Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing Chart: How Are They Different?

When you compare Saucony vs ASICS sizing, it becomes very interesting.

TBH, I also did not know what exactly are the differences, before I did the research for this article.

When you compare data side by side, the kind of details that pop up is just fascinating…

Did you know ASICS has some odd measurements for some of the sizes and those size numbers actually tally up with Saucony, whose length is again different from ASICS?

Did I confuse you? Well, don’t worry I’ll present the differences between ASICS and Saucony sizing as clearly as possible.

BTW, I did not compare the heel-to-toe drop of Saucony and Asics with each other as I’ve already covered that in this article.

Let’s procced…

Related: Do Hokas Run Big, Small, Or True To Size?

Saucony Vs Asics Sizing

Saucony Vs ASICS Sizing: Differences

1. For some lengths ASICS lengths increase by 0.25cm and not by cm0.5 like 25.25cm, 28.25cm for men, and 22.75cm, 25cm.75 for women. Such an increase is not present in Saucony.

2. For Saucony women’s size starts from 21.5cm(8.46 in)/5(US)/3(UK)/35.5(EU). For ASICS women’s size starts from 22.75cm (8.96 in)/5.5(US)/3.5(UK)/36(EU).

3. For Saucony men’s size starts from 22.5cm (8.86 in)/4.5(US)/3.5(UK)/37(EU). For ASICS men’s size starts from 22.5cm (8.86 in)/4(US)/3(UK)36(EU).

4. Most of the men’s sizes of Saucony are equivalent to an ASICS number by 0.5 steps. It is the same for women’s except for the bigger sizes.

5. For women’s shoes ASICS has the sizes 5.5(US)/3.5(UK)/36(EU) corresponding to the length of 22.75cm(8.96 in). Such a size is not present in Saucony.

6. For women’s shoes ASICS has the size 9(US)/7(UK)/40.5(EU) corresponding to the length of 25.75cm(10.13 in). Although the same numbers are present in Saucony it represents the length of 25.5cm (10.03 in).

7. For men’s shoes, ASICS has the size 7(US)/6(UK)/40(EU) corresponding to the length of 25.25cm(10.13 in). Although the same numbers are present in Saucony it represents the length of 25cm (9.84 in).

8. For men’s shoes, ASICS has the size 10.5(US)/9.5(UK)/44.5(EU) corresponding to the length of 28.25cm(10.13 in). Although the same numbers are present in Saucony it represents the length of 28.5cm (11.22 in).

9. Saucony has more sizes of men’s shoes for the longer lengths than ASICS.

10. For women’s shoes ASICS has more sizes available than Saucony for longer lengths.

11. For women’s shoes Saucony has more sizes available than Asics for shorter lengths.

Related: Running Shoe Heel Drop Chart (Illustrated)

Saucony Vs ASICS Sizing: Women’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Saucony (US)

ASICS (US)

Saucony (UK)

ASICS (UK)

Saucony (EU)

ASICS (EU)

-

4

-

2

-

34.5

-

-

4.5

-

2.5

-

35

-

21.5 cm

(8.46 in)

5

-

3

-

35.5

-

22 cm

(8.66 in)

5.5

-

3.5

-

36

-

22.5 cm

(8.85 in)

6

-

4

-

37

-

22.75 cm

(8.96 in)

-

5.5

-

3.5

-

36

23 cm

(9.05 in)

6.5

6

4.5

4

37.5

37

23.5 cm

(9.25 in)

7

6.5

5

4.5

38

37.5

24 cm

(9.45 in)

7.5

7

5.5

5

38.5

38

24.5 cm

(9.65 in)

8

7.5

6

5.5

39

39

25 cm

(9.85 in)

8.5

8

6.5

6

40

39.5

25.5 cm

(10.03 in)

9

8.5

7

6.5

40.5

40

25.75 cm

(10.13 in)

-

9

-

7

-

40.5

26 cm

(10.24 in)

9.5

9.5

7.5

7.5

41

41.5

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

10

10

8

8

42

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

10.5

10.5

8.5

8.5

42.5

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

11

11

9

9

43

43.5

28 cm

(11.03 in)

-

11.5

-

9.5

-

44

28.5 cm

(11.23 in)

-

12

-

10

-

44.5

Download Saucony Vs Asics Size Chart For Women

Related: Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

ASICS Vs Saucony Sizing: Men’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Saucony (US)

ASICS (US)

Saucony (UK)

ASICS (UK)

Saucony (EU)

ASICS (EU)

-

3

-

2

-

35

-

-

3.5

-

2.5

-

35.5

-

-

4

-

3

-

36

-

22.5cm

(8.86 in)

4.5

4

3.5

3

37

36

23cm

(9.05 in)

5

4.5

4

3.5

37.5

37

23.5cm

(9.25 in)

5.5

5

4.5

4

38

37.5

24cm

(9.45 in)

6

5.5

5

4.5

38.5

38

24.5cm

(9.64 in)

6.5

6

5.5

5

39

39

25 cm

(9.84 in)

7

6.5

6

5.5

40

39.5

25.25 cm

(9.94 in)

-

7

-

6

-

40

25.5 cm

(10.04 in)

7.5

7.5

6.5

6.5

40.5

40.5

26 cm

(10.24 in)

8

8

7

7

41

41.5

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

8.5

8.5

7.5

7.5

42

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

9

9

8

8

42.5

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

9.5

9.5

8.5

8.5

43

43.5

28 cm

(11.02 in)

10

10

9

9

44

44

28.25 cm

(11.12 in)

-

10.5

-

9.5

-

44.5

28.5 cm

(11.22 in)

10.5

11

9.5

10

44.5

45

29 cm

(11.42 in)

11

11.5

10

10.5

45

46

29.5 cm

(11.61 in)

11.5

12

10.5

11

46

46.5

30 cm

(11.81 in)

12

-

11

-

46.5

-

30.5 cm

(12 in)

12.5

-

11.5

-

47

-

31 cm

(12.20 in)

13

-

12

-

48

-

-

14

-

13

-

49

-

-

15

-

14

-

50

-

-

16

-

15

-

51.5

-

Download ASICS size compared to Saucony (Men)

Related: New Balance Size Chart Vs Nike

Related: Top 15 Best Running Shoes for Morton’s Neuroma Reviewed

Do ASICS Run Bigger Or Smaller Than Saucony?

No, ASICS doesn’t run bigger or smaller than Saucony as for almost every length of Saucony there is an ASICS running shoe present, except for some of the higher and lower sizes.

However, this misconception arises because the numbers that the shoe represents in both brands are different.

For example, let’s pick the size 6.5(US) of Saucony for the women’s shoes which are 23 cm in length. The same length is represented by ASICS with the number 6(US).

Let’s check another example…

For the length of 26.5 cm of women’s shoes both ASICS and Saucony represent it with the number 10(US).

You can find many such examples where for the same length the number that ASICS uses is bigger than that of Saucony.

So, basically every number that a shoe represents in any of these brands may represent the same or a different length and neither of them runs smaller or bigger than the other.

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

10 Best 5mm Drop Running Shoes [2022]

10 Best 5mm Drop Running Shoes [2022]

[aff_disclosure]

There are a lot of running shoes available on the market that has a medium heel-to-toe drop. Most running shoe companies manufacture them. If you try to find 5mm heel drop running shoes, it becomes a bit tedious.

This category is dominated by Hoka One One and you will get a variety of shoes that has a 5mm drop.

If you are short on time and don’t want to spend it reading this whole article, you can blindly go with Hoka Clifton 8.

This is one of the shoes that are at the top of the list and in my mind.

Most of the popular shoe companies like Brooks, New Balance, Nike, Mizuno, and Salomon don’t manufacture a running shoe that has a 5mm drop.

Asics and Adidas do manufacture them, but with the overwhelming number of models that they have, it is tedious to find such a shoe.

Now being said, we know that you don’t have that kind of time to go through the overwhelming choices that are there.

So, we have come up with a list of the 10 best 5mm drop running shoes that will narrow down the search for you.

We have included shoes for every type of runner like overpronation, underpronation, neutral, road, and trail runners. Hopefully, you will find your match.

Best 5mm drop running shoes

Best 5mm Heel Drop Running Shoes (Detailed Review)

HOKA CLIFTON

The first running shoe that we have in the 5mm heel drop category is Hoka Clifton 8. If you are not living under the rock, then you must have heard about Clifton.

