondi has a heel drop  4 mm whereas the heel drop of SolarBoost is 10mm.

The main difference lies in there cushioning.

Hoka Bondi is the most cushioned shoe from Hoka. Bondi uses compressed EVA Foam in the midsole.  This gives a supremely plush feel and excellent shock absorption at the same time keeps a tab on the shoe weight.  The early-stage meta-rocker design geometry used in these shoes gives a rocking motion to the feet and drives it forward. This gives better running efficiency.

SolarBoost comes with a Boost midsole along with Torsion system and Guide rails.  This gives a springy like motion and shock-absorption.

The outsole of Bondi 6 is made with blown rubber present at the most impacted areas, generally under the forefeet and heels. It has a groove pattern outsole which adds to the shoe flexibility.

SolarBoost has a Continental rubber outsole and bears a stretch web pattern.

The upper of Bondi is made with an engineered mesh. The fabric used here is premium and making the shoe very comfortable and breathable. The toe-box has ample of space.  The heel counter locks in the back of the foot giving a secure fit.

The upper of SolarBoost is designed using an engineered mesh.  It is very comfortable and breathable.

Bondi 6 can be used for long-distance running on surfaces like road and treadmill.

SolarBoost can be used for running long or short distance running at high speed or moderate. It can be used for running on road, treadmill to tracks. It can also be used for cross-training, gym, and sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • Supremely plush cushioning
  • Good for runners with low to medium arches.
  • Good for neutral runners 
  • Lightweight.

 NEGATIVES

  • The upper could have been more sturdy
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

ALTRA TROIN 4.5 PLUSH

The Torin 4.5 Plush belongs to the Altra Premium line of running shoes.

The name itself says “Plush”, which gives the feel of supremely soft cushion when you run in them.

They are designed for a neutral runner with high arches, the same as Solarboost.

The weight of Torin is 10.1oz/286 g, slightly less than Solarboost.

The Torin 4.5 is a zero drop shoe (heel to toe drop is 0-4mm). This is very different from Solarboost that has a 10 mm heel drop.

As a zero drop  shoe, Torin has the heel and toe very much at the same level from the ground. This gives the low-impact while running. It also makes Troin a good running shoe for trail running.

Torin 4.5 Plush uses the Quantic midsole.  The material gives the ultimate cushioning and rebound, at the same time it keeps a tab on the shoe weight. As a result the ride comfortable and bouncy.  The presence of Perf-X insole adds t the cushioning and underfoot experience.

The Solarboost has a Boost midsole that is capable of giving a good energy return and maximizing the shock absorption.  The result is a comfortable ride and improved performance.

The upper of Torin 4.5 Plush is designed using engineered knit. There is sufficient space at the forefoot. The wider space at the toe-box makes it very suitable for running uphill or downhill.

The upper of SolarBoost is designed using engineered mesh. The upper bears a NASA inspired design. The fabric is soft, light-weight, and breathable.

Torin uses the unique FOOTPOD technology in its outsole. This technology follows the natural construction of the foot and moves and bends accordingly.

The outsole of SolarBoost is made using the Continental rubber and shows a stretch-web pattern.

Torin 4.5 Plush is a great choice for long-distance running and trail running.

SolarBoost can be used for long or short distance running on surfaces like road, treadmill, or tracks. It can also be used for cross-training, gym and sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultra-plush cushioning
  • Responsive
  • Lightweight.
  • Ample room space for forefeet, well suited for wide feet runner.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Good for long-distance running as well as for trail running.

 NEGATIVES

  • The extra soft midsole may not be very supportive for heavy runners. 
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)

Altra Escalante 2.5-min

Altra Escalante 2.5 is out next candidate for SolarBoost alternative.

This is also a neutral running shoe as Solarboost.

This is a zero drop shoe unlike the 10 mm heel drop of Solarboost.

The midsole of Escalante is designed using the Altra Ego and Inner Flex.  The Altra Ego gives a high energy return and makes the shoe responsive and durable. The Inner Flex adds to the flexibility of the shoe. This combination makes the landing very soft and springy take-off of the toe, thus increasing the running efficiency.  The midsole also uses the FOOTSHAPE technology which takes the natural shape of the human foot making the run very personalized and comfortable.

SolaBoost has Boost midsole accompanied with Guide rails and torsion system. Together they make the run comfortable, springy, and stable.

The outsole of Escalante uses FOOTPOD technology. This technique makes the shoe capable to follow the design of the foot.  This makes the ride flexible and responsive.

The outsole of SolarBoost is designed using the Continental rubber and shows a stretch web pattern.

The upper of Escalante is made with an engineered knit mesh that snugs to the foot giving a sock-like feel. It also has PU Insole to add to the comfort and give a plush feel in every step.  The Dri-Lex and Dri-Freeze Heel Liner are present to give a proper heat control to the foot and maintain the temperature inside the shoe.

The upper of Solarboost is designed using an engineered mesh and has a NASA inspired design. The breathability of the shoe upper is outstanding.

The Altra Escalante can be used for running on roads, tracks, and also for cross-training and gym wear.

SolarBoost is a perfect example of a multipurpose shoe. You can try running high-speed or moderate pace and be it long distance or short, SolarBoost serves all.  Running can be done on a road, track, or treadmill.  Other than that Solarboost can be used for cross-training, gym, and other sports too.

+ POSITIVES

  • Cushioned and comfortable
  • Bouncy
  • Good for the neutral runner
  • High breathability
  • Heat control of the sole

 NEGATIVES

Hoka One One Rincon 6 is our next alternative.

This is also a neutral running shoe like Adidas Solarboost.

The heel drop is 5 mm and the weight is 8 oz, lesser than that of SolarBoost.

The midsole is designed using the compressed EVA Foam cushioning.  This gives Hoka  Rincon a balanced cushioning. This makes the midsole light-weight and gives a soft feel to the foot. The early-staged meta rocker geometry design makes smooth and fast heel-strike to toe-off motion.

The midsole of SolarBoost has Boost full shoe length. This along with the Torsion system and Guide rails makes the shoe comfy, soft, bouncy, and foot stability.

The outsole of Rincon has high abrasion rubber present on the most impacted areas i.e under the front foot and heels. Using the rubber strategically reduces the weight of the shoe.