Also, if you are a long-term runner, you may also have used one. Nonetheless, Clifton is one of the best running shoes in the market and tops our 5mm heel drop chart.

Clifton comes from the house of Hoka and is a very well-cushioned running shoe. It has excellent forefoot and rearfoot cushioning which comes from CMEVA or compression-molded EVA.

The heel stack of Hoka Clifton is 37mm and the forefoot is 32mm which is equal to 37mm-32mm=5mm heel-to-toe drop.

Although having a lowish drop, Clifton has a huge amount of cushioning which is evident from its high heel and forefoot stack.

Apart from excellent cushioning, Clifton is a good-looking and stylish shoe. With the incorporation of the extended pull tab and a contrasting color of the collar, its appeal has increased further.

The running platform is also very stable and it will do an excellent job at shock absorption in landing on forefoot or midfoot.

It comes with a beveled heel, however, that is not used in the calculation of the heel-to-toe drop of Clifton. This would have reduced the drop further.

This is not used because, to measure the height of the heel and the forefoot, you will have to place the shoe on a flat surface and measure the heel height and the forefoot height from that surface.

Pros

  • Good fit and style.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Available in two widths, regular and wide.
  • Excellent for foot issues like metatarsalgia and bunions.

Cons

  • Not good for long toes.
HOKA ONE ONE MACH 4

Hoka Mach is an everyday running shoe and comes with responsive PROFLY cushioning. It is shock-absorbing and snappy and is excellent for racing.

This is a very lightweight shoe with a weight of around 7.2oz. Hoka Mach 4 also has a very close cousin called Hoka Mach Supersonic. It has very similar features to that of Hoka Mach.

The only difference that I found is the slight difference in weight and the additional pull tab ribbon that is not present in Hoka Mach.

From the cushioning level perspective, both are equivalent, and here is why…

The kind of cushioning that they use is the same PROFLY and the heel-to-toe drop and both stack heights are the same.

I’m digressing…let’s get back to Hoka Mach 4.

Hoka Mach 4 has a heel stack of 35mm and the forefoot stack of 30mm. So the heel-to-toe offset of Hoka Mach is 5mm, which is the same as Clifton as mentioned above.

However, the level of cushioning of Hoka Mach is slightly less than Hoka Clifton which is evident from the stack height and the kind of cushioning materials used in both types of shoes.

The PROFLY material is slightly stiffer and more responsive and is great for day-to-day running and races.

This kind of drop makes it an ideal choice for runners who run on forefoot or midfoot.

Stylewise Hoka Mach looks great and is very stylish. The anatomical Achilles construction provides you with excellent Achilles support and is great for preventing blisters.

Pros

  • Good for everyday running, and races.
  • Very responsive.
  • Stylish.
  • Early-stage meta-rocker.
  • Good for sesamoiditis.

Cons

  • Not available in a wider fit.

Related: Hoka Mach Vs Arahi: Which Hoka Should You Choose?

Hoka Mach Vs Bondi: Which Hoka One One Should Your Choose?

HOKA RINCON

Like the previous two, Hoka Rincon is also a neutral running shoe. It comes with a balanced cushioning as per Hoka.

However, when I tried it on, it feels more like plush cushioning, and you won’t be feeling the unevenness of the roads.

Being a balanced cushioned shoe, it provides you with good responsiveness. Hoka Rincon is good for running longer distances and will keep you comfortable.

Unlike Hoka Mach, Rincon has high abrasive rubber pasted on the high wear and tear areas. This ensures that Rincon has an excellent grip on the roads and will last you for a long time.

Now coming back to the drop of this shoe, Hoka Rincon like all the previous Hoka running shoes on this list, has a drop of 5mm.

Hoka Rincon has a heel stack of 33mm and a forefoot stack of 28mm, the difference of which comes as 5mm.

Although Rincon and Clifton belong to the same category of shoes with neutral pronation and balanced cushioning, the cushioning level of Clifton is slightly higher than that of Rincon.

This is very evident from the stack height difference between these two shoes, however, when you wear these shoes, you will be very comfortable.

Also, having a slightly lesser stack height makes Rincon a bit more responsive which is not there in Clifton and you will feel the slight dampening of the energy return when you wear Clifton.

So, although both the shoes have the same drop with respect to heel-to-toe, the experience that you will get out of these two shoes is very different.

Pros

  • Responsive.
  • Good for a marathon.
  • Prevents blisters.
  • Well-cushioned.
  • Stylish but traditional.

Cons

  • The tongue feels thin.
  • The fitting is a bit snug.

Related: Why Do Hokas Hurt Your Feet? (All models explained)

ASICS MAGIC SPEED

This is the first ASICS running shoe on our list that has a 5mm drop. As mentioned earlier, ASICS is one of the few companies that manufacture a 5mm drop shoe.

With Hoka the predominant drop is 5mm, however, with ASICS, you will get a wide range of drops starting from a low drop, followed by mid-drop and even the high drop running shoes.

 However, each of these categories has excellent running shoes and will provide you with a great running experience.

ASICS Magic Speed is no different. It is a comfortable running shoe that is great for long-distance running as well.

This is one of the few shoes that are under $100 and has a carbon fiber plate in them. With a mix of FLYTEFOAM, Carbon Fiber Plate, and GUIDESOLE, this is one of the most efficient shoes around.

However, since this is on this list, it also has a drop of 5mm.

Why?

The heel stack of ASICS Magic Speed is 34mm and the forefoot stack is 29mm. The difference between the two is 5mm. In other words, the heel-to-toe offset of ASICS Magic Speed is 5mm.

This is a very efficient running shoe, however, looks-wise it is not at all traditional. It is very stylish to look at and will definitely make you stand out in a crowd.

Also, this is a very lightweight shoe that is great for longer distances where every extra gram matters.

Pros

  • Lightweight.
  • Stylish.
  • Cushy.
  • Pocket friendly with carbon fiber plate.

Cons

  • Sizing seems to be an issue.
  • Loosening of laces will be required to slip it on.
ASICS GLIDERIDE 2

ASICS GlideRide 2 is the second and last Asics running shoe on this list. It is a max cushioned running shoe and is excellent for long-distance running.

 The side profile of Asics GlideRide looks very similar to that of Asics Magic Speed, however, the technologies that it uses are completely different.

One thing of GlideRide is very similar to Hoka other than the drop is that it also uses a rocker midsole.

This makes your running feel more effortless and you can run longer with less tiredness.

The primary midsole material of this shoe is the FlyteFoam. However, to make this shoe more bouncy it comes with an additional layer of FlyteFoam Propel. This makes the shoe feel more energetic and is very responsive.

Despite being max-cushioned the drop of this shoe is 5mm. The heel stack of Asics GlideRide 2 is 40mm and the forefoot stack is 35mm.

This is the most cushioned running shoe in this 5mm heel drop running shoes list. This is a fact shoe and has a different appeal than the rest of the running shoes on this list.

Although max cushioned, it doesn’t look as bulky as a Hoka shoe. On the contrary, it looks sleek and stylish and has a strikingly different design.

It comes with a comfortable in-shoe experience with a well-padded collar. The tongue is definitely more padded than Asics Magic Speed and will keep you comfortable.

Like most running shoes, Asics GlideRide also has adopted a flat lace design. It is made from polyester and will remain tied throughout your running session.

It is one of the most comfortable shoes in the 5mm heel drop category.

Pros

  • Shock absorbing.
  • Great for uptempo runs.
  • Stylish.
  • Maximal cushioning.

Cons

  • Not good for anything else other than running.
Hoka Challenger ATR

Hoka Challenger ATR 6 is a trail running shoe that can be used on the roads as well. It is good for any kind of trail and for roads that are not too smooth.

It is well cushioned and is great at shock absorption. The cushioning level of the Hoka Challenger ATR is high. It is slightly higher than Clifton which has balanced cushioning.

The midsole of the Hoka Challenger ATR is made from CMEVA or compression-molded EVA which is the same material as Clifton.

Also, the overall cushioning height of both the forefoot and the heels is the same as the Clifton.

Hoka Challenger ATR has a heel-to-toe drop of 5mm. The forefoot stack measures 32mm whereas the heel stack measures 37mm providing an effective drop of 5mm.

This is a shoe that is true to size with arch support of medium to high arches.

The upper has dual-layer mesh that is breathable and comfortable and is built with Unifi REPREVE recycled yarn.

It has a textured TPU toe cap that increases toe protection and saves you from unlikely injuries.

Since this is a trail running shoe, it has sizable lugs on its outsole. The individual lug length is around 4mm and provides reliable traction on the trails.

Like Clifton, Hoka Challenger also comes with an early-stage meta rocker. This helps you with an easier heel-to-toe transition and an overall lesser effort in running.

Pros

  • Very comfortable.
  • Decent-sized lugs for stability on terrains.
  • Can work on multiple surfaces.
  • Eco-friendly.
  • Gusseted tongue.

Cons

  • Lateral stability is less.

Related: Hoka Vs New Balance: Which Brand Is Right For You?

HOKA CARBON X3

This is the last Hoka running shoe on this list, I promise.

Hoka Carbon X 3 is a bit different than the rest of the Hokas that we have listed above. It is the one that has a carbon fiber plate and provides your feet with an additional pep.

To improve the peppiness of this running shoe along with using a carbon fiber plate, Hoka has combined PROFLY with CMEVA. PROFLY being more responsive adds another bit of snappiness to the cushioning.

Since this is in this list obviously the drop of this shoe is 5mm. Now, let’s check the stack height of these shoes…

The heel stack of Hoka Carbon X 3 is 37mm whereas the forefoot stack is around 32mm. This makes the overall heel drop as 5mm.

The level of cushioning of Carbon X 3 is similar to that of Clifton or Challenger ATR. However, the sole of Carbon X feels snappier than both of these shoes.

One of the reasons is, that the composition of the midsole is completely different than that of Clifton or Challenger.

Looks wise, Carbon X has the typical look of Hoka. It looks broad and big and comes with an integrated tongue.

This is great as the tongue will not move around and be uncomfortable. However, this makes one thing a bit problematic…you have to loosen the laces so that you can wear the shoes.

Also, the laces are flat and they remain tied throughout your running session. It comes with an extended pull-tab and this makes wearing this somewhat easier.

This also provides a bit of additional Achilles support and makes your running that much easier.

Pros

  • Cushy and shock absorbing.
  • Excellent responsiveness.
  • Good for multi-sport.

Cons

  • A bit snug.
  • Expensive.
ON CLOUDFLASH

ON Cloudflash looks more like a cycling shoe than a running shoe. But trust me, this is one of the best running shoes that you will ever run in.

However, ON Cloudflash is meant for shorter distances. If you run 10K or shorter distances, then it is one of the best running shoes out there. However, for longer distances, you may not be as comfortable in them.

This is refined over the years after taking feedback from the elite runners and what you have now is one of the fastest running shoes around.

It comes with two layers of Helion-powered CloudTec which means better cushioning and you will be able to feel the ground better.

Also, it has a carbon fiber-infused Speedboard that will deliver a more responsive ride.

The heel area is lower and has molded padding. This provides you with a more secure fit.

And of course, this has a drop of 5mm with a heel stack of 20mm and a forefoot stack of 15mm. This is the smallest stack height in the entire list of running shoes with 5mm drop or less.

Pros

  • Good for shorter distances.
  • Excellent shock absorption.
  • Lightweight.

Cons

  • Would have preferred a bit more tongue padding.
TOPO ATHLETIC ULTRAFLY 3

Topo Athletic is another brand other than Hoka that has a lot of running shoes that have 5mm drop.

Also, primarily a trail running brand, this is advantageous as there are hardly any 5mm shoes in other brands.

Although there are a lot of options to choose from, we have chosen two of them as including all the models that are available in this category is virtually impossible.

Feel free to do your research if you don’t the one that we have chosen…

The first model that we would like to show you is the Topo Athletic Ultrafly 3.

In this model, Ultrafly is introducing a new type of foam that is lighter and offers you more rebound than EVA. This foam is called Zipfoam.

Due to this foam, Ultrafly has become lighter and more responsive than the previous version…Also, technically this puts you in a position to run longer miles and enjoy more runs.

Ultrafly provides you with some stability with the use of medial posts. However, if you are a runner with severe overpronation, then this may not be the right shoe for you.

This running shoe is a bit heavier than some of the shoes on this list.

It has a rubber outsole, and is excellent with grip on the roads…yes, this is a road running shoe…

The drop of this running shoe is 5mm as expected. The heel stack is around 30mm and the forefoot stack is around 25mm. The difference between this two comes down to 5mm.

Pros

  • Good for road running and longer distances.
  • Moderate stability.
  • Good arch support.

Cons

  • Heavy.
TOPO ATHLETIC ULTRAVENTURE 2

This is the second 5mm drop running shoe that is great for the trails. As mentioned above, Topo Athletic is a brand that specializes in trail running shoes.

Also, this is one of the brands that have a large collection of 5mm drop shoes. We could not include all of them due to the space constraint, however, you can very well do your research here.

Now let’s focus on Topo Athletic ULTRAVENTURE 2.

This is a trail running shoe with a high level of cushioning. This is highly shock absorbing and is great for technical terrains.

This is a neutral running shoe that is formed with a 3-piece of EVA foam. This provides the midsole with just enough rigidity for a more snappy ride.

It comes with a TPU heel counter that provides you with more stability. It locks in the heels and doesn’t let it move around. With this heel counter, you will not face the problem of heel slip.

If you compare this version of ULTRAVENTURE with the previous model, you will find that the number of overlays has reduced. This improves the breathability of this running shoe and makes you more comfortable.

It comes with multi-directional lugs that provide you with excellent traction on a variety of surfaces.

Also, the Vibram XS Tek Outsole is great for better durability and traction.

And obviously, this is a 5mm drop running shoe. The heel stack of this shoe measures 34mm whereas the forefoot stack measures 29mm. So the effective drop of Topo Athletic ULTRAVENTURE is 5mm.

Pros

  • Great for technical trails.
  • Very cushy.
  • Multidirectional lugs for excellent traction.

Cons

  • Not good for runners with bunions.

FAQ

Is 5mm drop good?

Yes, 5mm is a good drop for a runner who lands on mid or forefoot. However, for a heel striker, a higher drop is preferable.

5mm drop stands on the borderline of low drop and medium drop with characteristics more like that of low drop shoe.

If you are a runner who runs on forefoot or midfoot, this is an ideal drop for you. Your feet have the optimal strength to handle the landing and your shoe also has to cushion in the right place.

However, if you are a heel striker, this may not be a good shoe for you.

Heel strikers are those runners who land on their heels. This causes your calf muscles to extend and stretch a lot more than that of a midfoot or forefoot striker. The same is true for your Achilles region as well.

For such a runner, it is preferable to have a higher heel drop as this will stop the overextending of your calf and Achilles area.

In such cases a drop of 8mm or higher is preferable.

What does 5mm drop mean?

The difference between the heel stack and the forefoot stack is 5mm. This is the meaning of 5mm drop.

For example:

Let’s say the heel stack or the heel height of a running shoe is 35mm and the forefoot stack or a forefoot height is 30mm, then the drop or the heel drop of the shoe is 5mm.

Again if the heel height is 20mm and the forefoot height is 15mm, the drop is 5mm.

If the heel height is 40mm and the forefoot height is 35mm, then also, the heel-to-toe offset is 5mm.

Basically, the heel-to-toe offset is independent of the stack height of the heel and forefoot and is merely a difference between the two values.

What is a normal running shoe drop?

Any drop is a normal running shoe drop and the choice will vary on the goal of the runner and the kind of the runner.

Currently, there are running shoes in the market whose drop ranges from 0-15mm, with 0-4mm being the low drop, 5-8mm being the medium drop, and 9-15mm being the high drop.

Each of the shoes is suited for a specific type of runner as mentioned previously.

Runners who have foot injuries or Achilles problem is better off with running shoes with greater than 8mm drop.

Whereas, if you want to strengthen your feet and want a more natural way of running, then go for running shoes with a 0-4mm drop.

A beginner may find a running shoe with a 5-8mm drop more suitable as they start getting accustomed to the way of running.

Related: Running Shoe Heel Drop Chart (Illustrated)

What does mm drop mean in shoes?

The meaning of mm drop in shoes is millimeter. Since the difference between the forefoot and heel stack is so small, it is expressed in millimeters.

In fact, other than the length of a running shoe, all the other values are generally expressed in mm and this is true for heel-to-toe drop as well.

Is 5mm drop running shoe a low drop running shoe?

Technically, a 5mm drop running shoe is a medium drop running shoe and not a low drop running shoe. Practically it is neither a medium drop running shoe nor a low drop running shoe as it is at the border of the two.