The outsole of SolarBoost is made up of Continental rubber and demonstrates a stretch web pattern.

The upper of Rincon is made with a light-weight single-layered mesh. This provides high breathability.

The upper of SolarBoost is made using the engineered mesh and gives high breathability.

Rincon can be used for road running. The high cushioning makes it suitable for both long and short distance running.

SolarBoost is multipurpose that can be used for running across different distances and across various surfaces. It can also be used for gym, cross-training and sports.

+ POSITIVES

  • Highly cushioned and comfortable
  • Responsive
  • Good for the neutral runner
  • Lightweight
  • High breathability

 NEGATIVES

  • The shoe may be slightly tight for wide-foot runners

Nike Air Zoom Vomero 14 is our next alternative.

This is a neutral running shoe with a heel drop 10 mm the same as that of Adidas SolarBoost.

The weight of Vomero falls in the same range as that of SolarBoost.

The midsole is designed for an ultra-plush ride with greater responsiveness to the shoe. It has a full-length Nike’s Zoom unit running from heel to toe. The zoom unit along and the React technology together guarantees a soft, smooth, and snappy ride.

The midsole of SolarBoost is designed using a thick layer of Boost. The softness and bounce in the shoe are owing to the Boost midsole. It also features the Torsion system and Guide Rails.

The outsole of Vomero uses hard carbon in the entire outsole reason that gives improved traction.

The outsole of Solarboost is made up of Continental rubber and show a stretch-web pattern and gives very good flexibility and traction to the shoe.

The upper of Vomero is made with a sleek engineered mesh designed for longer durability and support. The Dynamic Fit technology used here combines with Flywire and soft foam to give better support to the midfoot. The forefoot space is very roomy and even has wider toe-box. The heel collar comes with foam pods which gives better support to the rear foot.

The upper of SolarBoost is designed using the engineered mesh and has a  NASA inspired design. It is designed for better breathability.

The Vomero 14 is mostly used for running on road or treadmill. You can run in these at a varied pace and can be used for short to moderate distance running.

The Adidas SolarBoost can be used for running, training, cross-training, and sports.

 

 

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Ultra-plush
  • Responsive
  • Soft upper
  • Good grip
  • Wide toe box.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing may be a bit off.

Adidas Solar Glide 19 is our next alternative for Adidas SolarBoost.

The Solar Glide is designed for neutral runners for high arches, the same as SolarBoost.

It weighs around 283g slightly less that SolarBoost.

The heel drop is 10 mm the same as SolarBoost.

The midsole of Solar Glide is very much similar to that of SolarBoost.

Solar Glide has a full-length Boost midsole which gives better energy return and shock absorption, same as SolarBoost. Both these shoes use a Torsion system for more flexibility and easy heel to toe transition.  Solar Glide uses the Solar Propulsion Rail whereas SolarBoost use the Guide rail for providing a stable run.

Even the outsole of Solar Glide and SolarBoost uses Continental rubber and has the stretch web pattern running through the outsole. This gives better durability and traction.

The upper of Solar Glide is made with an engineered mesh and is highly breathable and flexible. This has a Haptic print overlay for lateral support.

the upper of SolarBoost is made with an engineered mesh and gives high breathability. It also bears a NASA inspired design.

Both SolarBoost and Solar Glide can be used for road and treadmill running. They can be used daily training, and long and short distances running. SolarBoost can also be used for cross-training, gym, and other sports.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Balanced cushioning
  • Good energy return
  • Lightweight.
  • Very durable.
  • Traction support for wet and dry surfaces
  • Available in attractive colors.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some runner may find lack of heel support.

FAQs

What is the difference between Adidas SolarBoost and UltraBoost?

Adidas SolarBoost and Ultraboost belong to the Boost line of shoes from Adidas.

The midsole and outsole wise they both are pretty much the same.  SolarBoost has additional Guide rails in the midfoot for the controlled movement of the foot.

The upper of these shoes are however different.

You can get more differences between them from here.

What is the difference between Adidas SolarBoost and Solar Glide?

Both SolarBoost and Solar Glide have the same midsole and outsole.

However, the upper of these shoes are different.

You can get more details about their differences here.

Are Adidas Solar Boost good for running?

Yes, Adidas SolarBoost is an excellent running shoe.

It is light-weight and well cushioned to provide the utmost softness and comfort.

This boost midsole gives good bounce and maximum shock absorptions.

Overall it improves your running performance and gives better results.

 

What are the best Adidas running shoes?

Some of the best running shoes from Adidas are:

  • Adidas Ultraboost 20
  • Adidas SolarBoost 19
  • Adidas SolarBoost ST 19 (stability shoe)
  • Adidas Solar Glide 18
  • Adidas Adizero Boston 8
  • Adidas  SL 20

 

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Here are the alternatives of Adidas Solarboost. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Solarboost. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Here are the alternatives of Adidas Solarboost. These running shoes will provide you all the comfort you need and they are truely comparable to Solarboost. Use these running shoes for your long runs and shorter one and be always comfortable. #runningshoes #runninggears #marathon #halfmarathon #runningtips #running #runners #run #10K #5K

Related Posts

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

The Top 10 Best ASICS Cumulus Alternatives You Can Safely Try in 2020

The Top 10 Best ASICS Cumulus Alternatives You Can Safely Try in 2020

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

Asics Cumulus is a light-weight, well-cushioned, and responsive running shoes. These running shoes are for neutral to underpronation runners, with normal to high arches.

Today we shall look into the alternative of Asics Cumulus. For the comparison, we shall baseline Asics Cumulus 22.

Let us look into the alternatives of Asics Cumulus 22.

The Best Asics Cumulus Alternative

Last update on 2020-10-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoe as Asics Cumulus.
  • 12 mm drop which is the closest to 10 mm Cumulus.
  • Weight matches to that of Cumulus
  • Very good shock-absorption

Let’s understand Asics Cumulus

We are looking at the alternative for Asics Cumulus. But let us first know the Asics Cumulus design. 

It is very important to know Cumulus first because unless you are not aware of its design features, you will certainly not able to select the right alternate shoes. 

Asics Cumulus 22 is a light-weight, soft, and responsive running shoes. 

It is designed for neutral runners with normal arches. However, even uderpronated runners with high arches. 

The heel to toe drop is 10mm and weighs approx  7.6oz/215g.

The midsole consists of a unique combination of FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology. Together they giver supersoft cushioning and adds bounce in each stride. The SpevaFoam 45 Lasting features which run at 45 degrees and give additional bounce. The Rearfoot and Forefoot Gel-based system acts as shock absorbers and reduces the pressure. This makes the strike more comfortable. The removable Ortholite sock-liner is also present which gives additional cushioning and underfoot support. It also uses I.G.S technology for improved gait management.

The outsole consisting of AHAR rubber for softer and flexible ride and more durability of the shoes.

The upper of the shoes are designed using a 3D Engineered mesh.  This gives very good forefoot support and comfort. The upper is almost seamless. It also comes with a special reflective material design which increases visibility in the low -light area.

The Asics Cumulus 22 is great for everyday training and road running. It can however not be very comfortable when you are running long distances.

 

Running shoes similar to Asics Cumulus – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)
SAUCONY COHESION 13

Saucony Cohesion 13 is our first preference for Asics Cumulus 22.

This is a neutral running shoe the same as Cumulus.

It is slightly heavier than Cumulus, but the difference is will not make any difference in your performance.

The heel drop of Cohesion in 12mm, very close to that of Cumulus.

Cohesion 13 comes with the VERSARUN cushion in the midsole. It serves as a good shock absorber and reduces pressure.

Cumulus comes with a super soft and springy cushioning. It uses a combination of FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology in the midsole. The Spevafoam 45 lasting feature adds extra bounce. There is additional gen units present in the ForeFoot and RearFoot for shock absorption.

The outsole of Cohesion uses high abrasion rubber for better durability and traction. The segmented outsole gives better comfort.

The outsole of Cumulus uses the AHAR rubber and adds to the flexibility and durability of the shoes.

Cohesion has a breathable upper and gives a secure and comfortable fit.  The padded tongue and collar give better stability.

The upper of the shoes are designed using a 3D Engineered mesh. The special reflective design on the shoe increases the visibility in the low-light area.

Cohesion can be used for moderate mileage run for road or treadmill.

Cumulus is also preferred for road running and everyday training.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Good cushioning
  • Springy action
  • good for neutral runners
  • Lightweight.
  • Good traction support

 NEGATIVES

  • Some runner may find the shoe to be narrow at the front
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)

Saucony Ride ISO 2-min

Saucony Ride ISO 2 is our next alternative Asics Cumulus 22.

This is a neutral running shoe for runners with medium arches. It can also be used for underpronation. This is similar to that of Cumulus.

Ride ISO 2 weighs approx. 9.8 oz/278 gm and has a heel to toe drop 8 mm.

The weight and heel drop of Ride ISO is little more than that of Cumulus, but this really is not a very significant difference.

Saucony Ride ISO 2 has PWRFOAM midsole and EVERUN topsole. Together they give good shock absorption, cushioning, and comfort.

Even, Asics Cumulus has a midsole designed with a combination of FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology. Along with it, it has SpevaFoam 45 Lasting features which run at 45 degrees. They provide good cushion and makes the shoe super soft and adds bounce to your stride.  The gel units present under the heel and forefoot gives shock absorption.

The outsole of Ride ISO 2 has Carbon rubber with translucent crystal rubber under the forefoot.

The outsole of Cumulus has AHAR rubber.  It makes the shoe very flexible and durable.

The upper of Saucony Ride ISO 2 uses ISOFIT and FORMFIT technologies. This makes the shoe take the shape and motion of the runner’s foot, giving customized fit. The engineered mesh makes the shoes breathable and lightweight.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using 3D engineered mesh. The upper is almost seamless making the shoe very comfortable. It also comes with a special reflective material design which increases visibility in the low -light area.

Ride ISO 2 can be used for running on the road, treadmill, trail. They can be used for running long-distance.

The Asics Cumulus 22 is great for everyday training and road running. It can however not be very comfortable for long-distance running.

 

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsiveness.
  • Can be used for neutral to underpronation.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Good for runners suffering from Achilles Tendinitis.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some runners felt that cushioning could have been better
  • Some runners have felt hot spots at the midfoot.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
HOKA ONE ONE CLIFTON 6

Hoka One One Clifton 6 is the next alternate shoe for Asics Cumulus 22.

Clifton 6 gives you a perfect combination of plush and responsiveness, a balanced running shoe.

It is a neutral running shoe designed for normal arches, the same as Cumulus.

Weight-wise Clifton 6 falls into the same range as that of Cumulus.

The heel to toe drop in Clifton is 5 mm, lesser than that of Cumulus.

The midsole of Clifton 6 is designed using the EVAFOAM, which gives the balanced cushioning making the shoe soft and responsive.

The early-stage meta-rocker technology used in Clifton 6 makes the forefoot transition very quick and gives a smooth ride and momentum.

The midsole of Cumulus is designed for cushioning and adding bounce. It uses the FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology.  The SpevaFoam 45 feature adds more bounce. The gel units at the Rearfoot and Forefoot act as shock absorbers and reduces the pressure. The removable Ortholite sock-liner is also present which gives additional cushioning and underfoot support.

The outsole of Clifton 6 is made up of the EVA foam and has high-abrasion rubber pods placed strategically to minimize the wear and tear of the shoes. It also adds to a better grip.

Cumulus has the outsole with AHAR rubber. It makes the shoe flexible, soft, durable, and better traction.

The upper of  Clifton 6 is made with engineered mesh. the fabric is very durable and breathable. The embroidery on the sides of the shoes gives a better lock-down of the midfoot. It comes with a wider toe-box.

Clifton 6 is a multi-purpose running shoe. It can be used for daily training, long or short distance running.

Cumulus is used for road running.

+ POSITIVES

 

  • Perfect balance of cushioning and reponsiveness
  • Good for neutral runners with medium arches.
  • Wider toe box.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Durable
  • Breathable
  • Shoe design adds momentum 

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems a bit odd.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
SAUCONY TRIUMPH 17

Saucony Triumph 17 is another great alternative to Asics Cumulus 22.

Triumph 17 is a neutral running shoes the same as Cumulus.

The heel drop of Triumph is 8mm, very close to that of Cumulus and weighs around 10.7 oz/305g, slightly more than that of Cumulus.