As mentioned above, 5mm drop actually belongs to the medium drop category. However, feel-wise, you will not feel much of a difference, between a 4mm and a 5mm drop.

Also, this drop will not feel as high as an 8mm drop. Basically from the drop category perspective, this is right in the grey zone.

Best 5mm heel-to-toe drop running shoes
Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Which Brand Is Right For You?

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka. All of these sports shoe brands are among the most popular running shoe brands…

They are comfortable and they have their own set of fan-following…

But between these three brands, is there anyone who shines the most? Let’s find out…

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka

Brooks Vs Saucony Vs Hoka: Differences

1. Hoka shoe’s maximum drop is 6mm whereas both Saucony and Brooks have a maximum drop of 12mm.

2. Both Hoka and Brooks produce more types of sports shoes, whereas Saucony produces only running shoes.

3. Brooks manufactures all types of sports apparel including socks, Hoka has shorts, tops, and leggings and Saucony manufactures tops, bottoms, and innerwear for women.

4. Brooks has 4 trail-running models and 25 road running models of shoes, Hoka has 12 trail-running models and 20 road-running models of shoes, whereas Saucony has 5 trail-running models and 15 road-running models.

5. Between three brands Hoka has the thickest cushioning with a 40mm heel stack and a 36mm forefoot stack (Bondi) closely followed by Brooks Cascadia (39mm hs/35mm fs) and Saucony Endorphin Pro 2 and Saucony Hurricane 23 (39mm hs/31mm fs).

6. Between the three, Hoka has the most models of running shoes, followed by Brooks and Saucony in that order.

7. Between the three, Brooks shoes look more stylish whereas both Hoka and Saucony shoes have a bulky appearance.

Related: ON Running Vs Nike Sizing: Differences And Similarities

Hoka and New Balance: Similarities

  • The minimum drop of Hoka, Brooks, and Saucony is 4mm.
  • Brooks, Saucony, and Hoka are shifting towards eco-friendly and sustainable materials.
  • All three have running shoes in the maximal cushioning category.
  • All three manufacture running shoes for trails and roads.
  • All three brands have a non-restrictive fit.
  • All three use engineered mesh in the upper of their running shoes.
  • All three use a foam material that is a derivative of EVA foam.
  • All three have at least one model that has a carbon fiber plate.

Shoe Construction

As a runner, you may already have a favorite brand. It may be Hoka, Saucony, Brooks, or any other brand…

Choice of a running shoe is very personal…and between these three brands which you will prefer will also be completely based on the comfort that you feel in them.

For some, they may like the flex grooves of Brooks or the meta rocker technology of Hoka. Or, they may like the no-fuss minimalistic Saucony Kinvara.

There is no definite way to tell which shoe you will like the most, although, all of these are well constructed and all the companies have spent years together to perfect the comfort that these shoes provide…

So, let’s find out what these brands have to offer and how they will benefit you…

Midsole

When selecting a running shoe, one of the main things that you will look at is the midsole. This is a make-or-break for your purchase decision.

Then between Hoka, Brooks, and Saucony which fares the most and which is worthy of your investment…let’s find out…

When it comes to Brooks, there are only a couple of types of midsoles that are present. Each of these midsoles has its own characteristics and will provide you with a unique experience. We will describe each of them below…

Brooks midsole type: Cushion

The midsole material that falls in this category is the DNA LOFT. This is a carefully calibrated mix of mesh, air, and rubber to provide you with one of the softest and cushiest midsoles available on the market.

To come up with this material, Brooks has mixed EVA foam with rubber and air. This provides you with that soft and cushy feeling when you wear the shoes like Brooks Ghost, Brooks Adrenaline, etc.

Another type of midsole that belongs to the cushion category is the BioMoGo DNA. This was a similar type of material to DNA LOFT. However, in many shoes, Brooks is transitioning to DNA LOFT from BioMOGo DNA as the former is a bit softer and cushier.

Brooks midsole type: Energize

The cushion material that belongs to this category is the DNA AMP. It is a responsive material and provides you with excellent energy return rather than absorbing it.

The material is springy and bouncy and is not as soft as the DNA LOFT.

It is made from polyurethane (PU) foam which is encased in a thin layer of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU).

In this variation of PU that is being used in these shoes, you will find plastic combined with rubber for the firmness and the elasticity. The TPU also provides DNA AMP with additional rigidity.

Shoes that belong to this category are Brooks Levitate.

Brooks midsole type: Speed

This type of cushioning is meant for fast and adaptive energy return. The midsole material that is created for this purpose is built with nitrogen infusion.

It is a very lightweight midsole that is meant for speed and good energy return.

Another aspect that imparts the speed to these kinds of midsoles is the Carbon Fiber Propulsion Plate. This is an ultralight plate that helps to keep you in your preferred motion path so that you run more efficiently.

Shoes that belong to this category are Brooks Hyperion Tempo, Brooks Launch, Brooks Launch GTS, and Brooks Hyperion Elite.

Holistic GuideRails System

Apart from the midsole cushioning, there is another component that comes into play if you are dealing with overpronation.

To provide you with stability, Brooks has come up with something called Holistic GuideRails System.

This is excellent for providing you with support and bringing your knees back in the line of motion and protecting the knees from injuries.

Also, this is the standard technology that Brooks has incorporated in all of its stability shoes like Brooks Adrenaline GTS, Brooks Addiction GTS, Launch GTS, Brooks Beast, and Brooks Ariel.

Hoka Midsole

Like Brooks, Hoka also uses EVA foam as the base material for its midsoles however, it is being made into CMEVA or Compression-Molded EVA foam. This is the primary material for the midsole of Hoka Shoes.

Apart from CMEVA, for a more smooth and natural heel-to-toe transition, Hoka uses meta rocker technology which is present in almost all the Hoka shoes.

However, as mentioned earlier in the Hoka Vs New Balance post, there are basically two types of rocker technologies. The early-stage meta rocker and the late-stage meta rocker.

The difference between these two types of meta rockers is the position where the transition zone is placed.

In the case of an early-stage meta rocker, the transition zone is placed behind the metatarsals, whereas for a late-stage meta rocker, the transition zone is placed in front of the metatarsal.

For stability, Hoka uses a J-Frame which is basically a firmer foam on the medial side in the shape of a J. This provides additional support to the runners with overpronation.

For Hoka, there is another H-Frame technology that comes into play in some shoes like Gaviota. The midfoot H-Frame provides you with increased upper support and also locks down the midfoot.

Saucony Midsole

Saucony midsoles are also using the base material of EVA foam and have changed it to suit different types of running and cushioning requirements.

Here are some of the technologies that come into play in the midsole of Saucony running shoes:

PWRRUN

PWRRUN is one of the primary materials that are used in the midsoles of Saucony. It is a TPU EVA blend and provides you responsive and cushioned feeling.

All the subsequent midsole materials are mostly an enhanced version of PWRRUN except for VERSAFOAM.

You will find PWRRUN in Saucony Kinvara, Saucony Ride, Saucony Echelon, and Saucony Guide among others.

PWRRUN+

PWRRUN+ is an enhanced version of PWRRUN and is lighter, softer, and springier than PWRRUN.

This will provide you with excellent feedback and will keep your feet well protected.

Shoes that belong to the PWRRUN+ category are Hurricane, Triumph, Cohesion, etc.

PWRRUN PB

This is yet another improvement in PWRRUN. The PWRRUN PB midsoles are made from a PEBA-based midsole and are very soft.

The responsiveness of these midsoles is slightly less and will provide you with excellent cushioning.

Running shoes from Saucony that uses PWRRUN PB are Endorphin Pro, Freedom, etc.

VERSARUN

This is a durable cushioning that is based on EVA foam and is very responsive. This holds its shape for a variety of activities.

Shoes that use VERSARUN are Cohesion.

Carbon Fiber Plate

The carbon Fiber Plate is introduced in the Endorphin models of Saucony. This is extremely lightweight and durable and improves the responsiveness of these shoes.

It is great for speed shoes and is excellent for speed drills.

SPEED ROLL technology

This is an advanced technology which is basically a footwear geometry that provides you with an always forward feel.

S-CURVE Carbon Plate

This is the kind of carbon plate that is present in midsoles of shoes like Endorphin PRO. It is shaped in the form of a curve at the arch of the foot and it bends downwards slightly at the balls of the foot.

This improves the responsiveness of the shoe…

Related: Brooks Ghost Vs Saucony Endorphin Speed: Which One Is The Best Choice For You?