The midsole of Triumph is made from the  PWRFLEX+. The lightest and most responsive foam from Saucony. It has the “FORMFIT” insole. The insole and midsole make the shoes well-cushioned and highly responsive.

The midsole of Asics uses the combination of FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology.  The SpevaFoam 45 Lasting features which run at 45 degrees. The midsole material makes the shoe very soft and adds bounce. The  Gel-based unit present under forefoot and heel acts as shock absorbers. This makes the strike more comfortable. The removable Ortholite sock-liner is also present which gives additional cushioning and underfoot support.

Triumph has a combination of blown rubber and sticky rubber in the outsole. This sticky rubber is present under the big toe and the heel. This enhances the grip of the shoe especially if you are running on the wet surface.

The  AHAR rubber present in the outsole of Cumulus gives a softer and flexible ride and increases the durability of the shoes.

Triumph 17 is soft and sturdy upper. The tongue and heel counter are well-cushioned. The extra plush in the heel counter is extremely helpful if you suffer from Achilles Tendinitis.

The upper of Cumulus the shoes are designed using a 3D Engineered mesh. The fabric comes is seamless. It also comes with a special reflective material design which increases visibility in the low -light area.

Triumph 17 is designed for long-distance running. It can be used for road, treadmill, or trail running. They have good outsole support for running on wet surfaces. The cushioning in these shoes reduces the running hangover and gives a faster recovery.

Cumulus can be used for road running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and cushy
  • Responsive
  • Good for neutral runners 
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Reduces running hangover
  • Reduces running recovery
  • Can be used for running on wet surfaces
  • Good for runners suffering from Achilles Tendinitis

 NEGATIVES

  • Runners with wide forefoot may find the toe box compact
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
Altra Escalante 2.5-min

Altra Escalante 2.5 is our next alternative for Asics Cumulus 22.

This is neutral running shoes the same as Cumulus.

However, this is a zero drop shoe whereas Cumulus has a heel drop 10 mm.

The midsole of Escalante is designed for a cushioned feel and gives a good bounce. It is designed using Altra Ego which gives a good energy return and makes the shoe more responsive and durable. It also has Inner Flex which adds to the flexibility of the shoe. The FOOTSHAPE design takes the natural design of the foot giving utmost comfort. The midsole design makes the landing very soft and the springy toe-off makes the run more energetic.

The midsole of Cumulus has come with soft cushioning and bounce owing to FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology. The Spevafoam 45 Lasting feature adds more bounce. The gel units present under forefoot and heel give shock absorption and thereby reducing the pressure. It also has the removable Ortholite sock-liner is also present which gives additional cushioning and underfoot support.

The Escalante 2.5 has a  FootPod Outsole design which follows the construction of the human foot. This is designed for better flexibility and comfort.

The outsole of Cumulus is designed using the AHAR rubber for a softer and flexible ride and more durability of the shoes.

The upper of Escalante 2.5 comes with the Engineered Knit Mesh to give a more sock-like feel. It is very breathable and sleek. The decoupled heel design uses minimum construction for a fast feel. The PFS Performance Last snugs on the foot and gives a high-performance feel. Additionally, it has a PU insole for a softer feel. It uses the Dri-Lex and Dri-Freeze Heel Liner for better heat control.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using a 3D Engineered mesh.  This gives very good forefoot support and comfort.  It also comes with a special reflective material design which increases visibility in the low -light area.

+ POSITIVES

  • Very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsive shoes
  • Designed for neutral runners
  • Lightweight.
  • Smooth heel to toe transition
  • Wider toe-box

 NEGATIVES

 

 

Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
SAUCONY KINVARA 11

Saucony Kinvara 11 is also a good alternative to Asics Cumulus 22.

It is a lightweight neutral running shoe.

It weighs very close to that of Cumulus.

However, the heel drop is 4 mm, much lesser than that of Cumulus.

The midsole of Kinvara has a PWRRUN cushioning. It gives a soft cushion and makes the shoe more responsive.

The midsole of Cumulus also has a good cushioning and adds bounce with each stride. It uses the FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology and additionally SpevaFoam 45 lasting feature.  The presence of an Ortholite sock-liner adds additional comfort and plush. The Rearfoot and Forefoot Gel-based system acts as shock absorbers.

The outsole of Kinvara uses the high abrasion rubber for a more durable outsole. The sole is very flexible for a quick transition.

The outsole of Cumulus is made with AHAR rubber which giver more durability and flexibility.

Kinvara has a FORMFIT upper which gives you a more customized fit. The Engineered Mesh used is very breathable. The padded tongue and collar add to better stability.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using 3D Engineered mesh for forefoot support and comfort. It also has a special reflective material design for better visibility in the low -light areas.

The Kinvara can be used for long-distance running , road running and treadmill running.

Cumulus is mostly used for everyday training and road running. It can however not be very comfortable when you are running long distances.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Good cushioning
  • Responsive
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Breathable and soft upper which gives a customized fit.
  • Comes in attractive colors
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems a bit odd.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
ADIDAS ULTRABOOST 20

Adidas UltraBoost 20 is another good alternative to Asics Cumulus.

It is a neutral running shoe with normal arches the same as Cumulus.

The heel drop is also 10 mm, the same as Cumulus.

UltraBoost 20 is slightly heavier than Cumulus, weighing around 10.9 oz/ 310. But this weight difference is not that significant to impact your performance.

UltraBoost has Boost midsole running all through the shoe. Boosts are small capsules that return energy back.  The Boost midsole gives ultimate cushioning  and shock absorption and make the shoe very responsive. The UltraBoost 20 comes with 20% more Boost than the previous version.

The midsole of Cumulus uses the FlyteFoam Midsole Technology and FlyteFoam Propel Technology for cushioning and bounce.  The SpevaFoam 45 Lasting features also add additional bounce to the shoe. The underfoot gel units present at forefoot and heel acts as shock absorbers and releases the pressure.

The outsole of Adidas UltraBoost is made with the Continental Rubber. The stretch-web pattern on the outsole gives a better grip on wet surfaces.

The outsole of Cumulus id made with the AHAR rubber and gives good flexibility and traction.