To improve the stability of the support shoes, Saucony uses an extended medial post. This stabilizes your feet and controls your overpronation.

If you try to compare the cushioning level of Saucony, Hoka, and Brooks, you will find all of them have all the varieties from ultra-plush cushioning to very responsive running shoes.

All of them have some models that incorporate the carbon fiber plate.

However, I felt, that the cushioning of DNA LOFT was slightly softer than that of PWRRUN and CMEVA. Being said that, I personally prefer a soft running shoe and have always liked DNA LOFT for that matter.

So, setting my bias aside, the kind of cushioning and responsiveness that these shoes provide is very good and you can consider them at par.

However, if you want to go for something which has an ultra-high level of cushioning then Bondi will be a great choice for neutral runners.

Go for Beast or Ariel if you are an overpronating runner. If you like minimal springy cushioning, the Saucony Kinvara should be your choice.

Outsole

The outsole of Hoka is mostly made of durable blown rubber which is highly abrasion-resistant.

This will provide you with an excellent grip on both wet and dry surfaces and is excellent for any kind of terrain.

The outsole of Hoka shoes is not completely covered with rubber. Instead, it has rubber stips placed on the high wear and tear prone areas. This reinforces those areas and improves durability.

Another type of outsole is common in Hoka. In this type, Hoka uses a rubberized version of CMEVA. Actually, this is not any separate layer, rather the exposed midsole layer is rubberized.

This way they saved up on the rubber strips of durable rubber and simultaneously lighten the overall weight of the shoe.

However, durability-wise, these outsoles are a bit less durable, and also the traction felt slightly lesser on the wet surfaces.

The outsole of Brooks employs similar things as in Hoka and Saucony to provide you with a durable outsole that has a good grip on both wet and dry surfaces.

It uses HPR rubber strips on the high wear and tears prone zones like the forefoot and the heels. The area between the forefoot and the heels is often devoid of such kind of rubber.

However, those areas are made in such a way that they don’t come in contact with the ground.

One thing that is common in all three brands is that they employ similar techniques to improve the flexibility of the sole.

To improve the durability of the shoe, the usage of hard rubber is probably the only option. However, that adds to the stiffness of the outsole.

For that, there are flex grooves present on the forefoot. For Brooks, they are called Omega Flex Grooves. However, based on the shoe model, the type of grooves that are used also differ.

For example, in Brooks Ghost, the grooves are almost horizontal, whereas, in Launch, it is more in the shape of an arrow pattern.

You will not see such a difference in the rest of the two brands which use almost horizontal grooves for imparting flexibility to the forefoot.

For trail running shoes Brooks uses TrailTack. This is a sticky rubber compound that provides excellent grip on the trails.

The outsole of Saucony basically uses blown rubber that is spread across the forefoot and the heels.

Also, the kind of techniques that Saucony uses is similar to that of Brooks and Hoka for improving the grip and flexibility of the shoes.

However, the technologies that Saucony uses vary greatly from these brands and also from its shoe to shoe.

The technologies that Saucony uses in its outsole are:

TRI-FLEX

It improves the force dispersion over a larger surface and provides excellent flexibility and traction. It is often used with the EVERUN topsole.

XT-600

This is a carbon rubber compound that is used for improved durability. They provide excellent traction as well.

XT-900

This is a carbon rubber that uses excellent traction and durability. It is an improvement on XT-600.

CRYSTAL RUBBER

It provides you with very high durability and great traction. This material is more flexible than the XT series and provides you with a more natural movement.

Grip-wise, I would consider all the three brands at par. However, the rubberized midsoles that are used in some of the models of Hoka and Saucony have slightly lesser durability. Other than that, the outsoles of all these three brands are at par.

Upper

There are a lot of things that go into the upper of Hoka, Brooks, and Saucony.

However, what is common in all of these brands is that mostly they use Engineered Mesh.

Hoka mainly uses two types of mesh materials…one is the engineered mesh and the other is engineered jacquard mesh.

In Jacquard mesh, you will find complex designs are directly knitted in the mesh…whereas engineered mesh will give you a more open feel…

The breathability of both of these types of meshes is good…However, the appearance of jacquard mesh is denser and thicker.

To reduce its carbon footprint, Hoka has started using recycled materials for its upper…although not all of the models have recycled material, Hoka is speedily shifting towards that…

Most of the upper of Hoka shoes have TPU overlays…these overlays are used to reinforce the midfoot structure of the shoes.

The tongue of Hoka shoes is made from a similar mesh material as that of the upper and gives it a more uniform look like that of the upper. This makes the tongue breathable and comfortable.

Also, the tongue may be gusseted/integrated or non-gusseted/free…However, being anatomically designed, they will sit on the top of your foot properly and will not move around unnecessarily.

Hoka has started using that extended pull tabs in many models like Clifton or Mach. This is an Achilles support and also helps you to wear the shoe more easily…Also, it enhances the overall appeal of the shoe.

The heel counter of Hoka shoes are well constructed and locks your heel in. This doesn’t allow your heels to move around for any unforeseen accidents and/or create blisters.

Most of the shoes from Hoka have a Silicone Print Logo, some are glossy and some have a matt finish. This only enhances the appeal of the Hoka Shoes.

These Hoka Shoes have a sockliner which is from OrthoLite and most of them are removable. These are molded EVA sockliner and provide you with comfort and proper arch support.

The upper of Brooks running shoes are mostly made up of engineered mesh with the exception of the shoes that use GORE-TEX or GTX. It doesn’t use jacquard mesh as Hoka uses in some of the models.

The mesh material is well ventilated and keeps the airflow high inside the shoe.

Brooks is gradually moving towards a more sustainable type of mesh and is using recycled materials in its upper.

This is helping them to reduce their carbon footprint and is contributing to a cleaner environment.

Similar to Hoka and Saucony, Brooks also uses a removable sockliner that is meant to provide you with excellent comfort and arch support.

These sockliners are also breathable keeping the overall in-shoe environment dry.

Apart from this similarity, Brooks like Hoka is shifting towards the extended pull tab look. This not only improves the style of the shoes but also provides you with an easy way to put on the shoe.

The tongue of the running shoes of the Brooks brand is well padded and is mostly made of mesh material.

This makes the tongue comfortable and breathable, and it sits comfortably between the laces and the skin of the top of your feet. This avoids rubbing the laces which may cause blisters.

Like Hoka, the tongue of Brooks shoes may be gusseted or non-gusseted based on the model. However, what I’ve seen is no matter which model you choose, the tongue stays in place while running.

If you look at the upper of Saucony, it also has engineered mesh on the different models. The mesh that Saucony uses is also very breathable and like Brooks will help to keep the in-shoe environment cool and dry.

However, it uses FORMFIT in different models to provide you with exceptional fit and stretch according to the shape of your feet.

Most of the models of Saucony have adopted that extended pull tab. However, that pull tab is not as evident as that in Hoka or Brooks. If you are not observant, you will surely miss it. However, this also provides that added support to your Achilles area.

Also, the tongue of the shoes of Saucony is thick and well padded like its collar. This will keep you comfortable and will not move around while running.

In most of the models of Saucony, the tongue is anatomically designed and will provide you with the utmost comfort.

The laces that all these brands have adopted is a flat lace. They are mostly polyester laces that remain in place and are properly tied when you are running.

All the models have overlays on them. This reinforces the support of the upper and also enhances the overall style of the shoe.

Comfort-wise, the upper of all the three brands are at par, however, style-wise, I like Brooks more, followed by Hoka and then Saucony. This is a personal preference though, and it may vary for you.

Related: 10 Best Walking Shoes For Blister Prone Feet (Highly Rated)

Other Considerations

Hoka, Brooks and Saucony have a lot of similarities. All the brands produce running shoes whose most models are true to size although the way represent sizing may differ a bit. The cushioning is great, and so is the overall comfort.

Related: Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

However, there are a lot of differences. Firstly, Hoka is a low-drop shoe brand whereas both Saucony and Brooks have many models that have higher drops.

But most importantly, it is how they handle their cushioning which we have covered in great detail above.

Durability

Typically a Hoka shoe will last you for around 350 miles. After that, you may start to see the wear and tear.

Since most of the Hoka shoes fall in the max cushioned category, this is expected. I would invest in a good shoe that lasts for some lesser miles than spend the same money on a physician to fix the problems caused by a cheap running shoe.

For Brooks and Saucony, the durability is slightly higher around 400 to 450 miles. From a running distance perspective that may be another 1 month extra of running.