The upper of Ultraboost e is made from Adidas PrimeKnit fabric. This gives a sock-like fit and secure feel with each step. The seamless finish makes it comfortable to wear.

The upper of Cumulus is made with Engineered mesh. It is almost seamless. The reflective material used on the shoe upper gives better visibility is the low-light places.

Adidas Ultraboost is a multipurpose shoe. They can be used right from daily training to running a marathon. They are also used for indoor or outdoor sports.

Cumulus is mostly used for daily training and road running. They are more suited for a moderate distance run.

+ POSITIVES

  • very comfortable and cushy and good shock absorption.
  • Good for runners with normal arches
  • Good for neutral runners 
  • Lightweight.
  • Sock-like fit make it snug on your foot
  • The outsole design can handle traction on wet surfaces.
  • Available in 27 attractive shades
  • Good for runners suffering from calf pain or Achilles Tendinitis.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some runners may find the toe-box depth to be little less.

New Balance 1400 V6 is a lightweight and fast running shoe and it is our next alternative for Asics Cumulus.

This is a neutral running shoe for runners with high arches.

The weight of the shoe is very much comparable to that of Cumulus.

It has the same heel drop as Cumulus, 10mm.

The midsole of 1400 V6 is designed using the RevLite foam. This delivers great cushioning and responsiveness.  There is an additional sock-liner present for more comfort and softness.

The midsole of Cumulus is designed for soft cushioning and springy action. it uses the FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel technologies.  The gel unit present underfoot offers good shock-absorption.

The outsole of 1400 V6 uses the blown rubber. This offers better traction and makes the shoe more durable.

The outsole of Cumulus uses the AHAR rubber for better durability and flexibility.

The upper of 1400 V6 is designed using the Engineered Mesh for a lighter and softer feel. It uses a synthetic overlay for strategically placed on the upper of the shoe to give a more secure fit. The upper comes with almost no-sew fabric which delivers a non-irritation ride.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using a 3D Engineered mesh. It also uses a reflective material on the upper for better visibility.

New Balance 1400 V6 can be used for running on road, tracks, and even on flat trails.

Cumulus is used for daily training or running on road and treadmill.

 

+ POSITIVES

  • Soft and comfortable
  • Responsive
  • Light, soft and breathable upper.
  • Almost no-sew for better comfort
  • The outsole makes it a versatile shoe for road, tracks and trails.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some runners fit the fit to be a little narrow.

Here is another running shoe that is comparable with Asics Cumulus is the Reebok Floatride Energy 2.

This is a neutral running shoe with high arch support.

The weight of the shoe is very much in the same range as that of Cumulus.

Even the heel drop is also the same as Cumulus, 10 mm.

The midsole of Floatride is made with the FloatRide Energy. This runs through the entire length of the shoe. This material makes the shoe lightweight and responsive.  The cushioned insole gives soft support to underfoot.

The midsole of Cumulus uses the FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel technologies to make the shoe well-cushioned and responsive. The underfoot gel units add to the shock absorption of the shoe.

The outsole of Floatride is made with carbon rubber. It bears shallow grooves on the forefoot. The outsole offers flexibility and makes the shoe long-lasting.

The outsole of Cumulus is designed using the AHAR rubber.

The upper of Floatride is designed using an Engineered mesh which gives a customized fit. The material is highly breathable and keeps the foot well ventilated. The upper is almost seamless for greater comfort.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using a 3D engineered mesh. The special reflective material on the upper improves visibility.

Reebok Floatride is yet another multipurpose shoe. It can be used for daily training, long-distance running, or even for marathon running. It can also be used for jogging and all-day wearing.

Cumulus is used mostly for moderate-distance road running and daily training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with Plantar Fasciitis.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Durable.

 NEGATIVES

  • You may have to order half size bigger.
  • Need some time to be broken in.

Asics Gel Kensei OG is yet another running shoe as an alternative to Asics Cumulus.

This is also and neutral running shoes designed for runners with normal arches, same as Cumulus.

The weight of Kensie is slightly more than Cumulus, however, it does not impact your performance.

The midsole of Kensie uses Rearfoot Gel Technology. This helps in reducing the shock and making the shoe more comfortable. It uses the TRUSSTIC System technology to reduce the weight of the sole. It uses the I.G.S technology to maintain the natural gait of the foot. It also comes with the Ortholite sock-liner to give extra comfort.

The midsole of Cumulus is designed using the FlyteFoam Midsole and FlyteFoam Propel Technology giving a good bounce with cushioning.  The SpevaFoam 45 Lasting features give additional bounce.  There is the Gel unit present in the rearfoot and forefoot for shock-absorption. Even Cumulus uses I.G.S Technology and has an Ortholite sock-liner.

The outsole of Kensie is made using the AHAR Plus rubber. This is 50% more durable than AHAR rubber and hence extends more durability of the shoe.

The outsole of Cumulus is made with AHAR rubber.

The upper of Kensie is made using the synthetic mesh. This is a lightweight breathable fabric and keeps the foot dry and ventilated.

The upper of Cumulus is designed using a 3D Engineered mesh. There is a special reflective material present on the upper for better visibility.

The Asics Gel-Kensie can be used on road for daily running, long-distance running, and even for running marathon.

The Asics Cumulus is also used for daily training and running on road, however, this may not be very comfortable for long-distance running.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with Plantar Fasciitis.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Durable.

 NEGATIVES

  • You may have to order half size bigger.
  • Need some time to be broken in.
Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

What are the best alternatives to Asics Gel Cumulus? Here are the best running shoes that can compete with Asics Gel Cumulus at any level. Check them out now.

What are the best alternatives to Asics Gel Cumulus? Here are the best running shoes that can compete with Asics Gel Cumulus at any level. Check them out now.

Related Posts

Related

Brooks Ghost Vs Levitate Thumbnail-min

Brooks Ghost Vs Revel Thumbnail-min

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don't accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.

The Top 10 Best Brooks Revel Alternatives That You Can Safely Try! [2020]

The Top 10 Best Brooks Revel Alternatives That You Can Safely Try! [2020]

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

Brooks  Revel is a very good running shoe designed for neutral runners.

It comes with perfect cushioning and secure fit much needed for long-running.

Today’s comparison baseline is Brooks Revel 4.

Let’s look into the best Brooks Revel alternatives that can give it a run for its money.

The Best Brooks Revel Alternative

Last update on 2020-10-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Why it is the best match?

  • Neutral running shoes like Brooks Revel
  • Good for long-distance running, treadmill, and roads.
  • The midsole uses BioMoGo DNA the same as Revel.
  • Weighs close to Revel.

Let’s understand Brooks Revel

Today we are looking at some of the best alternative shoes for Brooks Revel 4.

Before that, let us dive into Brooks Revel to know it better.

This becomes essential because unless you don’t have the correct understanding of Revel, you will not be able to select the best alternative for Revel.

Brooks Revel 4 is a light-weight neutral running shoe best suited got runners with medium to high arches.

It weighs around 8.9oz/252 g and has midsole drop 8mm.

It has a midsole designed using BioMoGo DNA which provides excellent cushioning and support.

As per Brooks, Revel has cushioning of type of “Energize”  which makes the shoe more responsive, thereby enhancing your performance.

The outsole of the shoe comes with Green Rubber which provides a springy motion making this shoe more responsive.

It has an arrow-point outsole pattern which makes heel to toe drop transition quick thus helping you to use the energy return without losing any of it in transition.

The upper of the shoe is designed using Fit-Knit. This adds to a trendy look along with a secure fit.

The Revel 4 is best suited for Road and Treadmill running. However, you can also use it for cross-training.

Running shoes similar to Brooks Revel – Detailed Comparison

Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.8)

BROOKS GHOST 12

We keep Brooks Ghost 12 as our first preference for the alternative of Brooks Revel.

Both these are lightweight running shoes designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches.

Ghost 12 weighs around 10.4oz/294.8 g, a little more than Revel, but these few grams will not impact your performance.

The heel to toe drop in Ghost is, however, more than Revel. Ghost having 12 mm whereas Revel has 8 mm.

The main difference however lies in the cushioning of the midsole and outsole.

Ghost has the midsole designed with BioMoGo DNA and DNA Loft. This keeps shoe-weight low and provides substantial cushioning.  This makes it a good choice for long-distance running.

Revel has BioMoGo DNA as the midsole.  The cushioning here gives a springy action and makes the shoe more responsive.

The outsole of Ghost is made with blown rubber and has Segmented Crashpad.  This technology adds stability in each stride.

The Revel has an outsole made with BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber. The arrow-point outsole pattern makes heel to toe transition very fast.

The upper of Brooks Ghost is designed using the 3D Flex technology, which gives you a customized fit.

The upper of Revel is designed with Fit-Knit material giving a fashionable look and secure fit.

Brooks Ghost is mostly used for long-distance running, road, and treadmill, and cross-training.

This is very similar to Brooks Revel which can be used for road and treadmill running and cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Good responsiveness.
  • Well-cushioned.
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Comes in a wide range of colors.
  • Can be used for walking.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems a bit off.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.7)
SALOMON SPEEDCROSS 5

Solomon Speedcross 5 is the next running shoe as the next alternative to Brooks Revel.

Spreedcross 5 is essentially designed for trail running and these are one of the best trail running shoes available.

This is the biggest difference between Brooks Revel and SpeedCross and is suited for runners looking for a trail running shoe similar to Brooks Revel.

The main uses of Brooks Revel are for road and treadmill running and cross-training.

Revel is designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches. Speedscross is not specific to any particular pronation type or arches. It is designed to cater to runners with different pronations.

Speedcross has midsole drop 10 mm, which is very close to Brooks Revel.

The weight of SpeedCross is 320g, a little heavier than Revel. Since Speedcross is primarily a trail running shoe, the weight difference is due to its design.

The Speedcross 5 has EnergyCell+ midsole. This gives softer cushioning and makes it highly rebounding. 

The heel unit is well cushioned and it creates a cradle for your heel. This ensures stability with each step.

The midsole of Revel is designed using BioMoGo DNA. It gives good cushioning and springy action.

The outsole of Speedcross 5 comes with wider lugs placed strategically placed to give better push-off grip and braking grip.  This makes the shoes useful on all kinds of surfaces.

The outsole of Revel has BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber making the shoe more responsive.  The arrow-point design on the outsole makes the heel to toe transition very fast.

One of the striking features of SpeedCross 5 is it’s upper.  The upper is designed using an anti-debris mesh, which prevents twigs and pebbles from creeping into the shoe.

The stitch-free welded upper provides a secure fit. Speedcross 5 comes with Solomon’s signature Quicklace kit which makes the easy and comfortable wearing of shoes.

The upper of Revel is designed using Fit-Knit, giving a fashionable look and secure-fit.

+ POSITIVES

  • Very well cushioned.
  • highly responsiveness.
  • Great stability in each stride
  • Good grip.
  • Anti-debris mesh.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Well suited for trail running.
  • Comes in attractive colors.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some users find the size to run a little smaller.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)

BROOKS GLYCERIN 18

Brooks Glycerine 18 is our next running shoes as an alternative for Brooks Revel.

Both these shoes are best suited for neutral runners with medium to high arches.

They both have a midsole drop of 10 mm.

If you compare their weights, they fall in the same range.

However, the main difference lies in the cushioning provided by each shoe.

Glycerin has DNA LOFT in the midsole. This gives Glycerin super-soft cushioning. It comes with Ortholite sock-liner which gives additional cushioning.

Revel on the other hand has BioMoGo DNA in the midsole.  This gives good comfort and springy action making the shoe more responsive.

The outsole of Glycerin has blown rubber and comes fit plush fit for a smooth heel to toe transition.

Brooks Revel has BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber in the outsole. The arrow-point patter in the outsole makes the heel to toe transition very smooth and fast.

The upper of Glycerin is designed nursing the 3D Fit. It is designed using the double-jacquard mesh for better flexibility and comfort.

The upper of Revel is designed using Fit-Knit.

Brooks Glycerin 18 is mostly used for long-distance running, road, or treadmill running.

Revel is used mostly for road or treadmill running and also for cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Increased DNA LOFT makes the shoe very cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches.
  • Good for the neutral runner
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Comes with Ortholite sock-liner that increases the cushioning.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems a bit odd. If you wear a thick sock, you may need to order a 1/2 size larger.
Editor Rating: 4 and a half star rating (4.5)
ADIDAS ULTRABOOST 20

Our next candidate is Adidas UltraBoost 20 which can serve as a viable alternative to Brooks Revel.