This is where I feel, Brooks fares slightly better.

Cushioning

The primary cushioning material of Hoka is CMEVA. It is a very cushy and responsive material. However, I feel, this is slightly stiffer than DNA LOFT which is one of the primary cushioning materials from Brooks.

Related: Hoka Bondi Vs Clifton – Which Hoka Is Best For Your Feet?

Brooks Ghost Vs Hoka Clifton – Which One Is Best For Your Feet?

Also, the PWRRUN or its further enhancements that you find in Saucony is soft and cushy. The cushioning is good and comfortable, but the bounciness could have been better.

However, that is slightly better with Hoka and Brooks.

It is hard to decide on which one is better as all the cushions score some points in one aspect and lose some in the other. But nonetheless, all of them are very comfortable. The final choice will be the kind that you would want…

Overall Fit And Comfort

The overall fit of both Brooks and Hoka are similar as both of them has a wideish fit. Saucony on the other hand, for some of the models, has a bit of a snug fit.

However, one big shortcoming of Hoka is that, apart from the popular models like Bondi and Clifton, most of the other models don’t have a wide fit.

This is true for Saucony as well, where apart from the models Kinvara and Triumph there are no wide shoes.

Brooks shines in this aspect. It has a wide and extra wide-fitting shoe for most of its models. This is good news for runners like me who have bunions. We need running shoes that are wider on the forefoot.

Related: 6 Best Running Shoes For Tailor’s Bunion

Pricing

The starting price of Brooks running shoes is around $75 and in the range between $75 to $100, you have a lot of variety including trail running shoes.

However, with Hoka, the starting price of their road running range is around $130. You will not find a road running shoe in the $50-$100 range.

For Saucony, the starting price is around $85. Also, in the price range up to $100, you will not have a lot of options.

So, if you want to just try out a Hoka or Saucony, then you will have to pay a little more than Brooks. Also, the choices that you will have, may not be what you want.

However, for the most premium shoes, all the models, the prices reach slightly above $200.

So, if you don’t want to spend a lot of money, then you can go for Brooks…

However, if you have a budget of $100 or above, you have options from all of these brands.

Conclusion

If you compare Saucony Vs Hoka Vs Brooks, all of these brands almost are at par.

There are a couple of places where Hoka gets a few extra points and in others, Brooks or Saucony scores high.

So, if we want to pick a winner then it will not be fair to the other two Brands. The whole thing that the choice between these brands will boil down to the kind of comfort you feel in these shoes.

For me, I prefer Brooks and I cannot describe all the reasons why…but it feels more comfortable for me…and I don’t end up with bunion pain.

Other than that, I loved the shoes of all the three brands and you will love them as well…

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

Topo Vs Altra Sizing Chart: How Different Are They?

Comparing the sizes of Topo and Altra is very interesting.

They have almost similar sizes with one of them offering a couple of extra sizes for both men and women.

Also, some of the size numbers in Topo and Altra are different, however, the length in cm or inches are the same.

That is why we have included, the length of the shoe in cm (inches) along with sizes for each country like US, UK, EU…

This helps standardize the sizes and you will be able to tally the sizes based on an actual length and not some arbitrary number.

Related: New Balance Size Chart Vs Nike

Topo Vs Altra Sizing

Topo Vs Altra Sizing: Differences

1. Topo Athletic’s minimum length: 22.5 cm (8.85 inches) W/25 cm (9.84 inches) M, Altra‘s minimum length: 22 cm (8.66 inches) W/26 cm (10.24 inches) M

2. Topo Athletic doesn’t have 5.5 (US)/3.5 (UK)/36 (EU), 11.5 (US)/9.5 (UK)/44 (EU), and 13 (US)/11 (UK)/46 (EU) for women and 16 (US)/15 (UK)/51.5 (EU) for men. All these sizes are available in Altra.

3. Altra doesn’t have 7 (US)/6 (UK)/40 (EU) and 7.5 (US)/6.5 (UK)/40.5 (EU) sizes for men. These sizes are available in Topo Athletic.

4. The size 44.5 (EU) of Altra is equivalent to 44 of Topo Athletic for women’s shoes.

5. The size 44 (EU) of Altra doesn’t have an equivalent size in Topo Athletic for women.

6. The size 47.5 (EU) of Topo Athletic is equivalent to 47 (EU) of Altra for the men’s version of the shoes.

Related: Running Shoe Heel Drop Chart (Illustrated)

Topo Athletic Vs Altra Sizing: Women’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

TA (US)

Altra (US)

TA (UK)

Altra (UK)

TA (EU)

Altra (EU)

22 cm

(8.66 in)

N/A

5.5

N/A

3.5

N/A

36

22.5 cm

(8.85 in)

6

6

4

4

37

37

23 cm

(9.05 in)

6.5

6.5

4.5

4.5

37.5

37.5

23.5 cm

(9.25 in)

7

7

5

5

38

38

24 cm

(9.45 in)

7.5

7.5

5.5

5.5

38.5

38.5

24.5 cm

(9.65 in)

8

8

6

6

39

39

25 cm

(9.85 in)

8.5

8.5

6.5

6.5

40

40

25.5 cm

(10.03 in)

9

9

7

7

40.5

40.5

26 cm

(10.24 in)

9.5

9.5

7.5

7.5

41

41

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

10

10

8

8

42

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

10.5

10.5

8.5

8.5

42.5

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

11

11

9

9

43

43

28 cm

(11.02 in)

N/A

11.5

N/A

9.5

N/A

44

28.5 cm

(11.22 in)

12

12

10

10

44

44.5

29.5 cm

(11.61 in)

N/A

13

N/A

11

N/A

46

Download Topo Vs Altra Size Chart For Women

Related: Top 24 Best Running Shoes For Bunions Reviewed

Altra Vs Topo Sizing: Men’s Shoes (cm, inches)

cm (inches)

Topo (US)

Altra (US)

Topo (UK)

Altra (UK)

Topo (EU)

Altra (EU)

25 cm

(9.84 in)

7

N/A

6

N/A

40

N/A

25.5 cm

(10.04 in)

7.5

N/A

6.5

N/A

40.5

N/A

26 cm

(10.24 in)

8

8

7

7

41

41

26.5 cm

(10.43 in)

8.5

8.5

7.5

7.5

42

42

27 cm

(10.63 in)

9

9

8

8

42.5

42.5

27.5 cm

(10.83 in)

9.5

9.5

8.5

8.5

43

43

28 cm

(11.02 in)

10

10

9

9

44

44

28.5 cm

(11.22 in)

10.5

10.5

9.5

9.5

44.5

44.5

29 cm

(11.42 in)

11

11

10

10

45

45

29.5 cm

(11.61 in)

11.5

11.5

10.5

10.5

46

46

30 cm

(11.81 in)

12

12

11

11

46.5

46.5

30.5 cm

(12 in)

12.5

12.5

11.5

11.5

47.5

47

31 cm

(12.20 in)

13

13

12

12

48

48

32 cm

(12.60 in)

14

14

13

13

49

49

33 cm

(13 in)

15

15

14

14

50

50

34 cm

(13.39 in)

N/A

16

N/A

15

N/A

51.5

Download Altra size compared to Topo (Men)

Related: Top 15 Best Running Shoes for Morton’s Neuroma Reviewed

Do Topo Athletic Run Bigger Or Smaller Than Altra?

Most of the sizes of Topo Athletic are the same as that of Altra. However, there are a couple of them that varies.

First of all, some of the sizes that are available in the women’s version of Altra running shoes are not present in Topo Athletic running shoes.

In the men’s version, the situation is the opposite. Some of the sizes that are available in Topo Athletic are not present in Altra.

There is an anomaly with the size 44 (EU) of Topo Athletic and that of 44.5 (EU) of Altra. Lengthwise both are similar, however, the numbering is different, and also, this is the last size that is available from Topo Athletic in the women’s version of the shoes.

However, the interesting thing about this size is that they are represented by the same numbers for Altra and Topo Athletic for the US and UK regions.

A similar anomaly exists for the men’s version of the shoes also. The 47.5 (EU) of Topo Athletic is equivalent to the size 47 (EU) of Altra s both of them have the same length.

But, for US and UK regions, are represented by the same number for both the companies.

Related: ON Running Vs Nike Sizing: Differences And Similarities

Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.