Both these shoes are designed for neutral runners with medium to high arches. They both have midsole drop 10 mm.

Adidas UltraBoost 20 is however a bit heavier, weighing around 10.9 oz/310 g. However, there is not much difference in the weights so this will not impact your performance in any way.

The main difference lies in their midsole design.

The UltraBoost has a midsole designed using BOOST technology.

Basically these are like small capsules capable of releasing energy, making the shoes all the more responsive.

The BOOST material runs through the complete midsole of the shoe.

The UltraBoost 20 comes with 20% more Boost than the previous version which makes it even more responsive.

Brooks Revel has BioMoGo DNA midsole. The midsole makes Revel super comfortable and provides it with springy action.

The outsole of UltraBoost is made of Continental Rubber and has a stretch web pattern. This adds to the stability of the shoes and provides you with a better grip on wet surfaces also.

The outsole of Revel has BioMogo DNA and Green Rubber. It has an arrow-point design on the outsole for faster midsole transition.

The upper of Ultraboost is made from Adidas PrimeKnit, which gives a sock-like fit and snugs well on the foot.  The seamless finish makes it comfortable to wear.

The upper of the Revel is made with Fit-Knit.

Ultraboost is a versatile shoe and can be used right from marathon to everyday training. These can be used for playing various sports as well.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for neutral runners.
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Comes in 27 attractive colors.
  • Sock-like fit for better comfort and stability.
  • Outsole designed for good grip on wet surfaces.
  • Boost midsole running through the entire shoe adding more bounce and shock absorption.
  • Good for runners who suffer from calf pain and Achilles Tendinitis.

 NEGATIVES

  • Some users may find the toe-box depth slightly less.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
NIKE AIR ZOOM PEGASUS 36

Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 36 is our next alternative to Brooks Revel 4.

It is one of the most preferred running shoes available.

It has the same pronation support  – “Neutral” and the same arch support, “middle to high arches” like Revel.

The heel drop of Pegasus is little more than Revel –  10mm and it is just a few grams heavier than Revel, which you will not even notice.

However, the major difference lies in the shoe design.

The midsole of Pegasus has an Air Zoom unit that runs all through the shoe. It is like a thick pillow of air below your sole.

To supplement it, there is an additional cushion provided by the Cushion ST Foam. It gives a great shock-absorption and response.

The Revel has a midsole designed using BioMoGo DNA. This gives good cushioning and springy action.

The outsole of Pegasus has rubber pods placed strategically for giving adequate grip.

Revel has the outsole of BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber. It gives springy motion and makes the shoe more responsive. The arrow pattern on the outsole makes a quick transition of the heel to toe.

The upper of Pegasus is made with the fly0mesh fabric. This is very durable and good breathability is there. It prevents heat from building up inside the shoes.

Pegasus 36 has a narrowed heel counter for good heel grip and slimmer tongue.

The shoelace is intact using Nike’s Flywire, giving a secure and tight fit even when you are running really fast.

The new aerodynamic design of the shoe enhances speed.

The upper of Revel is designed using the Fit-Knit fabric.

Pegasus can be used for medium-paced long-distance running. It is mostly used for running on the hard surfaces – road, treadmill, and even hard surface trail.

Revel is mostly used for road or treadmill and cross-training. 

+ POSITIVES

  • Very comfortable and cushy.
  • Responsiveness.
  • Good for runners with medium to high arches
  • Good for the neutral runner.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Durable
  • Well ventilated
  • Comes in attractive colors.
  • Good for runners suffering from calf pain or Achilles Tendinitis.

 NEGATIVES

  • A thinner tongue may cause lacing pressure.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
HOKA ONE ONE CLIFTON 6

Hoka One One Clifton 6 is another alternative to Brooks Revel 4.

Clifton 6 is a neutral running shoe and supports runners with medium to high arches the same as Revel.

It is slightly lighter than Revel, 9.1oz/242 g, a few grams lighter.

The heel drop of Clifton is also lesser than Revel being 5 mm.

The Clifton has the midsole designed with EVA Foam. This makes the shoe very soft and responsive.

The most striking feature of Clifton 6 is the early stage meta rockered geometry. This makes the strides smooth and swift.

Brooks Revel has the midsole designed using the BioMoGo DNA technology for soft cushioning and springy action.

The outsole of Clifton 6 is mostly EVA Foam with rubber pods strategically placed. This reduces the wear and tear of shoes and provides better traction.

The outsole of Revel has BioMoGo DNA and green Rubber. It has an arrow-point pattern giving a smoother and faster heel to toe transition.

The upper of Clifton 6 is made with engineered mesh. The fabric is highly durable and breathable.

There is an embroidery pattern on the sides of the shoe which locks the mid-foot.  It comes with a wider toe-box. The upper of Revel is made from Fit-Knit fabric.

Clifton 6  can be used for daily training, long or short distance running.

+ POSITIVES

  • Very good cushioning.
  • Responsive
  • Good for medium to the high arch runner.
  • Designed for neutral runners.
  • Lightweight.
  • Durable and breathable upper.
  • Toe-box is wide.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems a bit odd.
Editor Rating: 4 star rating-92X25-min(4.3)
NIKE FLEX EXPERIENCE RN 8

Our next alternative shoe for Brooks Revel is Nike Flex Experience RN 8.

This is lightweight super comfortable running shoes.

It is a neutral running shoes same as Revel.

Even the heel drop is very close to  Revel – 6mm.

It is slightly heavier than Revel, 9oz/320 g.

The Injected Unit sole forms the midsole of Nike Flex Experience RN 8. It makes the shoe resilient, flexible, and durable.

Revel has the midsole designed with BioMoGo technology.

The outsole of RN 8 has the same Injected Unit sole of the midsole along with rubber lugs. This considerably reduces the shoe weight.

The outsole showcases hexagonal flex grooves that offer 6 different flex points for running. The rounded heels give you the natural range of motion.  The high abrasion rubber lugs give more stability, durability, and traction.

The outsole of Revel has BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber and has arrow pattern for smoother and faster heel drop.

The upper of RN 8 is designed with the Knit fabric which makes the shoe very comfortable. The no-sew overlay at the laces and at the toe makes it more durable.

The upper of Revel comes with Fit-Knit fabric and gives a secure fit.

RN 8 is a multipurpose shoe that can be used for running, gym, or walking, mostly used for flat surfaces.

Revel is used for running on-road or treadmill and cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • Very comfortable.
  • Good for the neutral runner.
  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Comes in attractive colors.
  • Durable.
  • Multipurpose shoes and it can be used for running, walking, or gym.

 NEGATIVES

  • Sizing seems a bit odd.

Here is another running shoe that is comparable with Brooks Revel.

We are talking about the Saucony Guide ISO 2.

This is a neutral running shoe the same as Revel.

Even the arch support is for low to the medium arch.

The heel drop is also the same 8 mm.

The weight of the Saucony Guide is 10.3 Oz/292 g, which is just a bit over Revel and will not make much difference to your performance.

The Guide ISO has an all-new midsole. The top layer has a removable insole with the “EVARUN” top-sole and PWNFOAM midsole. Together they provide good cushioning and make the shoe very responsive.

Revel has the midsole designed with BioMoGo DNA.

The outsole of ISO is designed with a compound rubber. It has blown rubber under the forefoot and a harder compound under the heel.

The outsole of Revel has BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber.

The upper of the Saucony Guide ISO is designed with ISOFIT. This adapts to the shape and motion of the foot imparting maximum comfort and keeps them secure. The fabric is soft, lightweight, and breathable. The upper also has the “FORMFIT” contoured footbed.

The Revel has the upper made with Fit-Knit fabric for a very secure fit.

Saucony Guide ISO 2 can be used for running on medium-paced running on flat surfaces like road, trail, and treadmill.

Revel is used for running on-road or treadmill running and cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable.
  • Responsive.
  • Lightweight.
  • Breathable.
  • Good traction.

 NEGATIVES

  • The shoe may get a little warm.

The next shoe which is another good alternative of Revel is Asics Gel Nimbus 22.

Now, both these shoes work best for neutral runners.  Although Nimbus works for underpronation as well.

Revel has arch support of medium to high arches, Nimbus is perfect for normal arches.

Talking about the heel drop, it is 10 mm in  Nimbus.  This comes in the same range to that of Revel’s 8mm.

The weight of Nimbus is 10.9 oz/309g a little more than Revel.  However, this difference in weight will not impact your performance as you will hardly notice it.

The midsole of Nimbus has Gel-based cushioning and an additional layer of FLYTEFOAM. Together they make excellent shock absorber and give great cushioning and flexibility.

Revel has a midsole designed using BioMoGo technology.

The upper of Asics Gel Nimbus is made using the engineered mesh. This makes it flexible and gives a secure fit.

It also uses TRUSSTIC technology under the arch of the shoe for better stability and durability of the shoe.

The upper of Revel is made with the Fit-Knit material.

The outsole Nimbus is AHAR rubber with deep grooves. This gives good stability and smooth ride and heel to toe transition.

The outsole of Revel is BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber for faster midsole transition.

Asics Gel Nimbus is used mostly for long-distance running. They can also be used for trail running.

Revel is mostly used for road or treadmill running and cross-training. 

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good shock-absorption.
  • Light-weight
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Good for road and trail running.

 NEGATIVES

  • Shoe upper could have been thicker.

Brooks Launch 7 is also a great alternative to Brooks Revel.

Brooks Launch is a neutral running shoe for medium to high arches.

Revel is also neutral running shoes with a medium arch.

The Brooks Launch has a heel drop of 12 mm very close to that of Revel.

The weight of Launch is 8.8oz/249 g, very close to that of Revel.

The main difference lies in their cushioning.

As per Brooks, Launch has cushioning of the type “Speed”  and has the level. It has the midsole designed using the BioMoGo DNA and rebounding rubber. Together they provide great cushioning and make the shoe very responsive.

Revel has the cushioning of the type “Energize”  and designed using the BioMoGo DNA to give a balanced and soft cushioning.

The outsole of Launch is mostly covered with blown rubber, forms “X” on the midfoot to provide smooth midfoot transitioning.

The outsole of Revel has BioMoGo DNA and Green Rubber. It has an arrow-point pattern for faster midsole transition.

The upper of Launch is made with a single-piece fabric and internal bootie which gives you a light and breezy feel.

Revel has the upper designed with Fit-Knit fabric.

Launch can be used for speed-running on tracks, roads, or treadmill.

Revel is used for road or treadmill running or cross-training.

+ POSITIVES

  • These running shoes are very comfortable and cushy.
  • Good responsiveness.
  • Good for speed training.
  • Stylish to look at.
  • Light and breezy upper.
  • Available in attractive colors.

 NEGATIVES

  • You may have to order half size bigger.

FAQs

What is the difference between Brooks Revel and Brooks Ghost?

Brooks Ghost and Revel are both best suited for neutral runners with medium arches.

They both are lightweight and comfortable running shoes.

However, the main difference lies in the cushioning provided by them.

According to Brooks, Ghost has cushioning on the type “Cushion”. These are designed to soft and protective cushioning.

Revel on the other hand has cushioning of the type “Energize”. These are designed for soft cushion as well as spring-like action which makes the shoe more responsive.

Lets read about their difference in details here. 

Are Brooks Revel good for Plantar Fasciitis?

Yes, Revel is a good shoe for Plantar Fasciitis.  These shoes have a good amount of cushioning at the heel which makes them comfortable for runners suffering from Plantar Fasciitis.

Are Brooks Revel good for flat feet?

Brooks Revel is primarily a neutral running shoe but comes with adequate arch support. This makes it used by the flat foot runners also.

How far does Brooks Revel last?

Brooks Revel lasts anywhere between 300 to 500 miles. Here is a little picture that says it all.

Running Shoe replacement guideline

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Best Brooks Revel Alternatives. These running shoes are the top alternatives for Brooks Revel that your suit your style.

More Alternative Shoes…

Related

Site Information

FTC and Affiliate Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate for some reputed brands, I earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost you. If you want to know more check here.

We don’t accept any payment whether in cash or otherwise for the reviews. They are written with the intention to help our users select better products. We try to be as objective as possible while writing the reviews.