10 Best Walking Shoes For Blister Prone Feet (Highly Rated)

10 Best Walking Shoes For Blister Prone Feet (Highly Rated)

[aff_disclosure]

Blisters are a nuisance. Those fluid-filled bubbles are annoying, to begin with, and when they pop, they become painful…And takes days to heal and leaves nasty scars…

Plus, with them, you can hardly run as they will constantly remind you that they are there with their pain and persistent irritation…

However, if you have to stop walking or your regular exercise because of that, the problem is twofold….first you have to bear the trouble of having a blister plus your health goals will suffer…

Then again, you really cannot do much, if you have blister-prone feet…or can you?

If you think that this is a lost cause, then take a look at New Balance 874v4…I’m not saying that it will take away all your blister problems, but it will surely minimize them…This is an effective solution if you have blister-prone feet…

However, if you are not a fan of New Balance or you want to try out some other shoe or you are just simply curious, check out the rest of the walking shoes in our below list of “best walking shoes for blister-prone feet“. Hopefully, they will help…

Best Walking Shoes For Blister-Prone Feet (Detailed Review)

NEW BALANCE 847v4

The first walking shoe on the list is New Balance 847v4. I always like New Balance shoes due to the comfortable width that they provide.

New Balance 847 is also not an exception…

But why is required if you are trying to avoid blisters?

First of all, if your toes are cramped in a smaller toe-box, they will rub against one another. This friction will generate heat and will create blisters.

Also, a similar thing will happen with the walls of the shoes that will get rubber against the sides of your feet. This increases the probability of getting a blister.

However, with a wider toe-box like that in New Balance 874, such a problem will not occur and your toes can easily splay without getting rubbed against the walls of the shoe.

Also, the overall fit of the New Balance 847 is wideish and it doesn’t rub against your feet to cause irritation and blisters.

The inner lining of this shoe is smooth and doesn’t have any stitches. This makes it very comfortable and doesn’t irritate your skin.

Also, the heel cup area is decent and locks in your feet. It doesn’t slip to cause excessive friction. The padding of the tongue and collar also is an added protection to the skin of the feet.

That is why it is a very good walking shoe to protect you against blisters.

Pros

  • No-sew upper.
  • Different widths are available.
  • Engineered mesh for added breathability.
  • Smooth interiors.
  • Good stabilization of feet.

Cons

  • Boring to look at.
BROOKS ADDICTION WALKER 2

Brooks Addiction Walker has been a crowd favorite for some time now. They are roomy, comfortable, and have great cushioning.

But will they work for your blister-prone feet?

Let’s find out.

Brooks Addiction Walker comes in different styles of upper with essentially the same midsole and outsole.

It has a mesh version and a leather one. One of the versions even comes with a velcro strap instead of laces.

What is common in all these uppers is that all of them are very comfortable…

The toe-box of this shoe is roomy and accomadates your natural splay easily. This way you won’t feel cramped and suffocated. Your toes will have enough space to wiggle and they won’t rub against each other avoiding any friction between them.

This will help in avoiding any potential blisters that may form in between your toes.

Also, having enough wiggle space helps in not rubbing off your feet against the walls of the shoe. This way, the sides of your big toe and little toe are safe from blisters.

It has some stitching on its upper. However, you won’t be able to feel them from the inside of the shoe. In other words, the stiches will not irritate your skin to cause blisters.

However, there is one concern that you may have with this shoe, which I also had. The upper is made from a leather like material. This restricts the breathability of the shoe to certain extent.

If you have a naturally sweaty feet, then it is best to avoid this type of upper. Go for the one which has mesh in the upper and you will be able to not have to worry about the beathability of the shoe.

Brooks Addiction has a well-padded collar and tongue and will provide you with excellent comfort and stability. This also minimizes any further mivement. Also, the heel cup is good and holds your heels in place.

All these measures help you to avoid any potential blisters that may occur.

Pros

  • True to size.
  • Wideish overall fit.
  • Good for standing all day.
  • Squarish front area for more room.

Cons

  • Needs to be broken in.
  • Makes a squishy sound.
New Balance 577v5

New Balance 577v5 is not only a walking shoe and can be used for everyday training as well. It is stable and comfortable.

The cushioning of this shoe comes from CUSH+ midsole and memory insert that provides you with ultra-soft underfoot cushioning.

The upper is made from breathable mesh. This keeps the airflow in the shoe proper during your walking. Also, the material is sweat-wicking, keeping your feet dry. This helps you to avoid blisters due to moisture and heat generated during workouts.

You find some overlays on the upper of this shoe. These overlays, however, are no-sew, which means that you will not have to deal with irritation due to exposed stitches.

The inner lining of the shoe is smooth and will not rub against your feet to create hot zones that later convert into blisters.

The overall fit is also comfortable and provides your feet with enough room to expand without being squished. This is why you may not have to deal with blisters while wearing this shoe.

Also, this is available in wide as well, providing comfort to runners with wide feet.

The heel cup and the overall heel area are also decently padded and smooth. It will not slip and slide and will not cause blisters on your heels or your ankle area. I would have loved the collar padding to be a bit more, but the price range at which this is available provides good enough padding and stability.

The skin of the top of your foot is protected by the decently padded tongue which sits in between the foot and the flat laces. The padding of the tongue could have been better, but, nonetheless, it provides ample protection for you against the rubbing of the laces against your feet.

Overall, I like the shoe and it has all the measures in please to avoid any blisters during walking or training.

Pros

  • No-sew overlays on the upper.
  • Available in standard and wide fit.
  • Stylish and breathable.
  • Multipurpose.

Cons

  • Not enough arch support.
BROOKS ARIEL'20

I know I know…

This is not a typical walking shoe, for that matter, it is a proper running shoe and yes it is…

However, you can comfortably use it for walking and you will not be let down. Plus, this is a motion control shoe which is a bit hard to find in a typical walking shoe.

Nonetheless, Brooks Ariel speaks for itself…

It is a well-made, highly cushioned workout shoe that will provide you with excellent stability and great comfort.

Can you avoid blisters in them?

Well definitely…Let me tell you how…

First of all, Ariel has a roundish and wideish toe-box…this is one of the primary requirements of any shoe in which you want to avoid blisters. The shoe should not rub your toes, nor it should squish them.

Brooks Ariel’s toe-box has enough room for you to comfortably splay your feet. It will not restrict your movements and will not create any hot zones or additional friction. This makes it perfect for someone with severe overpronation and blister-prone feet.

Another great aspect of Brooks Ariel is the mesh upper. It is very breathable and will provide you with a cool and dry space within the shoe. Also, the temperature of your feet will remain controlled during the walking session.

The material of the inside of the shoe is also moisture-wicking. It will help to dry the sweat very easily.

The tongue is very well padded and the lining of it is very smooth. It is also breathable making the top of your feet very comfortable and dry. It will not move around your feet while you are walking and will not create additional friction to cause any blisters.

The same goes for the heel area. The heel cup is very well made and will not slip which is one of the primary reasons for blisters at the back of the heels.

Also, the ankle cut height is just right. This doesn’t rub against the bone of the ankle joint to create any blisters.

Overall, I like the shoe for its smoothness and stability. You may not have to deal with blisters at all if you are using this shoe.

Pros

  • Breathable mesh.
  • Roundish and widish toe-box.
  • Very comfortable.
  • Excellent stability.

Cons

  • Heavy.
NEW BALANCE 877v1

New Balance 877 is a proper walking shoe. You won’t be able to run in them. It can be used for training to a certain extent but, it is not made for such activities.

However, it does a fabulous job as a walking shoe and is get for even walking long miles or standing all day.

But will it protect against blisters as the are overlays that are stitched on the upper?

If you are concerned about that, there is nothing to worry…You won’t be able to feel those stitches from inside the shoe. So, there is very minimal chance of them rubbing against your skin.

This is good news if you have sensitive or blister-prone skin. This will not irritate your skin and will not cause further blisters.

Also, the width of the shoe is very comfortable and will not squish any part of your feet. This is great as any kind of constriction will basically create hot zones which will get converted to blisters.

The same goes for the heel area. It has a smooth lining and moisture-wicking material. This will not let your heels sweat. Also, the heel cup will keep the heels in place and will not let them slide.

This way you will be able to avoid blisters on the heels.

The tongue of this shoe is also well-padded and breathable. It has a smooth lining along with moisture-wicking material. This will not let the top of your feet sweat and rub against it to cause blisters.

This is a good shoe for standing all day or walking and you will not have to worry about breaking out in blisters.

Pros

  • Stitches are not exposed inside.
  • Available in 4 different widths.
  • Looks vintage.
  • Good for all-day standing and walking.

Cons

  • The length of the shoe feels small.
NEWTON KISMET 8

I love the look of Newton Kismet 8. This is ultra-stylish stability running shoe that can be used for walking as well.

It has a gender-shaped fit and is very lightweight.

To make it lightweight, one of the primary contributors is the engineered mesh upper. This upper apart from being very stylish looking is very practical and breathable.

It is a no-sew upper and doesn’t have any stitches exposed on the inside of the shoe. This way, your feet will remain comfortable and they will not rub against your skin to create hot zones and blisters.

The width of the toe-box is also comfortable, it will not restrict the natural splay of your toes and is great for people who have blister-prone feet.

It will not rub against your skin and will not squish your toes, two of the primary reasons for blisters.

Also, the shoe itself is roomy and will not constrict you in any way. This way, your feet remain separated from the walls of the shoes and will not rub against them even when they expand.

This is good to avoid blisters because this is when they typically get formed.

What about the heel area?

It is very smooth and has moisture-wicking material. This will keep your heel area dry and will not let blisters form. Another reason that you may not have heel blisters is that the shoe heel doesn’t slip and locks in your heels and minimizes any type of heel movement.

Also, the overall breathability of the mesh is high, keeping your feet cool and dry during walking. This helps to avoid blisters mostly, if not completely…

Pros

  • Plush and stable.
  • Very stylish.
  • Can be used right out of the box.
  • Lightweight.
  • Good for foot issues like metatarsalgia, sesamoiditis, etc.

Cons

  • Length may be slight of a problem for long toes.
RYKA DEVOTION PLUS 2

Ryka Devotion Plus 2 is a workout plus walking shoe. It has a good amount of cushioning and there is a circular zone under the ball of the big toe to add a little bit of extra pep.

The shoe is comfortable and wide and has a smooth interior. This is good for walkers who have blister-prone feet.

If the stitches are exposed inside, they will inevitably rub against the skin of your feet. This will create heat and subsequent blisters no matter the type of feet.

Having a smooth interior of Ryka Devotion Plus 2 helps you to avoid this situation.

One thing I love about Devotion Plus is that the toe-box of this shoe has a lot of depth. This means the top of the shoe will not rub against the skin of the toes. Although having a lower toe-box depth is not a problem generally, but for a person whose feet is prone to blisters, this may create a problem.

This is where Ryka Devotion Plus shines.

Also, the padded tongue and collar along with the smooth heel area protect the heel area and the top of the foot from any kind of friction that can create blisters.

It is well-ventilated and is excellent for keeping your feet cool and dry. With reduced friction and dry feet, blisters can be totally avoided, if not they will be at a minimum.

Pros

  • Good depth of the toe-box.
  • Additional pep due to the kind of midsole and outsole.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Excellent for walking and cross-training.

Cons

  • Bulky.
SKECHERS GO WALK JOY-15641

Skechers GO Walk Joy-15641 is a proper walking shoe. It is a lightweight shoe that is good for walking. However, if you want to walk long distances, it is not that helpful as cushioning is not that supportive for longer distances.

However, for shorter distances and for evening walks, they are perfect and comfortable.

The upper of Skechers GO Walk Joy is made from mesh. It is breathable and comfortable and doesn’t let your feet remain damp.

The inner of the shoe has more of a velvet kind of feeling rather than a silky soft feeling. However, that is not rough against your skin to generate heat or friction.

It will not rub against your skin to irritate it and create blisters. This is true throughout the length of the shoe and provides you with a comfortable experience.

Due to good airflow in the shoe, your feet will not become hot and sweaty. The inner lining of the shoe absorbs sweat fast and dries easily.

This keeps your feet dry and reduces the chances of blisters developing due to dampness.

The heel cup and the tongue are is padded decently. The padding is not very high but is decent enough for keeping your feet in place.

This invariably reduces further friction and will help you to keep blisters at bay…

Pros

  • The upper doesn’t have any stitches.
  • Good for short-distance walking.
  • Lightweight.

Cons

  • Not long-lasting.
ADIDAS QUESTAR FLOW NXT

Adidas Questar Flow Nxt is a lightweight shoe for short-distance running, walking, and training purposes.

It is functional and comfortable and will help you to get your workout in. It is a no-fuss bare minimum workout shoe that is stable and supportive.

The upper of this shoe is made from mesh material making it comfortable and breathable. This keeps the airflow inside the shoe high and will keep your feet dry.

This way, your feet have fewer chances of developing blisters as the dampness that contributes to this will not be there.

Also, the inner lining is smooth and is unlikely to create hotspots and friction. This will keep blisters at bay even if you have blister-prone feet.

One thing that I found maybe a bit of a concern for this shoe is the tongue area. The tongue area has light stitches. The stitches are soft and malleable and unlikely to cause blisters.

However, if you have a severely blister-prone foot, you may have a problem with this. In this case, proper socks may be good to use and be comfortable.

Also, the thickness of the padding of the tongue is not great. You will be able to feel the laces through it. Although that may not to sufficient to cause blisters, nonetheless the feeling will be there.

This Adidas is more like the ‘cades’ that we used to use in schools (I know, those were ancient days for me)…but they have additional padding in the heel area, which is more than ‘cades’. A little more would have been better.

Pros

  • No-sew upper.
  • Minimalistic.
  • Good breathability.
  • Lightweight.

Cons

  • Not enough padding on the tongue.
  • The tongue has stitches.
UNDER ARMOUR CHARGED ASSERT 9

Under Armour Charged Assert 9 is the last shoe on our list. It is a comfortable workout shoe that is great for walking.

Also, it doesn’t have the problems that the workout shoe that was previously on our list. The tongue of Under Armour Charged Assert is well padded and doesn’t have stitches on the inside.

The inside of the tongue is smooth and will not irritate the top of your feet. This way you will be able to avoid blisters on the top of the feet as the tongue will not rub against your skin.

Also since it is between the top of your foot and the laces, the laces will also not rub against your skin and the chances of blisters are further avoided.

The inner lining of the shoe is also smooth and devoid of stitches. This is also great if you have blister-prone feet.

The last but final area of concern is the heel area. The heel area is lined with a soft lining and is devoid of stitches. It is unlikely that it will create any irritation and blisters.

Also, the upper is made from mesh material and is well ventilated. This further reduces the chances of blisters as your feet will remain dry and cool.

Pros

  • No-sew upper.
  • No breaking-in period is needed.
  • Lightweight.

Cons

  • Toe-box is a bit short.

FAQ

How to select a walking shoe for blister-prone feet?

To select a walking shoe for blister prone feet, the toe box should have sufficient space, a smooth inner surface, and the heel area should be locked in.

I’ve already explained this in detail here.

Some of the things that I’ve missed there, I’ll include here:

Bunching of the insole

This is another major reason for blisters in walking shoes. Sometimes the insole may move around or may bunch up.

They rub against your underfoot generating blisters.

Old and worn shoes

If you are wearing an old shoe that is worn down, then you may get blisters. For example, the cushion of the heel area has developed a hole, and the fabric covering has come off and hanging.

Now, this may rub behind your heels creating heat and friction and a blister may develop.

How do I prevent blisters from new walking shoes?

To prevent blisters from new walking shoes, you need to select them properly so that it is overall spacious, has a smooth internal lining, a thick tongue, and collar, and good heel lock-in. Also, you need to break in the walking shoe properly.

Before purchasing online, if possible try out the shoe in a store, to check if you are feeling restricted anywhere while walking. If you are feeling restricted anywhere, then only it is a problem and blisters will surely occur. If not, then you are good to go.

Related: How To Break In New Running Shoes?

How do I prevent blisters on my feet when walking?

To prevent blisters on your feet when walking does the following:

  • Select your walking shoe carefully.
  • Gradually break in the walking shoe.
  • Apply a thin layer of moisturizer or petroleum jelly on the feet before starting to walk.
  • Wrap your feet with a soft bandage.
  • Use moisture-wicking socks.
  • Use socks that are specifically made to prevent blisters.
  • Stop walking immediately, if you feel any kind of discomfort or irritation.
Top walking shoes for blister-prone feet
Madhusree Basu

Madhusree Basu

Author, Admin

Blogger and a fitness enthusiast. She loves running and Yoga and everything in between. She started running to manage her weight and to eat to her heart’s content. A true foodie at heart she shares whatever knowledge she has gained throughout the years about weight management and fitness.